Diffusion-weighted imaging or dynamic contrast-enhanced curve: a retrospective analysis of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-based differential diagnoses of benign and malignant breast lesions

被引:25
|
作者
Yang, Xiaoping [1 ]
Dong, Mengshi [1 ]
Li, Shu [1 ]
Chai, Ruimei [1 ]
Zhang, Zheng [1 ]
Li, Nan [1 ]
Zhang, Lina [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 155 Nanjing St, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; KINETIC-ANALYSIS; CATEGORY; 4; MRI; ACCURACY; CRITERIA; CANCER; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-020-06883-w
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the diagnostic performance of models based on a combination of contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) or time-intensity curves (TIC) in diagnosing malignancies of breast lesions. Methods A double-blind retrospective study was conducted in 328 patients (254 for training and the following 74 for validation) who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of the breast with pathological results. Two score models, the DWI model (apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) + morphology + enhanced information) and the TIC model (TIC + morphology + enhanced information), were established with binary logistic regression for mass and non-mass enhancements (NMEs) in the training set. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were compared between the two models (DWI model vs. TIC model); p < 0.05 was considered as statistically different. External validation was used. Results In the training set, the sensitivities, specificities, and AUCs of the DWI/TIC model were 95.2%/95.8%, 70.8%/47.9%, and 0.932/0.891 for masses, and 94.2%/90.4%, 47.4%/47.4%, and 0.798 (95% CI, 0.686-0.884)/0.802 (95% CI, 0.691-0.887) for NMEs, respectively. The AUC of the DWI model was significantly higher than that of the TIC model (p < 0.05) for masses. In the validation set, the AUCs of the DWI/TIC model were 0.896/0.861 for masses (p < 0.05) and 0.936/0.836 for NMEs (p > 0.05). Conclusions Combined with CE MRI, the DWI model was superior or equal to the TIC model in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:4795 / 4805
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diffusion-weighted imaging or dynamic contrast-enhanced curve: a retrospective analysis of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging–based differential diagnoses of benign and malignant breast lesions
    Xiaoping Yang
    Mengshi Dong
    Shu Li
    Ruimei Chai
    Zheng Zhang
    Nan Li
    Lina Zhang
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 4795 - 4805
  • [2] Effectivity of combined diffusion-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced MRI in malignant and benign breast lesions
    Yadav, Pratiksha
    Chauhan, Surbhi
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 83 : E82 - E93
  • [3] Investigation of imaging features in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of benign and malignant breast lesions
    Kubota, Kazunori
    Fujioka, Tomoyuki
    Tateishi, Ukihide
    Mori, Mio
    Yashima, Yuka
    Yamaga, Emi
    Katsuta, Leona
    Yamaguchi, Ken
    Tozaki, Mitsuhiro
    Sasaki, Michiro
    Uematsu, Takayoshi
    Monzawa, Shuichi
    Isomoto, Ichiro
    Suzuki, Mizuka
    Satake, Hiroko
    Nakahara, Hiroshi
    Goto, Mariko
    Kikuchi, Mari
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 42 (07) : 720 - 730
  • [4] Potential of Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Characterization of Breast Lesions Intraindividual Comparison With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    Bickel, Hubert
    Spick, Claudio
    Wengert, Georg
    Woitek, Ramona
    Kapetas, Panagiotis
    Clauser, Paola
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Pinker, Katja
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2018, 53 (04) : 229 - 235
  • [5] Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Oncology in R
    Whitcher, Brandon
    Schmid, Volker J.
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2011, 44 (05): : 1 - 29
  • [6] The Role of Combined Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Differentiating Malignant From Benign Breast Lesions Presenting Washout Curve
    Tezcan, Sehnaz
    Ozturk, Funda Ulu
    Uslu, Nihal
    Akcay, Eda Yilmaz
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2021, 72 (03): : 460 - 469
  • [7] Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of the breast with magnetic resonance
    Cron, GO
    Santyr, G
    Kelcz, F
    IMTC/97 - IEEE INSTRUMENTATION & MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE: SENSING, PROCESSING, NETWORKING, PROCEEDINGS VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 1354 - 1356
  • [8] Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of papillary breast lesions
    Yildiz, Seyma
    Toprak, Huseyin
    Ersoy, Yeliz Emine
    Malya, Fatma Umit
    Bakan, Ayse Ahsen
    Aralasmak, Ayse
    Gucin, Zuhal
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (02): : 176 - 179
  • [9] Discrimination of benign and malignant breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using deep learning
    Zhang, Ming
    He, Guangyuan
    Pan, Changjie
    Yun, Bing
    Shen, Dong
    Meng, Mingzhu
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 19 (06) : 1589 - 1596
  • [10] Monitoring ankylosing spondylitis therapy by dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Nataša Gašperšič
    Igor Serša
    Vladimir Jevtič
    Matija Tomšič
    Sonja Praprotnik
    Skeletal Radiology, 2008, 37 : 123 - 131