Climate Endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios

被引:309
作者
Kemp, Luke [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Chi [3 ]
Depledge, Joanna [4 ]
Ebi, Kristie L. [5 ]
Gibbins, Goodwin [6 ]
Kohler, Timothy A. [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Rockstrom, Johan [10 ]
Scheffer, Marten [11 ]
Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim [10 ,12 ]
Steffen, Will [13 ]
Lenton, Timothy M. [14 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Ctr Study Existential Risk, Cambridge CB2 1SB, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Darwin Coll, Cambridge CB2 1SB, England
[3] Nanjing Univ, Sch Life Sci, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Ctr Environm Energy & Nat Resource Gove, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, England
[5] Univ Washington, Ctr Hlth & Global Environm, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Univ Oxford, Future Humanity Inst, Oxford OX2 0DJ, England
[7] Washington State Univ, Dept Anthropol, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[8] Santa Fe Inst, Santa Fe, NM 87501 USA
[9] Univ Kiel, Cluster Excellence ROOTS Social Environm & Cultur, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[10] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[11] Univ Wageningen, Dept Environm Sci, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
[12] Tsinghua Univ, Earth Syst Sci Dept, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[13] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[14] Univ Exeter, Global Syst Inst, Exeter EX4 4QE, Devon, England
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
catastrophic climate change; climate change; Earth system trajectories; Anthropocene; tipping elements; TIPPING POINTS; RISK; FUTURE; UNCERTAINTY; CO2;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.2108146119
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Prudent risk management requires consideration of bad-to-worst-case scenarios. Yet, for climate change, such potential futures are poorly understood. Could anthropogenic climate change result in worldwide societal collapse or even eventual human extinction? At present, this is a dangerously underexplored topic. Yet there are ample reasons to suspect that climate change could result in a global catastrophe. Analyzing the mechanisms for these extreme consequences could help galvanize action, improve resilience, and inform policy, including emergency responses. We outline current knowledge about the likelihood of extreme climate change, discuss why understanding bad-toworst cases is vital, articulate reasons for concern about catastrophic outcomes, define key terms, and put forward a research agenda. The proposed agenda covers four main questions: 1) What is the potential for climate change to drive mass extinction events? 2) What are the mechanisms that could result in human mass mortality and morbidity? 3) What are human societies' vulnerabilities to climate-triggered risk cascades, such as from conflict, political instability, and systemic financial risk? 4) How can these multiple strands of evidence-together with other global dangers-be usefully synthesized into an "integrated catastrophe assessment"? It is time for the scientific community to grapple with the challenge of better understanding catastrophic climate change.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 98 条
  • [21] Health risks of warming of 1.5°C, 2°C, and higher, above pre-industrial temperatures
    Ebi, Kristie L.
    Hasegawa, Tomoko
    Hayes, Katie
    Monaghan, Andrew
    Paz, Shlomit
    Berry, Peter
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [22] Field C., 2021, REFLECTING SUNLIGHT
  • [23] Fund for Peace, 2021, FUND PEAC
  • [24] The hysteresis of the Antarctic Ice Sheet
    Garbe, Julius
    Albrecht, Torsten
    Levermann, Anders
    Donges, Jonathan F.
    Winkelmann, Ricarda
    [J]. NATURE, 2020, 585 (7826) : 538 - +
  • [25] Changing risks of simultaneous global breadbasket failure
    Gaupp, Franziska
    Hall, Jim
    Hochrainer-Stigler, Stefan
    Dadson, Simon
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2020, 10 (01) : 54 - +
  • [26] Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study
    Gelfand, Michele J.
    Raver, Jana L.
    Nishii, Lisa
    Leslie, Lisa M.
    Lun, Janetta
    Lim, Beng Chong
    Duan, Lili
    Almaliach, Assaf
    Ang, Soon
    Arnadottir, Jakobina
    Aycan, Zeynep
    Boehnke, Klaus
    Boski, Pawel
    Cabecinhas, Rosa
    Chan, Darius
    Chhokar, Jagdeep
    D'Amato, Alessia
    Ferrer, Montse
    Fischlmayr, Iris C.
    Fischer, Ronald
    Fueloep, Marta
    Georgas, James
    Kashima, Emiko S.
    Kashima, Yoshishima
    Kim, Kibum
    Lempereur, Alain
    Marquez, Patricia
    Othman, Rozhan
    Overlaet, Bert
    Panagiotopoulou, Penny
    Peltzer, Karl
    Perez-Florizno, Lorena R.
    Ponomarenko, Larisa
    Realo, Anu
    Schei, Vidar
    Schmitt, Manfred
    Smith, Peter B.
    Soomro, Nazar
    Szabo, Erna
    Taveesin, Nalinee
    Toyama, Midori
    Van de Vliert, Evert
    Vohra, Naharika
    Ward, Colleen
    Yamaguchi, Susumu
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2011, 332 (6033) : 1100 - 1104
  • [27] Ecosystem perspectives are needed to manage zoonotic risks in a changing climate
    Gibb, Rory
    Franklinos, Lydia H. V.
    Redding, David W.
    Jones, Kate E.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 371
  • [28] Hansson S.O., 2016, ARGUMENTATIVE TURN P
  • [29] Emissions - the 'business as usual' story is misleading
    Hausfather, Zeke
    Peters, Glen P.
    [J]. NATURE, 2020, 577 (7792) : 618 - 620
  • [30] Synchronous failure: the emerging causal architecture of global crisis
    Homer-Dixon, Thomas
    Walker, Brian
    Biggs, Reinette
    Crepin, Anne-Sophie
    Folke, Carl
    Lambin, Eric F.
    Peterson, Garry D.
    Rockstom, Johan
    Scheffer, Marten
    Steffen, Will
    Troell, Max
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (03):