An accurate skull stripping method based on simplex meshes and histogram analysis for magnetic resonance images

被引:52
作者
Galdames, Francisco J. [1 ,4 ]
Jaillet, Fabrice [3 ,4 ]
Perez, Claudio A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chile, Biomed Engn Lab, Dept Elect Engn, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ Chile, Adv Min Technol Ctr, Santiago, Chile
[3] Univ Lyon, IUT Lyon 1, Dept Comp Sci, F-01000 Lyon, France
[4] Univ Lyon 1, CNRS, LIRIS, SAARA Team, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
关键词
Accurate skull stripping; Non-brain tissue removal; Brain surface extraction; Brain surface simplex mesh modeling; Patient specific mesh; T1W MRI; FULLY-AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION; BRAIN EXTRACTION; MR-IMAGES; TISSUE CLASSIFICATION; LEVEL SET; ALGORITHM; HEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.02.017
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Skull stripping methods are designed to eliminate the non-brain tissue in magnetic resonance (MR) brain images. Removal of non-brain tissues is a fundamental step in enabling the processing of brain MR images. The aim of this study is to develop an automatic accurate skull stripping method based on deformable models and histogram analysis. A rough-segmentation step is used to find the optimal starting point for the deformation and is based on thresholds and morphological operators. Thresholds are computed using comparisons with an atlas, and modeling by Gaussians. The deformable model is based on a simplex mesh and its deformation is controlled by the image local gray levels and the information obtained on the gray level modeling of the rough-segmentation. Our Simplex Mesh and Histogram Analysis Skull Stripping (SMHASS) method was tested on the following international databases commonly used in scientific articles: BrainWeb, Internet Brain Segmentation Repository (IBSR), and Segmentation Validation Engine (SVE). A comparison was performed against three of the best skull stripping methods previously published: Brain Extraction Tool (BET), Brain Surface Extractor (BSE), and Hybrid Watershed Algorithm (HWA). Performance was measured using the Jaccard index U) and Dice coefficient (kappa). Our method showed the best performance and differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05): J = 0.904 and kappa = 0.950 on BrainWeb; J = 0.905 and kappa = 0.950 on IBSR: J = 0.946 and kappa = 0.972 on SVE. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 119
页数:17
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, ACM siggraph computer graphics, DOI [10.1145/37401.37422, DOI 10.1145/37401.37422]
[2]  
[Anonymous], BRAINSUITE
[3]   Voxel-based morphometry - The methods [J].
Ashburner, J ;
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 11 (06) :805-821
[4]   Fully automatic segmentation of the brain in MRI [J].
Atkins, MS ;
Mackiewich, BT .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1998, 17 (01) :98-107
[5]   A new improved version of the realistic digital brain phantom [J].
Aubert-Broche, Berengere ;
Evans, Alan C. ;
Collins, Louis .
NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 32 (01) :138-145
[6]   Segmentation of brain 3D MR images using level sets and dense registration [J].
Baillard, C ;
Hellier, P ;
Barillot, C .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2001, 5 (03) :185-194
[7]   Quantitative comparison of four brain extraction algorithms [J].
Boesen, K ;
Rehm, K ;
Schaper, K ;
Stoltzner, S ;
Woods, R ;
Lüders, E ;
Rottenberg, D .
NEUROIMAGE, 2004, 22 (03) :1255-1261
[8]   Application of a new segmentation tool based on interactive simplex meshes to cardiac images and pulmonary MRI data [J].
Boettger, Thomas ;
Kunert, Tobias ;
Meinzer, Hans P. ;
Wolf, Ivo .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (03) :319-329
[9]   Simple paradigm for extra-cerebral tissue removal: Algorithm and analysis [J].
Carass, Aaron ;
Cuzzocreo, Jennifer ;
Wheeler, M. Bryan ;
Bazin, Pierre-Louis ;
Resnick, Susan M. ;
Prince, Jerry L. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 56 (04) :1982-1992
[10]  
Center for Morphometric Analysis, 1995, MASS GEN HOSP INT BR