Diffusion-weighted imaging or dynamic contrast-enhanced curve: a retrospective analysis of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-based differential diagnoses of benign and malignant breast lesions

被引:27
作者
Yang, Xiaoping [1 ]
Dong, Mengshi [1 ]
Li, Shu [1 ]
Chai, Ruimei [1 ]
Zhang, Zheng [1 ]
Li, Nan [1 ]
Zhang, Lina [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 155 Nanjing St, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; KINETIC-ANALYSIS; CATEGORY; 4; MRI; ACCURACY; CRITERIA; CANCER; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-020-06883-w
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the diagnostic performance of models based on a combination of contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) or time-intensity curves (TIC) in diagnosing malignancies of breast lesions. Methods A double-blind retrospective study was conducted in 328 patients (254 for training and the following 74 for validation) who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of the breast with pathological results. Two score models, the DWI model (apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) + morphology + enhanced information) and the TIC model (TIC + morphology + enhanced information), were established with binary logistic regression for mass and non-mass enhancements (NMEs) in the training set. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were compared between the two models (DWI model vs. TIC model); p < 0.05 was considered as statistically different. External validation was used. Results In the training set, the sensitivities, specificities, and AUCs of the DWI/TIC model were 95.2%/95.8%, 70.8%/47.9%, and 0.932/0.891 for masses, and 94.2%/90.4%, 47.4%/47.4%, and 0.798 (95% CI, 0.686-0.884)/0.802 (95% CI, 0.691-0.887) for NMEs, respectively. The AUC of the DWI model was significantly higher than that of the TIC model (p < 0.05) for masses. In the validation set, the AUCs of the DWI/TIC model were 0.896/0.861 for masses (p < 0.05) and 0.936/0.836 for NMEs (p > 0.05). Conclusions Combined with CE MRI, the DWI model was superior or equal to the TIC model in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:4795 / 4805
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Characterization of breast cancer subtypes based on quantitative assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity using dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Jin Joo Kim ;
Jin You Kim ;
Hie Bum Suh ;
Lee Hwangbo ;
Nam Kyung Lee ;
Suk Kim ;
Ji Won Lee ;
Ki Seok Choo ;
Kyung Jin Nam ;
Taewoo Kang ;
Heeseung Park .
European Radiology, 2022, 32 :822-833
[32]   How to manage type 2 curve dilemma in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: diffusion-weighted imaging or early phase enhancement kinetics? [J].
Ozturk, Funda Ulu ;
Tezcan, Sehnaz ;
Uslu, Nihal .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2024, 65 (04) :341-349
[33]   A multiparametric approach to diagnosing breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging and ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [J].
Ohashi, Akane ;
Kataoka, Masako ;
Iima, Mami ;
Kanao, Shotaro ;
Honda, Maya ;
Urushibata, Yuta ;
Nickel, Marcel Dominik ;
Kishimoto, Ayami Ohno ;
Ota, Rie ;
Toi, Masakazu ;
Togashi, Kaori .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 71 :154-160
[34]   Assessment of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of malignant from benign orbital masses [J].
Yuan, Ying ;
Kuai, Xin-Ping ;
Chen, Xiao-Song ;
Tao, Xiao-Feng .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (09) :1506-1511
[35]   Role of Diffusion-weighted and Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differentiating Activity of Ankylosing Spondylitis [J].
Zhao, Ying-Hua ;
Cao, Yan-Yan ;
Zhang, Qun ;
Mei, Ying-Jie ;
Xiao, Ji-Jie ;
Hu, Shao-Yong ;
Li, Wei ;
Li, Shao-Lin .
CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 130 (11) :1303-1308
[36]   High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging compared with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with regard to image quality and assessment of breast cancer morphology [J].
Metin, Yavuz ;
Metin, Nurgul Orhan ;
Kul, Sibel ;
Tasci, Filiz ;
Ozdemir, Oguzhan ;
Kupeli, Ali .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 29 (02) :251-259
[37]   Evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging for predicting muscular hyperplasia/hypertrophy in Crohn's disease [J].
Yu, Lin ;
Hu, Shun ;
Huang, Fu-Chen ;
Wu, Yin-Chen ;
Zheng, Xian-Ying .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (05) :1714-1724
[38]   Diffusion-weighted (DW) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for monitoring anticancer therapy [J].
Anwar R. Padhani ;
Aftab Alam Khan .
Targeted Oncology, 2010, 5 :39-52
[39]   Diffusion-weighted (DW) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for monitoring anticancer therapy [J].
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
Khan, Aftab Alam .
TARGETED ONCOLOGY, 2010, 5 (01) :39-52
[40]   Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the "Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System" for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions [J].
Pinker, K. ;
Bickel, H. ;
Helbich, T. H. ;
Gruber, S. ;
Dubsky, P. ;
Pluschnig, U. ;
Rudas, M. ;
Bago-Horvath, Z. ;
Weber, M. ;
Trattnig, S. ;
Bogner, W. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (07) :1791-1802