Is this person with dementia (currently) competent to request euthanasia? A complicated and underexplored question

被引:5
作者
Kim, Scott Y. H. [1 ]
Mangino, Dominic [1 ]
Nicolini, Marie [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NIH, Dept Bioeth, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] KHLeuven, Interfac Ctr Biomed Eth & Law, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
euthanasia; dementia; competence; incompetence; living wills; advance directives; capacity; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; DECISION-MAKING; CAPACITY; PARTICIPATION; CONSENT;
D O I
10.1136/medethics-2020-106091
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In euthanasia and/or assisted suicide (EAS) of persons with dementia, the controversy has mostly focused on decisionally incapable persons with very advanced dementia for whom the procedure must be based on a written advance euthanasia directive. This focus on advance euthanasia directive-based EAS has been accompanied by scant attention to the issue of decision-making capacity assessment of persons with dementia who are being evaluated for concurrent request EAS. We build on a previous analysis of concurrent request EAS cases from the Netherlands, which showed that many such cases involve persons with significant cognitive impairment. We use illustrative cases to describe the difficulty of determining decisional capacity in persons whose stage of dementia falls between severely impaired and mildly impaired. We show that the Dutch practice of capacity assessment in such dementia cases is difficult to reconcile with the widely accepted functional model of capacity-a model explicitly endorsed by the Dutch euthanasia review committees. We discuss why such deviations from the standard functional model might be occurring, as well as their ethical implications for dementia EAS policy and practice.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: A Guide for Physicians and Other Health Professionals
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, GUIDE ASSESSING COMP
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Re T (adult: refusal of medical treatment
[4]   Assessment of patients' competence to consent to treatment [J].
Appelbaum, Paul S. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (18) :1834-1840
[5]   First prosecution of a Dutch doctor since the Euthanasia Act of 2002: what does the verdict mean? [J].
Asscher, Eva Constance Alida ;
van de Vathorst, Suzanne .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2020, 46 (02) :71-75
[6]  
Buchanan AllenE., 1989, DECIDING OTHERS ETHI
[7]  
Court of the Hague, 2019, CAS NUMB 09 837356 1
[8]   Capacity Evaluations of Psychiatric Patients Requesting Assisted Death in the Netherlands [J].
Doernberg, Samuel N. ;
Peteet, John R. ;
Kim, Scott Y. H. .
PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2016, 57 (06) :556-565
[9]   Dementia, intelligence, and the competence to complete advance directives [J].
Fazel, S ;
Hope, T ;
Jacoby, R .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9172) :48-48
[10]   The role of advance euthanasia directives as an aid to communication and shared decision-making in dementia [J].
Hertogh, C. M. P. M. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2009, 35 (02) :100-103