Experimental determination of UO2(cr) dissolution kinetics:: Effects of solution saturation state and pH

被引:67
作者
Pierce, EM
Icenhower, JP
Serne, RJ
Catalano, JG
机构
[1] Pacific NW Natl Lab, Environm Technol Div, Appl Geol & Geochem Grp, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.05.012
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
To evaluate the release of uranium from natural ore deposits, spent nuclear fuel repositories, and REDOX permeable reactive barriers (PRB), knowledge of the fundamental reaction kinetics associated with the dissolution of uranium dioxide is necessary. Dissolution of crystalline uranium (IV) dioxide under environmental conditions has been studied for four decades but a cardinal gap in the published literature is the effect of pH and solution saturation state on UO2(cr) dissolution. To resolve inconsistencies, UO2 dissolution experiments have been conducted under oxic conditions using the single-pass flow-through system. Experiments were conducted as it function of total dissolved carbonate ([CO3-3](T)) from 0.001 to 0.1 M: pH from 7.5 to 11.1: ratio of flow-through rate (q) to specific surface area (S), constant ionic strength (I) = 0. 1 M, and temperatures (T) from 23 to 60 degrees C utilizing both powder and monolithic specimens. The results show that UO2 dissolution varies as a function of the ratio q/S and temperature. At values of log(10)q/S > -7,0, UO2 dissolution becomes invariant with respect to q/S, which can be interpreted its evidence for dissolution at the forward rate of reaction. The data collected in these experiments show the rate of UO2 dissolution increased by an order of magnitude with a 30 degrees C increase in temperature. The results also show the overall dissolution rate increases with an increase in pH and decreases as the dissolved uranium concentration approaches saturation with respect to secondary reaction products. Thus, as the value of the reaction quotient, Q, approaches equilibrium K, (with respect to a potential secondary phase) the dissolution rate decreases. This decrease in dissolution rate (r) was also observed when comparing measured UO2 dissolution rates from static tests where r = 1.7 +/- 0.14 x 10 (8) mol m (2)s (1) to the rate for flow-through reactors where r = 3.1 +/- 1.2 x 10(-7) mol m (-2) s(-1) . Thus, using traditional static test methods can result in an underestimation of the true forward rate of UO2(cr) dissolution. These results illustrate the importance of pH solution saturation state, and the concentration of dissolved carbonate on the release of uranium from UO2 in the natural environment. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 218
页数:13
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Remediation of U(VI)-contaminated water using zero-valent iron [J].
Abdelouas, A ;
Lutze, W ;
Nuttall, E ;
Gong, WL .
COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE DES SCIENCES SERIE II FASCICULE A-SCIENCES DE LA TERRE ET DES PLANETES, 1999, 328 (05) :315-319
[2]   Reduction of U(VI) to U(IV) by indigenous bacteria in contaminated ground water [J].
Abdelouas, A ;
Lu, YM ;
Lutze, W ;
Nuttall, HE .
JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 1998, 35 (1-3) :217-233
[3]   AQUEOUS CHEMISTRY OF URANIUM MINERALS .2. MINERALS OF THE LIEBIGITE GROUP [J].
ALWAN, AK ;
WILLIAMS, PA .
MINERALOGICAL MAGAZINE, 1980, 43 (329) :665-667
[4]   Relativistic calculations of spin-dependent x-ray-absorption spectra [J].
Ankudinov, AL ;
Rehr, JJ .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1997, 56 (04) :R1712-R1715
[5]  
ASTM, 2001, C136 ASTM
[6]  
BARGAR JR, 2002, P EUR NEA WORKSH SPE, P57
[7]   IN-SITU CHEMICAL SPECIATION OF URANIUM IN SOILS AND SEDIMENTS BY MICRO-X-RAY ABSORPTION-SPECTROSCOPY [J].
BERTSCH, PM ;
HUNTER, DB ;
SUTTON, SR ;
BAJT, S ;
RIVERS, ML .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 28 (05) :980-984
[8]  
BROWN GE, 1988, REV MINERAL, V18, P431
[9]   THE KINETICS OF DISSOLUTION OF UO2 UNDER REDUCING CONDITIONS AND THE INFLUENCE OF AN OXIDIZED SURFACE-LAYER (UO2+X) - APPLICATION OF A CONTINUOUS FLOW-THROUGH REACTOR [J].
BRUNO, J ;
CASAS, I ;
PUIGDOMENECH, I .
GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1991, 55 (03) :647-658
[10]  
BRUNO J, 1988, RADIOCHIM ACTA, V44-5, P11