Mid-term outcomes after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric femoral fractures using the new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA)

被引:140
作者
Liu, Yake [1 ]
Tao, Ran [1 ]
Liu, Fan [1 ]
Wang, Youhua [1 ]
Zhou, Zhenyu [1 ]
Cao, Yi [1 ]
Wang, Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Nantong Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Nantong City 226001, Jiangsu Prov, Peoples R China
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2010年 / 41卷 / 08期
关键词
Peritrochanteric femoral fracture; Internal fixation; PFNA; SLIDING HIP SCREW; INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; PERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; GAMMA-NAILS; PLATE; FAILURE; TRIAL; FEMUR;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2010.03.020
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Controversy persists concerning the preferred treatment of peritrochanteric femoral fractures. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of the newly developed implants - proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) for the stabilisation of this type of fracture. Methods: Between April 2006 and March 2008, 169 patients with peritrochanteric femoral fractures were treated with PFNA. As many as 26 patients were excluded from the study. According to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) classification system, the remaining 143 fractures were classified as 19 cases of AO/OTA 31A1 fractures, 83 cases of 31A2 fractures, 28 cases of 31A3 fractures and 13 cases of 31A combined with proximal 32 fracture or separate proximal 32 fracture. The mean age of these patients was 67 years ( range, 20 - 93 years). The operative time, the overall. uoroscopy time, the duration of hospitalisation and the surgical complications were noted. Patients were followed up for a mean of 21 months ( range, 12 - 36 months). Functional outcomes were assessed according to the Harris hip scoring system. Results: Fifteen patients (10%) required open reduction. The mean duration of surgery ( from the beginning of close reduction to wound closure) was 72 min with a range between 45 and 170 min. The mean. uoroscopy time was 164 s with a range between 92 and 396 s. The mean time of hospital stay was 15 days. Postoperative X-rays showed a good or acceptable reduction in 134 cases (94%), and an ideal implant position in 131 cases (92%). There were 12 (8%) postoperative complications. All patients except one healed their fractures without any implant-specific complication ( bending, breaking of the implant, cut out of the PFNA blade, femoral head penetration of the blade or ipsilateral fractures of the femoral shaft at the tip of the implant). The average time to bone healing was 16 weeks ( range, 12 - 25 weeks). At the time of the latest follow-up, 106 patients (74%) were restored to their preoperative mobility. The mean Harris hip score was 84 points ( range, 46 - 100 points). A total of 106 patients ( 74%) had an excellent or good outcome. According to the patients and/or their caregivers, outcome was described as satisfactory in 120(84%) of the 143 patients, and 36(90%) of the 40 patients, who were more than 80 years old. Conclusion: The results suggest that PFNA is a very effective and safe method in the treatment of different patterns of peritrochanteric femoral fractures. The fixation is adequate to maintain reduction over time even in osteoporotic bones. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:810 / 817
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur [J].
Adams, CI ;
Robinson, CM ;
Court-Brown, CM ;
McQueen, MM .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2001, 15 (06) :394-400
[2]   The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric femoral fracture [J].
Al-yassari, G ;
Langstaff, RJ ;
Jones, JWM ;
Al-Lami, M .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2002, 33 (05) :395-399
[3]   Complications and technical problems with the gamma nail [J].
Albareda, J ;
Laderiga, A ;
Palanca, D ;
Paniagua, L ;
Seral, F .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 1996, 20 (01) :47-50
[4]  
[Anonymous], CLIN ORTHOP
[5]   The treatment of unstable, extracapsular hip fractures with the AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) - our first 60 cases [J].
Banan, H ;
Al-Sabti, A ;
Jimulia, T ;
Hart, AJ .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2002, 33 (05) :401-405
[6]   FIXATION OF INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES OF THE FEMUR - A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF THE GAMMA-NAIL AND THE DYNAMIC HIP SCREW [J].
BRIDLE, SH ;
PATEL, AD ;
BIRCHER, M ;
CALVERT, PT .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1991, 73 (02) :330-334
[7]   COMPARISON OF DYNAMIC HIP SCREW AND GAMMA-NAIL - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL [J].
BUTT, MS ;
KRIKLER, SJ ;
NAFIE, S ;
ALI, MS .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1995, 26 (09) :615-618
[8]   The trochanteric nail versus the sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric hip fractures: A review of 93 cases [J].
Crawford, CH ;
Malkani, AL ;
Cordray, S ;
Roberts, CS ;
Sligar, W .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 60 (02) :325-328
[9]   INTERTROCHANTERIC FEMORAL FRACTURES - MECHANICAL FAILURE AFTER INTERNAL-FIXATION [J].
DAVIS, TRC ;
SHER, JL ;
HORSMAN, A ;
SIMPSON, M ;
PORTER, BB ;
CHECKETTS, RG .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1990, 72 (01) :26-31
[10]  
Docquier P L, 2002, Acta Orthop Belg, V68, P251