Effect of Clinical Decision-Support Systems A Systematic Review

被引:769
作者
Bright, Tiffani J.
Wong, Anthony
Dhurjati, Ravi
Bristow, Erin
Bastian, Lori
Coeytaux, Remy R.
Samsa, Gregory
Hasselblad, Vic
Williams, John W.
Musty, Michael D.
Wing, Liz
Kendrick, Amy S.
Sanders, Gillian D.
Lobach, David
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Duke Evidence Based Practice Ctr, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL-RECORD; PHYSICIAN ORDER ENTRY; PROMOTING SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; HEALTH INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; LABORATORY MONITORING ALERTS; PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIANS; INNER-CITY SETTINGS; QUALITY-OF-CARE; COMPUTERIZED REMINDERS;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00450
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Despite increasing emphasis on the role of clinical decision-support systems (CDSSs) for improving care and reducing costs, evidence to support widespread use is lacking. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of CDSSs on clinical outcomes, health care processes, workload and efficiency, patient satisfaction, cost, and provider use and implementation. Data Sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science through January 2011. Study Selection: Investigators independently screened reports to identify randomized trials published in English of electronic CDSSs that were implemented in clinical settings; used by providers to aid decision making at the point of care; and reported clinical, health care process, workload, relationship-centered, economic, or provider use outcomes. Data Extraction: Investigators extracted data about study design, participant characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and quality. Data Synthesis: 148 randomized, controlled trials were included. A total of 128 (86%) assessed health care process measures, 29 (20%) assessed clinical outcomes, and 22 (15%) measured costs. Both commercially and locally developed CDSSs improved health care process measures related to performing preventive services (n = 25; odds ratio [OR], 1.42 [95% CI, 1.27 to 1.58]), ordering clinical studies (n = 20; OR, 1.72 [CI, 1.47 to 2.00]), and prescribing therapies (n = 46; OR, 1.57 [CI, 1.35 to 1.82]). Few studies measured potential unintended consequences or adverse effects. Limitations: Studies were heterogeneous in interventions, populations, settings, and outcomes. Publication bias and selective reporting cannot be excluded. Conclusion: Both commercially and locally developed CDSSs are effective at improving health care process measures across diverse settings, but evidence for clinical, economic, workload, and efficiency outcomes remains sparse. This review expands knowledge in the field by demonstrating the benefits of CDSSs outside of experienced academic centers.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / U77
页数:20
相关论文
共 174 条
  • [1] Physicians answer more clinical questions and change clinical decisions more often with synthesized evidence: A randomized trial in primary care
    Alper, BS
    White, DS
    Ge, B
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2005, 3 (06) : 507 - 513
  • [2] [Anonymous], METH GUID EFF COMP E
  • [3] Improving guideline adherence -: A randomized trial evaluating strategies to increase β-blocker use in heart failure
    Ansari, M
    Shlipak, MG
    Heidenreich, PA
    Van Ostaeyen, D
    Pohl, EC
    Browner, WS
    Massie, BM
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2003, 107 (22) : 2799 - 2804
  • [4] A randomized outpatient trial of a decision-support information technology tool
    Apkon, M
    Mattera, JA
    Lin, ZQ
    Herrin, J
    Bradley, EH
    Carbone, M
    Holmboe, ES
    Gross, CP
    Selter, JG
    Rich, A
    Krumholz, HM
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 165 (20) : 2388 - 2394
  • [5] Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
    Atkins, David
    Chang, Stephanie M.
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    Buckley, David I.
    Whitlock, Evelyn P.
    Berliner, Elise
    Matchar, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (11) : 1198 - 1207
  • [6] A randomized trial of a computer-based intervention to reduce utilization of redundant laboratory tests
    Bates, DW
    Kuperman, GJ
    Rittenberg, E
    Teich, JM
    Fiskio, J
    Ma'luf, N
    Onderdonk, A
    Wybenga, D
    Winkelman, J
    Brennan, TA
    Komaroff, AL
    Tanasijevic, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 106 (02) : 144 - 150
  • [7] Electronic Health Record-Based Decision Support to Improve Asthma Care: A Cluster-Randomized Trial
    Bell, Louis M.
    Grundmeier, Robert
    Localio, Russell
    Zorc, Joseph
    Fiks, Alexander G.
    Zhang, Xuemei
    Stephens, Bryant
    Swietlik, Marguerite
    Guevara, James P.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2010, 125 (04) : E770 - E777
  • [8] Impact of a Multifaceted Intervention on Cholesterol Management in Primary Care Practices Guideline Adherence for Heart Health Randomized Trial
    Bertoni, Alain G.
    Bonds, Denise E.
    Chen, Haiying
    Hogan, Patricia
    Crago, Lenore
    Rosenberger, Erica
    Barham, Ann Hiott
    Clinch, C. Randall
    Goff, David C., Jr.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 169 (07) : 678 - 686
  • [9] 3 STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE CANCER SCREENING - HOW FEASIBLE IS WIDE-SCALE IMPLEMENTATION
    BIRD, JA
    MCPHEE, SJ
    JENKINS, C
    FORDHAM, D
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1990, 28 (11) : 1005 - 1012
  • [10] Patient education and provider decision support to control blood pressure in primary care: A cluster randomized trial
    Bosworth, Hayden B.
    Olsen, Maren K.
    Dudley, Tara
    Orr, Melinda
    Goldstein, Mary K.
    Datta, Santanu K.
    McCant, Felicia
    Gentry, Pam
    Simel, David L.
    Oddone, Eugene Z.
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 157 (03) : 450 - 456