Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration

被引:28
作者
Fu, QJ [1 ]
机构
[1] House Ear Res Inst, Dept Audiory Implants & Percept, Los Angeles, CA 90057 USA
关键词
cochlear implants; loudness balance; loudness growth; stimulation rate; electrode configuration; amplitude mapping;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2004.10.004
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
In cochlear implant speech processor design, acoustic amplitudes are mapped to electric currents with the intention of preserving loudness relationships across electrodes. Many parameters may affect the growth of loudness with electrical stimulation. The present study measured the effects of stimulation rate and electrode configuration on loudness growth in six Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users. Loudness balance functions were measured for stimuli that differed in terms of stimulation rate, electrode coil figuration and electrode location: a 2-alternative, forced-choice adaptive procedure (double-staircase) was used. First, subjects adaptively adjusted the amplitude of a 100-pulse-per-second (pps) pulse train to match the loudness of a 1000-pps standard Pulse train. For a range of reference stimulation levels, the loudness of the 100-pps stimulus was matched to that of the 1000-pps standard stimulus: loudness balancing was performed for three electrode pairs [(20,22), (1 3) (1,22)]. The results showed that the loudness balance functions between the 100- and 1000-pps stimulation rates were highly subject-dependent. Some subjects' loudness balance functions were logarithmic, while others' were nearly linear. Loudness balance functions were also measured across electrode locations [(20,22) vs. (1,3)] for two stimulation rates (100, 1000 pps). Results showed that the loudness balance functions between the apical and basal electrode pairs highly depended on the stimulation rate. For all subjects, at the 1000-pps rate, the loudness balance functions between the two electrode locations were nearly linear; however, at the 100-pps rate, the loudness balance function was highly nonlinear in two out of six subjects. These results suggest that, for some cochlear implant patients, low-frequency stimulation may be processed differently at different electrode locations-, for these patients, acoustic-to-electric amplitude mapping may need to be sensitive to this place-dependent processing when relatively low stimulation rates Lire used. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential [J].
Abbas, PJ ;
Brown, CJ ;
Shallop, JK ;
Firszt, JB ;
Hughes, ML ;
Hong, SH ;
Staller, SJ .
EAR AND HEARING, 1999, 20 (01) :45-59
[2]  
BOEX CS, 1995, 1995 C IMPL AUD PROS, P57
[3]  
BOEX CS, 1997, 1997 C IMPL AUD PROS, P26
[4]   The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: Data from adults [J].
Brown, CJ ;
Hughes, ML ;
Luk, B ;
Abbas, PJ ;
Wolaver, A ;
Gervais, J .
EAR AND HEARING, 2000, 21 (02) :151-163
[5]   Influence of stimulus frequency on NRT recordings [J].
Charasse, B ;
Chanal, JM ;
Berger-Vachon, C ;
Collet, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (04) :236-244
[6]   Effects of stimulation mode on threshold and loudness growth in multielectrode cochlear implants [J].
Chatterjee, M .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1999, 105 (02) :850-860
[7]   LOUDNESS BALANCE BETWEEN ACOUSTIC AND ELECTRIC-STIMULATION BY A PATIENT WITH A MULTICHANNEL COCHLEAR IMPLANT [J].
DORMAN, MF ;
SMITH, L ;
PARKIN, JL .
EAR AND HEARING, 1993, 14 (04) :290-292
[8]  
Eddington D K, 1978, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, V87, P1
[9]   Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with the neural response telemetry capabilities of cochlear corporation's CI24M device [J].
Franck, KH ;
Norton, SJ .
EAR AND HEARING, 2001, 22 (04) :289-299
[10]   Effects of amplitude nonlinearity on phoneme recognition by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners [J].
Fu, QJ ;
Shannon, RV .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1998, 104 (05) :2570-2577