Comparison of Four Chemometric Techniques for Estimating Leaf Nitrogen Concentrations in Winter Wheat (Triticum Aestivum) Based on Hyperspectral Features

被引:30
作者
Li, Zh. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nie, Ch. [2 ,3 ]
Wei, Ch. [1 ]
Xu, X. [2 ,3 ]
Song, X. [2 ,3 ]
Wang, J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Inst Agr Remote Sensing & Informat Applicat, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Engn Res Ctr Informat Technol Agr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Agr, Key Lab Agriinformat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Acad Agr & Forestry Sci, Beijing Res Ctr Agr Stand & Testing, 11 Shuguang Huayuan Mid Rd, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
hyperspectral remote sensing; stepwise multiple linear regression; partial least squares regression; artificial neural network; support vector machines; REFLECTANCE; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1007/s10812-016-0276-3
中图分类号
O433 [光谱学];
学科分类号
0703 ; 070302 ;
摘要
Four chemometric techniques for estimating LNC in winter wheat were compared by spectral features. The predictive power and impact of sample size were evaluated. Key results include: (1) partial least squares regression (PLSR) and support vector machines regression (SVR) performed better than the other two methods, with coefficient of determination (r (2)) values in the calibration set of 0.82 and 0.81 and the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) values in the validation set of 5.48 and 5.94%, respectively; (2) the lowest accuracy was achieved using stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR), with r (2) and NRMSE values of 0.78 and 6.52%, respectively; (3) the predictive power of the back propagation neural network (BPN) was enhanced as sample size increased. Sample size less than 80 is not recommended when using BPN. These results suggest that PLSR and SVR are preferred choices to estimate LNC in winter wheat, and BPN is recommended when a sufficient sample size is available.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 247
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Comparative analysis of three chemometric techniques for the spectroradiometric assessment of canopy chlorophyll content in winter wheat [J].
Atzberger, Clement ;
Guerif, Martine ;
Baret, Frederic ;
Werner, Willy .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2010, 73 (02) :165-173
[2]   REMOTE-SENSING OF FOLIAR CHEMISTRY [J].
CURRAN, PJ .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1989, 30 (03) :271-278
[3]   Support vector machines regression for retrieval of leaf area index from multiangle imaging spectroradiometer [J].
Durbha, Surya S. ;
King, Roger L. ;
Younan, Nicolas H. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 107 (1-2) :348-361
[4]   Monitoring leaf nitrogen status with hyperspectral reflectance in wheat [J].
Feng, W. ;
Yao, X. ;
Zhu, Y. ;
Tian, Y. C. ;
Cao, Wx .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2008, 28 (03) :394-404
[5]   Reflectance measurement of canopy biomass and nitrogen status in wheat crops using normalized difference vegetation indices and partial least squares regression [J].
Hansen, PM ;
Schjoerring, JK .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 86 (04) :542-553
[6]   Predicting grain yield and protein content in winter wheat and spring barley using repeated canopy reflectance measurements and partial least squares regression [J].
Hansen, PM ;
Jorgensen, JR ;
Thomsen, A .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2002, 139 :307-318
[7]   SWIR-based spectral indices for assessing nitrogen content in potato fields [J].
Herrmann, I. ;
Karnieli, A. ;
Bonfil, D. J. ;
Cohen, Y. ;
Alchanatis, V. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 31 (19) :5127-5143
[8]   PROSPECT plus SAIL models: A review of use for vegetation characterization [J].
Jacquemoud, Stephane ;
Verhoef, Wout ;
Baret, Frederic ;
Bacour, Cedric ;
Zarco-Tejada, Pablo J. ;
Asner, Gregory P. ;
Francois, Christophe ;
Ustin, Susan L. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 113 :S56-S66
[9]   CALIBRATION OF PROCESS-ORIENTED MODELS [J].
JANSSEN, PHM ;
HEUBERGER, PSC .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1995, 83 (1-2) :55-66
[10]   Application of support vector machine technology for weed and nitrogen stress detection in corn [J].
Karimi, Y ;
Prasher, SO ;
Patel, RM ;
Kim, SH .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2006, 51 (1-2) :99-109