One-stage robotically assisted laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: analysis of 179 patients

被引:10
|
作者
Antanavicius, Gintaras [1 ]
Rezvani, Masoud [1 ]
Sucandy, Iswanto [1 ]
机构
[1] Abington Mem Hosp, Dept Surg, Inst Bariatr & Metab Surg, Abington, PA 19001 USA
关键词
Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch; Robotic-assisted; Morbid obesity; BARIATRIC SURGERY; LEARNING-CURVE; OBESE PATIENTS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.soard.2014.10.023
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) has been reported to be the most effective procedure for weight loss and minimizing postoperative weight regian. However, because of its technical complexity and concerns for higher operative and metabolic complications, it has not obtained widespread acceptance among patients or bariatric surgeons. Nevertheless, the use of robotic systems has been increasing because of its ability to overcome technical challenges, such as torque, freedom of movement, and precision. The objective of this study was to review the efficacy and safety of robotic assistance in laparoscopic BPD-DS. Methods: A prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic BPD-DS between 2008 and 2013 Was, reviewed retrospectively. Results: A total of 179 consecutive patients (137 female and 42 male) were included in the study. The mean age was 44 years (20-72 yr). Mean body mass index (BMI) was 50.3 kg/m(2) (35-78.8 kg/m(2)), and the number of preoperative co-morbidities was 6.6 (2-14). Mean operative time for a typical BPD-DS with appendectomy was 249 minutes (162-413 min), which increased to 278 minutes (193-463 min) in adhesiolysis associated cases and increased to 272 minutes (186-431 min) if additional procedures, such as hiatal hernia repair, cholecystectomy, or Meckel's diverticulum resection, were included. All procedures were completed as a single-stage operation. There were no major intra-operative complications. Two patients had unexpected returns to the operating room during the same admission: one for an endoscopic release of an inadvertently sutured nasogastric tube and the other for port site infection. Median hospital stay was 2.7 days (1-13). Two patients had significantly longer stays for carpal tunnel syndrome exacerbation (9 d) and port site infection (13 d). Postoperatively, the median excess weight loss at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months with follow-up of 71% of patients at I year, 45% of patients at 2 years, and 15% of patients at 5 years, was 19%, 35.9%, 53.1%, 65.6%, 74.6%, 79.9%, and 75.8%, respectively. Diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia went into remission 95.5%, 92.1%, and 92% of the time, respectively. No mortality occurred. Conclusions: Robotically assisted duodenoileal anastomosis during laparoscopic BPD-DS is a feasible, well-tolerated, and effective alternative to assist in the technically challenging part of the operation. (C) 2015 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 371
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch: Three Different Duodeno-ileal Anastomotic Techniques and Initial Experience
    R A Weiner
    R Blanco-Engert
    S Weiner
    I Pomhoff
    M Schramm
    Obesity Surgery, 2004, 14 : 334 - 340
  • [32] The Outcomes of Laparoscopic Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch on Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease: the Mayo Clinic Experience
    Badaoui, Joseph N.
    Kellogg, Todd A.
    Abu Dayyeh, Barham K.
    Maroun, Justin W.
    McKenzie, Travis J.
    Harmsen, William S.
    Kendrick, Michael L.
    Ghanem, Omar M.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2021, 31 (10) : 4363 - 4370
  • [33] The Outcomes of Laparoscopic Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch on Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease: the Mayo Clinic Experience
    Joseph N. Badaoui
    Todd A. Kellogg
    Barham K. Abu Dayyeh
    Justin W. Maroun
    Travis J. McKenzie
    William S. Harmsen
    Michael L. Kendrick
    Omar M. Ghanem
    Obesity Surgery, 2021, 31 : 4363 - 4370
  • [34] Analysis of the Impact of the Learning Curve on the Safety Outcome of the Totally Robotic-Assisted Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch: a Single-Institution Observational Study
    Andre Teixeira
    Muhammad Jawad
    Muhammad Ghanem
    Alexis Sánchez
    Carlos Petrola
    Romulo Lind
    Obesity Surgery, 2023, 33 : 2742 - 2748
  • [35] Three Hundred Four Robotically Assisted Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch Operations with Gradual Robotic Approach Implementation: Short-Term Outcomes, Complication Profile, and Lessons Learned
    Gintaras Antanavicius
    Theodoros Katsichtis
    Waed Alswealmeen
    Mohammed Assali
    Obesity Surgery, 2020, 30 : 3961 - 3967
  • [36] Should biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch be done as single-stage procedure in patients with BMI ≥50 kg/m2?
    Topart, Philippe
    Becouarn, Guillaume
    Ritz, Patrick
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2010, 6 (01) : 59 - 63
  • [37] Comment on: Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion/duodenal switch or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for super-obesity-weight loss versus side effects
    Topart, Philippe A.
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2010, 6 (04) : 414 - 416
  • [38] Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy followed by duodenal switch in selected patients versus single-stage duodenal switch for superobesity: case-control study
    Iannelli, Antonio
    Schneck, Anne-Sophie
    Topart, Philippe
    Carles, Michel
    Hebuterne, Xavier
    Gugenheim, Jean
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2013, 9 (04) : 531 - 538
  • [39] Laparoscopic Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch - The Most Effective Operation for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. How I do it?
    Copaescu, Catalin
    CHIRURGIA, 2018, 113 (05) : 704 - 711
  • [40] Acute and Chronic Impact of Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch Surgery on Plasma Lipoprotein(a) Levels in Patients with Severe Obesity
    Audrey-Anne Després
    Marie-Eve Piché
    Audrey Auclair
    Laurent Biertho
    Simon Marceau
    Frédéric-Simon Hould
    Simon Biron
    Stéfane Lebel
    Odette Lescelleur
    François Julien
    Julie Martin
    André Tchernof
    Patrick Mathieu
    Paul Poirier
    Benoit J. Arsenault
    Obesity Surgery, 2020, 30 : 3714 - 3720