Pharmacologic inhibition of ATR and ATM offers clinically important distinctions to enhancing platinum or radiation response in ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer cells

被引:77
作者
Teng, Pang-ning [1 ]
Bateman, Nicholas W. [1 ]
Darcy, Kathleen M. [1 ]
Hamilton, Chad A. [1 ,2 ]
Maxwell, George Larry [1 ,3 ]
Bakkenist, Christopher J. [4 ,5 ]
Conrads, Thomas P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Womens Hlth Integrated Res Ctr Inova Hlth Syst, Gynecol Canc Ctr Excellence, Dept Def, Annandale, VA 22003 USA
[2] Walter Reed Natl Mil Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Gynecol Oncol Serv, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] Inova Fairfax Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fairfax, VA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Biol, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Pharmacol & Chem Biol, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
关键词
DNA damage repair response; ATR; ATM; Gynecologic cancer; Cisplatin resistance; Ionizing radiation; P53; GENE; DNA; KINASE; REPAIR; IDENTIFICATION; PATHWAYS; SURVIVAL; PHOSPHORYLATION; RECOMBINATION; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.035
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. Significant reductions in gynecologic (GYN) cancer mortality and morbidity require treatments that prevent and reverse resistance to chemotherapy and radiation. The objective of this study was to determine if pharmacologic inhibition of key DNA damage response kinases in GYN cancers would enhance cell killing by platinum-based chemotherapy and radiation. Methods. A panel of human ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancer cell lines were treated with platinum drugs or ionizing radiation (IR) along with small molecule pharmacological kinase inhibitors of Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and ATM and Rad-3-related (ATR). Results. Pharmacologic inhibition of ATR significantly enhanced platinum drug response in all GYN cancer cell lines tested, whereas inhibition of ATM did not enhance the response to platinum drugs. Co-inhibition of ATM and ATR did not enhance platinum kill beyond that observed by inhibition of ATR alone. By contrast, inhibiting either ATR or ATM enhanced the response to IR in all GYN cancer cells, with further enhancement achieved with co-inhibition. Conclusions. These studies highlight actionable mechanisms operative in GYN cancer cells with potential to maximize response of platinum agents and radiation in newly diagnosed as well as recurrent gynecologic cancers. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 561
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Clinicopathological and functional significance of XRCC1 expression in ovarian cancer [J].
Abdel-Fatah, Tarek ;
Sultana, Rebeka ;
Abbotts, Rachel ;
Hawkes, Claire ;
Seedhouse, Claire ;
Chan, Stephen ;
Madhusudan, Srinivasan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 132 (12) :2778-2786
[2]   RNAi screening of the kinome identifies modulators of cisplatin response in ovarian cancer cells [J].
Arora, Shilpi ;
Bisanz, Kristen M. ;
Peralta, Lourdes A. ;
Basu, Gargi D. ;
Choudhary, Ashish ;
Tibes, Raoul ;
Azorsa, David O. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 118 (03) :220-227
[3]  
Barakat R R., 2013, Principles and Practice of Gynecologic Oncology, V6th
[4]   Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma [J].
Bell, D. ;
Berchuck, A. ;
Birrer, M. ;
Chien, J. ;
Cramer, D. W. ;
Dao, F. ;
Dhir, R. ;
DiSaia, P. ;
Gabra, H. ;
Glenn, P. ;
Godwin, A. K. ;
Gross, J. ;
Hartmann, L. ;
Huang, M. ;
Huntsman, D. G. ;
Iacocca, M. ;
Imielinski, M. ;
Kalloger, S. ;
Karlan, B. Y. ;
Levine, D. A. ;
Mills, G. B. ;
Morrison, C. ;
Mutch, D. ;
Olvera, N. ;
Orsulic, S. ;
Park, K. ;
Petrelli, N. ;
Rabeno, B. ;
Rader, J. S. ;
Sikic, B. I. ;
Smith-McCune, K. ;
Sood, A. K. ;
Bowtell, D. ;
Penny, R. ;
Testa, J. R. ;
Chang, K. ;
Dinh, H. H. ;
Drummond, J. A. ;
Fowler, G. ;
Gunaratne, P. ;
Hawes, A. C. ;
Kovar, C. L. ;
Lewis, L. R. ;
Morgan, M. B. ;
Newsham, I. F. ;
Santibanez, J. ;
Reid, J. G. ;
Trevino, L. R. ;
Wu, Y. -Q. ;
Wang, M. .
NATURE, 2011, 474 (7353) :609-615
[5]   ATM Kinase Inhibition Preferentially Sensitizes p53-Mutant Glioma to Ionizing Radiation [J].
Biddlestone-Thorpe, Laura ;
Sajjad, Muhammad ;
Rosenberg, Elizabeth ;
Beckta, Jason M. ;
Valerie, Nicholas C. K. ;
Tokarz, Mary ;
Adams, Bret R. ;
Wagner, Alison F. ;
Khalil, Ashraf ;
Gilfor, Donna ;
Golding, Sarah E. ;
Deb, Sumitra ;
Temesi, David G. ;
Lau, Alan ;
O'Connor, Mark J. ;
Choe, Kevin S. ;
Parada, Luis F. ;
Lim, Sang Kyun ;
Mukhopadhyay, Nitai D. ;
Valerie, Kristoffer .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 19 (12) :3189-3200
[6]   Selective Chk1 inhibitors differentially sensitize p53-deficient cancer cells to cancer therapeutics [J].
Chen, Zehan ;
Xiao, Zhan ;
Gul, Wen-zhen ;
Xue, John ;
Bui, Mai H. ;
Kovar, Peter ;
Li, Gaoquan ;
Wang, Gary ;
Tao, Zhi-Fu ;
Tong, Yunsong ;
Lin, Nan-Horng ;
Sham, Hing L. ;
Wang, Jean Y. J. ;
Sowin, Thomas J. ;
Rosenberg, Saul H. ;
Zhang, Haiying .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 119 (12) :2784-2794
[7]   The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives [J].
Ciccia, Alberto ;
Elledge, Stephen J. .
MOLECULAR CELL, 2010, 40 (02) :179-204
[8]   Targeting ATR in vivo using the novel inhibitor VE-822 results in selective sensitization of pancreatic tumors to radiation [J].
Fokas, E. ;
Prevo, R. ;
Pollard, J. R. ;
Reaper, P. M. ;
Charlton, P. A. ;
Cornelissen, B. ;
Vallis, K. A. ;
Hammond, E. M. ;
Olcina, M. M. ;
McKenna, W. Gillies ;
Muschel, R. J. ;
Brunner, T. B. .
CELL DEATH & DISEASE, 2012, 3 :e441-e441
[9]   Targeting DNA repair mechanisms in cancer [J].
Furgason, John M. ;
Bahassi, El Mustapha .
PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2013, 137 (03) :298-308
[10]   ATR kinase activation in G1 phase facilitates the repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage [J].
Gamper, Armin M. ;
Rofougaran, Reza ;
Watkins, Simon C. ;
Greenberger, Joel S. ;
Beumer, Jan H. ;
Bakkenist, Christopher J. .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2013, 41 (22) :10334-10344