Why are bathrooms inclusive if the stacks exclude? Systemic exclusion of trans and gender nonconforming persons in post-Trump academic librarianship

被引:12
作者
Wagner, Travis L. [1 ]
Crowley, Archie [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Lib & Informat Sci, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Dept Linguist, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
Academic libraries; Critical discourse analysis; Information organization; Linguistics; Queer theory; Gender nonconforming individuals; CRITICAL DISCOURSE; TRANSGENDER; QUEER; GAY; US;
D O I
10.1108/RSR-10-2019-0072
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to deploy a critical discourse analysis (CDA) to consider exclusionary practices enacted by academic libraries as evidenced through resource provision. Specifically, this paper looks at the inclusion of trans and gender-nonconforming (TGNC) individuals in library guides, TGNC naming practices in abstracts and the physical shelving of transgender studies texts. This paper concludes with a discussion of methods to overcome such exclusionary practices in the future. Design/methodology/approach This paper deploys CDA as informed by queer theory, affording a lens to consider how language and information are structured such that particular power dynamics emerge placing symbolic value on discursively normal identities. CDA helps illuminate when, how and why TGNC individuals remain excluded within academic librarianship practices. Findings Findings show continued investments in heteronormative and cisnormative structures concerning information provision and access for TGNC patrons. TGNC patrons using library guides consistently fail to see any mentioned made of their respective identities aside from research about their identities. Patrons seeking information of personal value (i.e. coming out resources) find few resources. Further, library stacks and databases enact consistent microaggressions such as fetishizing, deadnaming and misgendering. Originality/value The deployment of CDA within information science is still a relatively new one. While linguists have long understood the multiplicity of discourse beyond language, the application of this method to the academic library as a discursive institution proves generative. Furthermore, the relationship between academic libraries and their LGBTQ+ populations is both underrepresented and undervalued, a problem exacerbated when focusing on how transgender and gender nonconforming patrons see themselves and their relationships to the academic library. This paper shows the dire state of representation for these particular patrons and provides groundwork for positively changing such representations.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 181
页数:23
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Accardi MariaT., 2010, CRITICAL LIB INSTRUC
  • [2] ACRL Women and Gender Studies Section, 2018, US BLOG POST
  • [3] Adler M., 2017, Cruising the library: Perversities in the organization of knowledge
  • [4] Ahmed S., 2012, On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life
  • [5] American Library Association, 2018, LIB SAF SPAC
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2009, METHODS CRITICAL DIS
  • [7] Bechdel Alison., 2007, Fun Home: A Family Tragicomic
  • [8] Beckett C., 2016, What does the Trump triumph mean for journalism, politics and social media
  • [9] Benjamin H., 1966, TRANSSEXUAL PHENOMEN
  • [10] Critical discourse analysis
    Blommaert, J
    Bulcaen, C
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANTHROPOLOGY, 2000, 29 : 447 - 466