Accuracy Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Computed Tomography Angiography Using a Flow Experimental Model

被引:3
作者
Heo, Yeong-Cheol [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Hae-Kag [3 ]
Park, Cheol-Soo [4 ]
Cho, Jae-Hwan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hallym Univ Grad Studies, Dept Int Radiol Sci, Seoul 135841, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Hosp Gangdong, Dept Radiol, Seoul 134727, South Korea
[3] Soonchunhyang Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Asan 336745, South Korea
[4] Hallym Polytechn Univ, Dept Radiol Sci, Chunchon 200711, South Korea
关键词
magnetic resonance angiography; computed tomography angiography; flow phantom; vascular diameter; MAXIMUM INTENSITY PROJECTION; FLIGHT MR-ANGIOGRAPHY; CT ANGIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.4283/JMAG.2015.20.1.040
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This study investigated the accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) in terms of reflecting the actual vascular length. Three-dimensional time of flight (3D TOF) MRA, 3D contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA, volume-rendering after CTA and maximum intensity projection were investigated using a flow model phantom with a diameter of 2.11 mm and area of 0.26 cm(2). 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla devices were used for 3D TOF MRA and 3D CE MRA. CTA was investigated using 16 and 64 channel CT scanners, and the images were transmitted and reconstructed by volume-rendering and maximum intensity projection, followed by conduit length measurement as described above. The smallest 3D TOF MRA measure was 2.51 +/- 0.12 mm with a flow velocity of 40 cm/s using the 3.0 Tesla apparatus, and 2.57 +/- 0.07 mm with a velocity of 71.5 cm/s using the 1.5 Tesla apparatus; both images were magnified from the actual measurement of 2.11 mm. The measurement with the 16 channel CT scanner was smaller (3.83 +/- 0.37 mm) than the reconstructed image on maximum intensity projection. The images from CTA from examination apparatus and reconstruction technique were all larger than the actual measurement.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 46
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] CT angiography: In vitro comparison of five reconstruction methods
    Addis, KA
    Hopper, KD
    Iyriboz, TA
    Liu, Y
    Wise, SW
    Kasales, CJ
    Blebea, JS
    Mauger, DT
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 177 (05) : 1171 - 1176
  • [2] Beslic S., 2004, RADIOL ONCOL, V38, P5
  • [3] Effects of stent sizing on endothelial and vessel wall stress: potential mechanisms for in-stent restenosis
    Chen, Henry Y.
    Hermiller, James
    Sinha, Anjan K.
    Sturek, Michael
    Zhu, Luoding
    Kassab, Ghassan S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 106 (05) : 1686 - 1691
  • [4] Choi C. K., 1997, J KOREAN RADIOL SOC, V36, P729
  • [5] Comparison of 3D TOF-MRA and 3D CE-MRA at 3T for imaging of intracranial aneurysms
    Cirillo, Mario
    Scomazzoni, Francesco
    Cirillo, Luigi
    Cadioli, Marcello
    Simionato, Franco
    Iadanza, Antonella
    Kirchin, Miles
    Righi, Claudio
    Anzalone, Nicoletta
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (12) : E853 - E859
  • [6] Volume rendering versus maximum intensity projection in CT angiography: What works best, when, and why
    Fishman, Elliot K.
    Ney, Derek R.
    Heath, David G.
    Corl, Frank M.
    Horton, Karen M.
    Johnson, Pamela T.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2006, 26 (03) : 905 - U282
  • [7] Maximum intensity projection of cranial computed tomography data for dental identification
    Jackowski, C
    Aghayev, E
    Sonnenschein, M
    Dirnhofer, R
    Thali, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2006, 120 (03) : 165 - 167
  • [8] Jeon H. J., 2003, J KOREAN NEUROSURG S, V33, P345
  • [9] Kim K. K., 2005, KOR J CEREBROVASCULA, V7, P12
  • [10] Kim Y. G., 2013, MRI PRACTICE