Listening to Music during Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy Decreases Anxiety, Pain and Dissatisfaction in Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:37
作者
Chang, Yun Hee [1 ]
Oh, Tae Hoon [2 ]
Lee, Jae Whan [2 ]
Park, Seung Chol [2 ]
Seo, Ill Young [2 ]
Jeong, Hee Jong [2 ]
Kwon, Whi-An [3 ]
机构
[1] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Cheongju, South Korea
[2] Wonkwang Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Inst Wonkwang Med Sci,Wonkwang Univ Hosp, Iksan, South Korea
[3] Wonkwang Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Inst Wonkwang Med Sci,Sanbon Hosp, Gunpo 435040, Gyeonggi, South Korea
关键词
Music; Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy; Pain; CONTROLLED SEDATION; RELAXATION MUSIC; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; COLONOSCOPY; TOLERANCE; PERFORMANCE; ANESTHESIA; THERAPY; STRESS; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1159/000368420
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether listening to music during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided 12-core needle prostate biopsy decreases anxiety, pain and dissatisfaction among patients and results in a more comfortable and better tolerated procedure. Patients and Methods: 76 male patients who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy between March 2013 and June 2014 were randomized into the following groups: no music (group I, n = 38) or classical music (group II, n = 38) during the procedure. Before TRUS-guided prostate biopsy, lidocaine gel was instilled into the rectum. Patient anxiety levels were quantified using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. A visual analog scale (0-10) was used for self-assessment of satisfaction, discomfort and willingness among patients to have a repeat TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Results: Demographic characteristics, mean age, procedure duration and procedure indications did not differ statistically between the two groups. The mean anxiety level and mean pain score of group II were significantly lower than those of group I (p = 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Group II also had a significantly higher mean satisfaction score than group I (p = 0.007). Before the procedure, heart rate and systolic blood pressure were similar in groups I and II; however, after the procedure, levels were lower in group II than in group I (heart rate, p = 0.014; systolic blood pressure, p = 0.011). Conclusion: Listening to music during TRUS-guided prostate biopsy significantly reduced patients' feelings of pain, discomfort and dissatisfaction. Music can serve as a simple, inexpensive and effective adjunct to sedation during TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. We recommend playing music during TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. (C) 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 341
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Anxiety during the performance of colonoscopies:: modification using music therapy [J].
Andrada, JMLC ;
Vidal, AA ;
Aguilar-Tablada, TC ;
Reina, IG ;
Silva, L ;
Guinaldo, AR ;
De la Rosa, JL ;
Cibaja, IH ;
Alamo, AF ;
Roldàn, AB .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2004, 16 (12) :1381-1386
[2]   Effect of relaxation music on patient tolerance of gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures [J].
Bampton, P ;
Draper, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 25 (01) :343-345
[3]   RELAXATION AND MUSICAL PROGRAMMING AS MEANS OF REDUCING PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS DURING DENTAL PROCEDURES [J].
CORAH, NL ;
GALE, EN ;
PACE, LF ;
SEYREK, SK .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1981, 103 (02) :232-234
[4]  
Crundwell MC, 1999, BJU INT, V83, P792
[5]   MUSIC IMPROVES PATIENT COMFORT LEVEL DURING OUTPATIENT BRONCHOSCOPY [J].
DUBOIS, JM ;
BARTTER, T ;
PRATTER, MR .
CHEST, 1995, 108 (01) :129-130
[6]  
ELLIOTT D, 1994, HEART LUNG, V23, P27
[7]   Burn pain and anxiety: The use of music relaxation during rehabilitation [J].
Ferguson, SL ;
Voll, KV .
JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & REHABILITATION, 2004, 25 (01) :8-14
[8]  
Harikumar R, 2006, Indian J Gastroenterol, V25, P3
[9]  
Heitz L, 1992, J Post Anesth Nurs, V7, P22
[10]   Patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate [J].
Irani, J ;
Fournier, F ;
Bon, D ;
Gremmo, E ;
Dore, B ;
Aubert, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 79 (04) :608-610