Transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with advanced kidney disease: A propensity score-matched analysis

BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an alternative for surgically inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis. Advanced kidney disease may significantly affect outcomes in patients treated with TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). HypothesisTAVR is associated with better in-hospital outcomes compared with SAVR in patients with advanced kidney disease. MethodsWe identified our sample from the National Inpatient Sample between 2012 and 2014, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. We included patients with chronic kidney disease stages IV and V and end-stage renal disease as advanced kidney disease patients. We excluded patients with acute kidney injury on admission and patients on dialysis. ResultsAfter propensity matching, 2485 patients were included in each group. The primary outcome of in-hospital mortality (12.9% vs 6.2%; P<0.01) was higher with SAVR as compared with TAVR. Patients who underwent SAVR reported higher acute kidney injury (50.3% vs 33%; P<0.01) and dialysis requirements (26.8% vs 20.1%; P<0.01). Other secondary outcomes including blood transfusion, atrial fibrillation, iatrogenic cardiac complications, pericardial complications, perioperative stroke, perioperative infections, and postoperative shock were more common with SAVR. With SAVR, the length of hospitalization and hospitalization costs were significantly higher; however, permanent pacemaker placement was more common with TAVR compared with SAVR. ConclusionsIn patients with advanced kidney disease, SAVR was associated with higher mortality and higher periprocedural complications, as compared with TAVR. Thus, benefits of TAVR could be extended in patients with advanced kidney disease who cannot undergo surgery.