Measuring the effects of environmental policies on electricity markets risk

被引:6
作者
Inzunza, Andres [1 ,2 ]
Munoz, Francisco D. [3 ,6 ]
Moreno, Rodrigo [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chile, Energy Ctr, Plaza Ercilla 847, Santiago 8370450, Chile
[2] MIT, MIT Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Cambridge, MA 01239 USA
[3] Univ Adolfo Ibanez, Fac Ingn & Ciencias, Santiago, Chile
[4] Univ Chile, Dept Elect Engn, Santiago 8370450, Chile
[5] Imperial Coll London, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, London SW7 2AZ, England
[6] Inst Sistemas Complejos Ingn, Santiago, Chile
关键词
CVaR optimization; Renewable portfolio standard; Carbon tax; Electricity generation planning; Power systems economics; PORTFOLIO THEORY; ENERGY-STORAGE; OPTIMIZATION; INVESTMENT; GENERATION; RENEWABLES; STANDARDS; EMISSIONS; AVERSION; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105470
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper studies how environmental policies, such as renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and carbon taxes, might contribute to reducing risk exposure in the electricity generation sector. We illustrate this effect by first computing long-term market equilibria of the Chilean generation sector for the year 2035 using a risk-averse planning model, considering uncertainty of hydrological scenarios and fossil fuel prices as well as distinct levels of risk aversion, but assuming no environmental policies in place. We then compare these risk-averse equilibria to generation portfolios obtained by imposing several levels of RPS and carbon taxes in a market with risk-neutral firms, separately. Our results show that the implementation of both policies can provide incentives for investments in portfolios of generation technologies that limit the risk exposure of the system, particularly when high levels of RPS (35%) or high carbon taxes (35 $/tonCO2) are applied. However, we find that in the case of a hydrothermal system, the resulting market equilibria under RPS policies yield expected generation cost and risk levels (i.e. standard deviation of costs) that are more similar to the efficient portfolios determined using a risk-averse planning model than the ones we find under the carbon tax.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   The effect of environmental policies on risk reductions in energy generation [J].
Acevedo, Giancarlo ;
Bernales, Alejandro ;
Flores, Andres ;
Inzunza, Andres ;
Moreno, Rodrigo .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2021, 126
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Projected Costs of Generating Electricity
[3]  
AVi-Yonah R. S., 2009, Stan Envtl LJ, V28, P3
[4]  
Awerbuch S., 2006, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V11, P693, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11027-006-4754-4
[5]  
Awerbuch S., 2003, Applying Portfolio Theory to EU Electricity Planning and Policy-Making
[6]   Costs and benefits of renewables portfolio standards in the United States [J].
Barbose, Galen ;
Bird, Lori ;
Heeter, Jenny ;
Flores-Espino, Francisco ;
Wiser, Ryan .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 52 :523-533
[7]   Quantifying the effects of uncertain climate and environmental policies on investments and carbon emissions: A case study of Chile [J].
Bergen, Matias ;
Munoz, Francisco D. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 75 :261-273
[8]   Power sector investment risk and renewable energy: A Japanese case study using portfolio risk optimization method [J].
Bhattacharya, Anindya ;
Kojima, Satoshi .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 40 :69-80
[9]  
Bloomberg New Energy Finance, 2016, NEW ENERGY OUTLOOK 2
[10]   Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the US from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector [J].
Burtraw, D ;
Krupnick, A ;
Palmer, K ;
Paul, A ;
Toman, M ;
Bloyd, C .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 45 (03) :650-673