Residential Energy Sustainability in China and Germany: The Impact of National Energy Policy System

被引:17
|
作者
Sheng, Chunhong [1 ]
Cao, Yun [2 ]
Xue, Bing [3 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, China Ctr Special Econ Zone Res, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Governance, D-80333 Munich, Germany
[3] Inst Adv Sustainabil Studies eV IASS, D-14467 Potsdam, Germany
关键词
residential energy; energy policy; China; Germany; public participation; ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION; HOUSEHOLD ELECTRICITY; WILLINGNESS; SECTOR; REFORM; MIXES;
D O I
10.3390/su10124535
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The energy consumption and carbon emission of Chinese households is growing rapidly and will continue to do so for the near future. Currently, Chinese energy policies mainly focus on the industrial sector instead of the residential sector. Among industrialized countries, Germany has performed relatively well in the residential sector, which can provide valuable lessons for China. This paper investigates the policy-making, implementation, and resulting patterns of Chinese and German residential energy policies from a multi-level perspective. The policy system study provides a holistic view over the factors influencing residential energy sustainability. The main findings are: (1) the German residential energy policy system follows a hybrid policy model, combining top-down and bottom-up policy designs, with more demand-side or market-oriented policies, and a high level of public participation, resulting in remarkable headway toward sustainability in the residential energy sector; and (2) the Chinese energy policy system is characterized by top-down, supply-side oriented market policies with limited public participation. The policy implication of this study for China is to shift its top-down policy paradigm to a hybrid policy model that facilitates public participation in the residential energy sector.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A statistical method to investigate national energy consumption in the residential building sector of China
    Chen, Shuqin
    Li, Nianping
    Guan, Jun
    Xie, Yanqun
    Sun, Fengmei
    Ni, Ji
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2008, 40 (04) : 654 - 665
  • [22] Construct and Perfect the System of China's Energy Policy
    Li Jinkai
    Yang Li
    Ji Xi
    ADVANCES IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2011, 40-41 : 322 - +
  • [23] Residential energy consumption in urban China: A decomposition analysis
    Zhao, Xiaoli
    Li, Na
    Ma, Chunbo
    ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 41 : 644 - 653
  • [24] Energy transition in Germany: a case study on a policy-driven structural change of the energy system
    Felix Christian Matthes
    Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 2017, 14 (1) : 141 - 169
  • [25] The 'climate dialectic' in energy policy: Germany and India compared
    Goodman, James
    ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 99 : 184 - 193
  • [26] Germany's Struggle for Energy Efficiency Policy Instruments after the National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency (NAPE)
    Weyland, Matthias
    Steuwer, Sibyl D.
    GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2018, 27 (02): : 216 - 221
  • [27] Review of the Impact of Tax Policy on Renewable Energy Development in China
    Shen, Jianfei
    Wang, Yuan
    Yan, Suli
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ENERGY SCIENCE AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING (ISESCE 2015), 2016, 45 : 292 - 295
  • [28] Plus energy - a new energy performance standard in Germany for both residential and non-residential buildings
    Erhorn-Kluttig, Heike
    Erhorn, Hans
    Reiss, Johann
    ADVANCES IN BUILDING ENERGY RESEARCH, 2015, 9 (01) : 73 - 88
  • [29] The impact of policy actions and future energy prices on the cost-optimal development of the energy system in Norway and Sweden
    Seljom, Pernille
    Tomasgard, Asgeir
    ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 106 : 85 - 102
  • [30] Opportunities and challenges for renewable energy policy in China
    Zhang Peidong
    Yang Yanli
    Shi Jin
    Zheng Yonghong
    Wang Lisheng
    Li Xinrong
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (02): : 439 - 449