Assessing communicative rationality as a transportation planning paradigm

被引:99
作者
Willson, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Polytech Univ Pomona, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Pomona, CA 91768 USA
关键词
communicative action; discourse; participation; planning theory; rationality; transport policy;
D O I
10.1023/A:1005247430522
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Communicative rationality offers a new paradigm for transportation planning. Drawing on the literature and lessons from transportation planning practice, this paper describes the characteristics of a "communicative" form of transportation planning and compares them with conventional practices. A communicative rationality paradigm would place language and discourse at the core of transportation planning. The paper argues that it would lead to greater attention to desired transportation ends (goals), better integration of means and ends, new forms of participation and learning, and enhanced deliberative capacity. The paper explains the implications of this paradigm for the role of the transportation planner, the purpose of planning, the planning process, communicative practices, problem framing, and the nature of planning analysis. The paper concludes with an assessment of communicative rationality's ability to promote more effective transportation planning. It seeks to create a dialogue that will support the investigation of new transportation planning processes.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 31
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Rational Versus Communicative: Towards an Understanding of Spatial Planning Methods in German Planning Practice [J].
Diller, Christian ;
Hoffmann, Anna ;
Oberding, Sarah .
PLANNING PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2018, 33 (03) :244-263
[22]   Just deliberation: Can communicative rationality support socially just environmental conservation in rural Africa? [J].
Martin, Adrian ;
Rutagarama, Eugene .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2012, 28 (03) :189-198
[23]   Environmental assessment and planning theory: four short stories about power, multiple rationality, and ethics [J].
Richardson, T .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2005, 25 (04) :341-365
[24]   Assessing Communicative Quality of Life and Participation in Dementia: a Scoping Review [J].
Gruening, Antje ;
Oslmeier, Charlotte ;
Tuerck, Julia ;
Buettner-Kunert, Julia .
SPRACHE-STIMME-GEHOR, 2022, 46 (04) :E1-E8
[25]   Planning and management in health: historical and tendencies based on a communicative view [J].
Uribe Rivera, Francisco Javier ;
Artmann, Elizabeth .
CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2010, 15 (05) :2265-2274
[26]   Habermas revisited: Resurrecting the contested roots of communicative planning theory [J].
Mattila, Hanna .
PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 2020, 141
[27]   Rationality and Power in Land Use Planning: A Conceptual View of the Relationship [J].
Adjei-Poku, Bernard .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2018, 33 (01) :45-60
[28]   Study on the rationality of tourist-dedicated train line planning [J].
Cui Y. ;
Ma C. ;
Zhao Y. ;
Chen H. .
Advances in Transportation Studies, 2023, 59 :207-220
[29]   Institutional Barriers in the Coproduction of Knowledge for Transportation Planning [J].
Nostikasari, Dian ;
Casey, Colleen .
PLANNING THEORY & PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (05) :671-691
[30]   ANALYSIS INTO THE SPECIFICS OF MEDIA WARS ON SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE CONTEXT OF COMMUNICATIVE PARADIGM OF MODERN SCIENCE [J].
Mogilevskaya, Galina, I ;
Rodionova, Valentina, I ;
Shvachkina, Lyudmila A. ;
Kotlyarova, Victoria V. ;
Rudenko, Andrey M. .
AD ALTA-JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH, 2021, 11 (02) :62-66