How Reproducible Is Home-Based 24-Hour Ambulatory Monitoring of Motor Activity in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis?

被引:12
作者
Rietberg, Marc B. [1 ,2 ]
van Wegen, Erwin E. [2 ]
Uitdehaag, Bernard M. [3 ,4 ]
de Vet, Henrica C. [4 ,5 ]
Kwakkel, Gert [2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Rehabil Med, Phys Therapy Sect, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Res Inst MOVE, Dept Rehabil Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Res Inst MOVE, Dept Neurol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Res Inst MOVE, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] EMGO Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2010年 / 91卷 / 10期
关键词
Ambulatory monitoring; Motor activity; Multiple sclerosis; Rehabilitation; Reproducibility of results; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; SELF-REPORT; RELIABILITY; ACCELEROMETRY; REHABILITATION; ILLUSTRATION; VALIDATION; AGREEMENT; ACCURACY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.018
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Rietberg. MB, van Wegen EE, Uitdehaag BM, de Vet HC, Kwakkel G. How reproducible is home-based 24-hour ambulatory monitoring of motor activity in patients with multiple sclerosis? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:1537-41. Objective: To determine the reproducibility of 24-hour monitoring of motor activity in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Design: Test-retest design; 6 research assistants visited the participants twice within 1 week in the home situation. Setting: General community. Participants: A convenience sample of ambulatory patients (N=43; mean age +/- SD, 48.7 +/- 7.0y; 30 women; median Expanded Disability Status Scale scores, 3.5; interquartile range, 2.5) were recruited from the outpatient clinic of a university medical center. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Dynamic activity and static activity parameters were recorded by using a portable data logger and classified continuously for 24 hours. Reproducibility was determined by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for test-retest reliability and by applying the Bland-Altman method for agreement between the 2 measurements. The smallest detectable change (SDC) was calculated based on the standard error of measurement. Results: Test-retest reliability expressed by the was.72 for dynamic activity,.74 for transitions,.77 for walking,.71 for static activity..67 for sitting,.62 for standing, and.55 for lying. Bland and Altman analysis indicated no systematic differences between the first and second assessment for dynamic and static activity. Measurement error expressed by the SDC was 1.23 for dynamic activity, 66 for transitions,.99 for walking. 1.52 for static activity, 4.68 for lying, 3.95 for sitting, and 3.34 for standing.. Conclusions: The current study shows that with 24-hour monitoring, a reproducible estimate of physical activity can be obtained in ambulatory patients with MS.
引用
收藏
页码:1537 / 1541
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [2] Quantified measurement of activity provides insight into motor function and recovery in neurological disease
    Busse, ME
    Pearson, OR
    Van Deursen, R
    Wiles, CM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 75 (06) : 884 - 888
  • [3] Validity and reliability of measurements obtained with an "activity monitor" in people with and without a transtibial amputation
    Bussmann, HBJ
    Reuvekamp, PJ
    Veltink, PH
    Martens, WLJ
    Stam, HJ
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1998, 78 (09): : 989 - 998
  • [4] Ambulatory accelerometry to quantify motor behaviour in patients after failed back surgery: a validation study
    Bussmann, JBJ
    van de Laar, YM
    Neeleman, MP
    Stam, HJ
    [J]. PAIN, 1998, 74 (2-3) : 153 - 161
  • [5] Measuring daily behavior using ambulatory accelerometry: The activity monitor
    Bussmann, JBJ
    Martens, WLJ
    Tulen, JHM
    Schasfoort, FC
    van den Berg-Emons, HJG
    Stam, HJ
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 2001, 33 (03): : 349 - 356
  • [6] Techniques for measurement and assessment of mobility in rehabilitation: a theoretical approach
    Bussmann, JBJ
    Stam, HJ
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 1998, 12 (06) : 455 - 464
  • [7] When to use agreement versus reliability measures
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Knol, Dirk L.
    Bouter, Lex M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (10) : 1033 - 1039
  • [8] GHIONE S, 1993, J HYPERTENS, V11, pS284
  • [9] Physical activity and multiple sclerosis - Validity of self-report and objective measures
    Gosney, Jessica L.
    Scott, Jennifer A.
    Snook, Etin M.
    Motl, Robetl W.
    [J]. FAMILY & COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2007, 30 (02) : 144 - 150
  • [10] Accuracy of objective ambulatory accelerometry in detecting motor complications in patients with Parkinson disease
    Hoff, JI
    van der Meer, V
    van Hilten, JJ
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 27 (02) : 53 - 57