Diffusion-weighted imaging or dynamic contrast-enhanced curve: a retrospective analysis of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-based differential diagnoses of benign and malignant breast lesions

被引:27
作者
Yang, Xiaoping [1 ]
Dong, Mengshi [1 ]
Li, Shu [1 ]
Chai, Ruimei [1 ]
Zhang, Zheng [1 ]
Li, Nan [1 ]
Zhang, Lina [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 155 Nanjing St, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; KINETIC-ANALYSIS; CATEGORY; 4; MRI; ACCURACY; CRITERIA; CANCER; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-020-06883-w
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the diagnostic performance of models based on a combination of contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) or time-intensity curves (TIC) in diagnosing malignancies of breast lesions. Methods A double-blind retrospective study was conducted in 328 patients (254 for training and the following 74 for validation) who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of the breast with pathological results. Two score models, the DWI model (apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) + morphology + enhanced information) and the TIC model (TIC + morphology + enhanced information), were established with binary logistic regression for mass and non-mass enhancements (NMEs) in the training set. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were compared between the two models (DWI model vs. TIC model); p < 0.05 was considered as statistically different. External validation was used. Results In the training set, the sensitivities, specificities, and AUCs of the DWI/TIC model were 95.2%/95.8%, 70.8%/47.9%, and 0.932/0.891 for masses, and 94.2%/90.4%, 47.4%/47.4%, and 0.798 (95% CI, 0.686-0.884)/0.802 (95% CI, 0.691-0.887) for NMEs, respectively. The AUC of the DWI model was significantly higher than that of the TIC model (p < 0.05) for masses. In the validation set, the AUCs of the DWI/TIC model were 0.896/0.861 for masses (p < 0.05) and 0.936/0.836 for NMEs (p > 0.05). Conclusions Combined with CE MRI, the DWI model was superior or equal to the TIC model in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:4795 / 4805
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in the activity staging of terminal ileum Crohn's disease [J].
Wu, Yin-Chen ;
Xiao, Ze-Bin ;
Lin, Xue-Hua ;
Zheng, Xian-Ying ;
Cao, Dai-Rong ;
Zhang, Zhong-Shuai .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 26 (39) :6057-6073
[42]   High-Resolution Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Sinonasal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [J].
Wang, Feng ;
Sha, Yan ;
Zhao, Menglong ;
Wan, Hailin ;
Zhang, Fang ;
Cheng, Yushu ;
Tang, Wenlin .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2017, 41 (02) :199-205
[43]   Differential diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in non-cystic lesions in floor of the mouth [J].
Yuan, Ying ;
Jiang, Mengda ;
Wu, Lizhong ;
Tao, Xiaofeng .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 48 (03)
[44]   Classification of breast mass lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging by a computer-assisted diagnosis system based on quantitative analysis [J].
Yin, Jiandong ;
Yang, Jiawen ;
Jiang, Zejun .
ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 17 (03) :2623-2630
[45]   Radiomic and Artificial Intelligence Analysis with Textural Metrics Extracted by Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Dynamic Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Breast Malignant Lesions [J].
Fusco, Roberta ;
Di Bernardo, Elio ;
Piccirillo, Adele ;
Rubulotta, Maria Rosaria ;
Petrosino, Teresa ;
Barretta, Maria Luisa ;
Raso, Mauro Mattace ;
Vallone, Paolo ;
Raiano, Concetta ;
Di Giacomo, Raimondo ;
Siani, Claudio ;
Avino, Franca ;
Scognamiglio, Giosue ;
Di Bonito, Maurizio ;
Granata, Vincenza ;
Petrillo, Antonella .
CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (03) :1947-1966
[46]   Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer [J].
Kim, Eun Young ;
Youn, Inyoung ;
Lee, Kwan Ho ;
Yun, Ji-Sup ;
Park, Yong Lai ;
Park, Chan Heun ;
Moon, Juhee ;
Choi, Seon Hyeong ;
Choi, Yoon Jung ;
Ham, Soo-Youn ;
Kook, Shin Ho .
JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2018, 21 (04) :453-462
[47]   Preoperative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings for Prediction of Lymphovascular Invasion of the Lesions in Node-Negative Invasive Breast Cancer [J].
Bilge, Almila ;
Bilgin, Ezel ;
Bulut, Zarife ;
Bostanci, Isil ;
Bilgin, Erkan .
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2024, 75 (02) :386-396
[48]   The diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A meta-analysis [J].
Li, Zhifan ;
Li, Jinkui ;
Lu, Xingru ;
Qu, Mengmeng ;
Tian, Jinhui ;
Lei, Junqiang .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 143
[49]   Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Yang, Lu ;
Tan, Yuchuan ;
Dan, Hanli ;
Hu, Lin ;
Zhang, Jiuquan .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2021, 62 (09) :1238-1247
[50]   Discrimination of Malignant and Benign Breast Masses Using Computer-Aided Diagnosis from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging [J].
Ikizceli, Turkan ;
Karacavus, Seyhan ;
Erbay, Hasan ;
Yurttakal, Ahmet Hasim .
HASEKI TIP BULTENI-MEDICAL BULLETIN OF HASEKI, 2021, 59 (03) :190-195