Seasonal progression of bud dormancy in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) in a Mediterranean climate: A single-node cutting approach

被引:14
作者
Campoy, J. A. [1 ]
Ruiz, D. [1 ]
Egea, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] CEBAS CSIC, Dept Plant Breeding, Murcia 30100, Spain
来源
PLANT BIOSYSTEMS | 2011年 / 145卷 / 03期
关键词
Chilling requirement; correlative inhibition; differentiation; endodormancy; flower bud; paradormancy; vegetative bud; FLOWER BUDS; PEACH-TREES; TEMPERATURE; APPLE; GROWTH; REST; INDUCTION; RELEASE; REQUIREMENTS; ENDODORMANCY;
D O I
10.1080/11263504.2011.559361
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The progression of the dormancy of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) vegetative and reproductive buds in the summer-winter period (June-March) was analysed with the single-node cutting method during two consecutive years in a Mediterranean climate. The progression of the mean time to budbreak (MTB) was studied. Low MTB values were obtained, which show endodormancy intensity under climatic conditions in the South East of Spain only reached a shallow level in apricot. The onset of bud dormancy occurred prior to the advent of chilling accumulation. Although an oscillating pattern on dormancy progression was observed, MTB increased progressively from summer until January and declined rapidly thereafter coinciding with dormancy breaking, although in 2006-2007, maximum endodormancy intensity was observed at beginning of October. Vegetative and reproductive buds showed a similar pattern of seasonal progression of MTB, although after flower differentiation (ca. September) vegetative buds always showed a deeper dormancy than reproductive buds. Autumn and early winter temperatures seem to play a crucial role over dormancy intensity and dormancy progression. A gradient of increasingly deep dormancy from shoot apex to base is suggested by the gradual increment of MTB in a basipetal direction, although it was influenced by the year.
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 605
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
AMLING HJ, 1980, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V105, P536
[2]   Induction and release of bud dormancy in woody perennials: A science comes of age [J].
Arora, R ;
Rowland, LJ ;
Tanino, K .
HORTSCIENCE, 2003, 38 (05) :911-921
[3]  
Baggiolini M., 1952, Revue Romande d'Agriculture. Viticulture et Arboriculture, V4, P29
[4]  
Bailey C.H., 1977, ACTA HORTIC, V85, P184, DOI DOI 10.17660/ACTAHORTIC.1981.85.41
[5]  
Bailey CH, 1978, ACTA HORTIC, V85, P184
[6]   BUD BREAK DELAY ON SINGLE NODE CUTTINGS AND BUD CAPACITY FOR NUCLEOTIDE ACCUMULATION AS PARAMETERS FOR ENDODORMANCY AND PARADORMANCY IN PEACH-TREES IN A TROPICAL CLIMATE [J].
BALANDIER, P ;
GENDRAUD, M ;
RAGEAU, R ;
BONHOMME, M ;
RICHARD, JP ;
PARISOT, E .
SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 1993, 55 (3-4) :249-261
[7]   LEAF BUD ENDODORMANCY RELEASE IN PEACH-TREES - EVALUATION OF TEMPERATURE MODELS IN TEMPERATE AND TROPICAL CLIMATES [J].
BALANDIER, P ;
BONHOMME, M ;
RAGEAU, R ;
CAPITAN, F ;
PARISOT, E .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1993, 67 (1-2) :95-113
[8]   DOMINANCE AMONG FRUITS SINKS AND THE SEARCH FOR A CORRELATIVE SIGNAL [J].
BANGERTH, F .
PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1989, 76 (04) :608-614
[9]  
Barnola P, 1991, BIOL DEV, P381
[10]   Influence of three contrasted climatic conditions on endodormant vegetative and floral peach buds: analyses of their intrinsic growth capacity and their potential sink strength compared with adjacent tissues [J].
Bonhomme, M ;
Rageau, R ;
Richard, JP ;
Erez, A ;
Gendraud, M .
SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 1999, 80 (3-4) :157-171