Full dilation cesarean section: a risk factor for recurrent second-trimester loss and preterm birth

被引:47
作者
Watson, Helena A. [1 ]
Carter, Jenny [1 ]
David, Anna L. [2 ]
Seed, Paul T. [1 ]
Shennan, Andrew H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, St Thomas Hosp, Div Womens Hlth, Westminster Bridge Rd London, London SE1 7EH, England
[2] UCL, Inst Womens Hlth, London, England
关键词
Cesarean section; preterm birth; cervix; ultrasound; delivery; CERVICAL DILATATION; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.13160
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
IntroductionA previous cesarean section at full dilation (FDCS) is a risk factor for preterm birth. To provide insight into the risk to subsequent pregnancies, this cohort study compares the outcomes of pregnant women with a previous preterm birth associated with either a prior FDCS or a prior term vaginal delivery. Material and methodsWe identified women attending two inner-city preterm surveillance clinics (Guy's and St Thomas Hospital and University College London Hospital, London, UK) who had a spontaneous late miscarriage (14(+0)-23(+6) weeks) or spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB; <37 weeks' gestation) following a term pregnancy, and then a further pregnancy for analysis. Cases were those with a prior term FDCS, whereas controls had a prior term vaginal birth; both before the late miscarriage/sPTB. Main outcomes were gestational age at delivery and delivery at <30 weeks in the next (third) pregnancy. ResultsOver the study period, 66 women were identified who had a term delivery followed by a late miscarriage or sPTB, and a subsequent pregnancy. Recurrent sPTB <30 weeks was more common in cases than in controls (12/29, vs. 5/37, p = 0.02, Fisher's exact test, RR 3.06, 95% CI 1.22-7.71). Median gestation at delivery was significantly lower [249 days (IQR 154, 267) vs. 280 days (IQR 259, 280) p < 0.001]. Eleven women in the FDCS group received vaginal cerclage, five of whom delivered <37 weeks. ConclusionIn this cohort study we observed that women with a term FDCS and subsequent late miscarriage/sPTB have a higher risk of recurrent sPTB compared with women whose first term delivery was vaginal.
引用
收藏
页码:1100 / 1105
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour [J].
Allen, VM ;
O'Connell, CM ;
Baskett, TF .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (07) :986-990
[2]   The disappearing art of instrumental delivery: Time to reverse the trend [J].
Bailey, PE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 91 (01) :89-96
[3]  
Gardner MJ, 1989, STAT CONFIDENCE, P28
[4]   Does stage of labor at time of cesarean delivery affect risk of subsequent preterm birth? [J].
Levine, Lisa D. ;
Sammel, Mary D. ;
Hirshberg, Adi ;
Elovitz, Michal A. ;
Srinivas, Sindhu K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (03) :360.e1-360.e7
[5]   Caesarean section in the second stage of labour: A retrospective review of obstetric setting and morbidity [J].
McKelvey, A. ;
Ashe, R. ;
McKenna, D. ;
Roberts, R. .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 30 (03) :264-267
[6]   The Preterm Prediction Study: Effect of gestational age and cause of preterm birth on subsequent obstetric outcome [J].
Mercer, BM ;
Goldenberg, RL ;
Moawad, AH ;
Meis, PJ ;
Iams, JD ;
Das, AF ;
Caritis, SN ;
Miodovnik, M ;
Menard, MK ;
Thurnau, GR ;
Dombrowski, MP ;
Roberts, JM ;
McNellis, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (05) :1216-1221
[7]  
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2015, PRET LAB BIRTH NICE, V25
[8]   Rising rates of caesarean deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a concerning trend [J].
Unterscheider, J. ;
McMenamin, M. ;
Cullinane, F. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2011, 157 (02) :141-144
[9]   Caesarean section at full dilatation: incidence, impact and current management [J].
Vousden, Nicola ;
Cargill, Zillah ;
Briley, Annette ;
Tydeman, Graham ;
Shennan, Andrew H. .
OBSTETRICIAN & GYNAECOLOGIST, 2014, 16 (03) :199-205