Pathways to an International Agreement to Leave Fossil Fuels in the Ground

被引:34
作者
van Asselt, Harro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Newell, Peter [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Eastern Finland, Law Sch, Ctr Climate Change Energy & Environm Law CCEEL, Climate Law & Policy, Kuopio, Finland
[2] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Stockholm Environm Inst, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Univ Sussex, Int Relat, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[5] Rapid Transit Alliance, Falmer, England
[6] Univ Sussex, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[7] Univ Oxford, Oxford, England
[8] Univ Warwick, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[9] Univ East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[10] FLACSO Argentina, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
CLIMATE-CHANGE; NEGOTIATIONS; COOPERATION; POLICIES; STATE; CLUBS;
D O I
10.1162/glep_a_00674
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To achieve the Paris Agreement's temperature goal, fossil fuel production needs to undergo a managed decline. While some frontrunner countries have already begun to adopt policies and measures restricting fossil fuel supply, an outstanding question is how international cooperation in support of a managed decline of fossil fuel production could take shape. This article explores two possible pathways-one following a club model and the other more akin to a multilateral environmental agreement. Specifically, the article discusses the participants in an international agreement; the forum through which cooperation will take place; the modalities, principles, and procedures underpinning the agreement; and the incentives to induce cooperation. The article concludes that the most likely scenario at this juncture is the emergence of club arrangements covering particular fossil fuel sources and groups of actors that, over time, give rise to growing calls for a more coordinated and multilateral response.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 47
页数:20
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [51] Swimming upstream: addressing fossil fuel supply under the UNFCCC
    Piggot, Georgia
    Erickson, Peter
    van Asselt, Harro
    Lazarus, Michael
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2018, 18 (09) : 1189 - 1202
  • [52] The influence of social movements on policies that constrain fossil fuel supply
    Piggot, Georgia
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2018, 18 (07) : 942 - 954
  • [54] The evolving arms control agenda - Implications of the role of NGOS in banning antipersonnel landmines
    Rutherford, KR
    [J]. WORLD POLITICS, 2000, 53 (01) : 74 - +
  • [55] Savaresi Annalisa, 2020, HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES
  • [56] Stranded fossil-fuel assets translate to major losses for investors in advanced economies
    Semieniuk, Gregor
    Holden, Philip B.
    Mercure, Jean-Francois
    Salas, Pablo
    Pollitt, Hector
    Jobson, Katharine
    Vercoulen, Pim
    Chewpreecha, Unnada
    Edwards, Neil R.
    Vinuales, Jorge E.
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 12 (06) : 532 - +
  • [57] Setzer J., 2021, Global trends in climate change litigation: 2021 snapshot
  • [58] Sinn Hans-Werner., 2012, GREEN PARADOX SUPPLY, DOI 10.7551/mitpress/8734.001.0001
  • [59] A just compensation for leaving it in the ground: Climate easements and oil development
    Snyder, Brian F.
    Ruyle, Leslie E.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2020, 112 : 181 - 188
  • [60] Stavins R, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE, P1001