Assisted reproductive technology: public funding and the voluntary shift to single embryo transfer in Australia

被引:39
作者
Chambers, Georgina M. [1 ]
Illingworth, Peter J. [2 ,3 ]
Sullivan, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Perinatal & Reprod Epidemiol Res Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Westmead Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] IVFAustralia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT; MULTIPLE BIRTHS; INSURANCE-COVERAGE; COSTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.5694/mja10.11448
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To calculate cost savings to the Australian federal and state governments from the reduction in twin and triplet birth rates for infants conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART) since 2002, and to determine the number of ART treatment programs theoretically funded by means of these savings. Design and setting: Costing model using data from the Australia and New Zealand Assisted Reproduction Database, the National Perinatal Data Collection and Medicare Australia on ART treatment cycles undertaken in Australia between 2002 and 2008. Main outcome measures: Annual savings in maternal and infant inpatient birth-admission costs resulting from the reduction in ART multiple birth rate; theoretical number of ART treatment programs funded and infants born by means of these savings. Results: The reduction in the ART multiple birth rate from 18.8% in 2002 to 8.6% in 2008 resulted in estimated savings to government of $47.6 million in birth-admission costs alone. Theoretically, these savings funded 7042 ART treatment programs comprising one fresh plus one frozen embryo transfer cycle, equating to the birth of 2841 babies. Fifty-five per cent of the increased use of ART services since 2002 has been theoretically funded by the reduction in multiple birth infants. Conclusions: Against a backdrop of supportive public funding of ART in Australia, a voluntary shift to single embryo transfer by fertility clinicians and ART patients has resulted in substantial savings in hospital costs. Much of the growth in ART use has been theoretically cross-subsidised by the move to safer embryo transfer practices.
引用
收藏
页码:594 / 598
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COD PRACT ASS REPR T
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, FUND SOURC ADM PAT A
[3]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, CONS PRIC IND AUSTR
[4]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[5]  
American Society for Reproductive Medicine
[6]  
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2009, 2007 ASS REPR TECHN
[7]   Babies born after ART treatment cost more than non-ART babies: a cost analysis of inpatient birth-admission costs of singleton and multiple gestation pregnancies [J].
Chambers, Georgina M. ;
Chaptnan, Michael G. ;
Grayson, Narelle ;
Shanahan, Marian ;
Sullivan, Elizabeth A. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 (12) :3108-3115
[8]   The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries [J].
Chambers, Georgina M. ;
Sullivan, Elizabeth A. ;
Ishihara, Osamu ;
Chapman, Michael G. ;
Adamson, G. David .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (06) :2281-2294
[9]   Assisted reproductive technology treatment costs of a live birth: an age-stratified cost-outcome study of treatment in Australia [J].
Chambers, GM ;
Ho, MT ;
Sullivan, EA .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2006, 184 (04) :155-158
[10]  
Crosignani PG, 2000, HUM REPROD, V15, P1856