Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: Trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution

被引:211
|
作者
Kuhl, CK [1 ]
Schild, HH [1 ]
Morakkabati, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Dept Radiol, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2363040811
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate prospectively the trade-off between temporal and spatial resolution in dynamic contrast material-enhanced bilateral magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent and institutional review board approval were obtained. An intraindividual comparative study was performed in 30 patients (mean age, 53 years; age range, 27-70 years) with a total of 54 enhancing lesions (28 benign and 26 malignant) who underwent dynamic MR imaging of the breast twice, once with a standard dynamic protocol (256 X 256 matrix, 69 seconds per acquisition) and once on a separate day with a modified dynamic protocol (400 X 512 matrix, 116 seconds per acquisition). Systematic qualitative analysis of morphologic features and region-of-interest-based analysis of enhancement kinetics were performed. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference (generalized linear modeling) in enhancement rates of benign versus malignant lesions was lost when moving from the standard to the modified dynamic protocol. Kinetic information on signal intensity time course patterns was preserved. Delineation of lesion margins and internal architecture was clearly superior with the modified dynamic protocol, which allowed identification of lesion features associated with high positive predictive value or high negative predictive value for breast cancer. Ten benign lesions classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3 with the standard protocol were correctly downgraded to BI-RADS category 2 with the modified protocol owing to visualization of internal septations. Thirteen malignant lesions categorized as BI-RADS category 3 or 4 with the standard protocol were correctly upgraded to BI-RADS category 4 or 5 with the modified protocol owing to visualization of spicules or rim enhancement. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a significantly larger area under the curve for results obtained with the modified dynamic protocol. CONCLUSION: Increased spatial resolution significantly improves diagnostic confidence and accuracy at dynamic MR imaging, even if this improvement occurs at the expense of temporal resolution. Loss of kinetic information regarding enhancement rates proved to be not diagnostically relevant because enhancement rates showed broad overlap between benign and malignant lesions and were therefore of only limited diagnostic use in the individual patient. Kinetic information regarding time course pattern was preserved and confirmed as having high specificity and high positive predictive value. (c) RSNA, 2005
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 800
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging
    Moon, Marianne
    Cornfeld, Daniel
    Weinreb, Jeffrey
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 17 (02) : 351 - +
  • [2] Clinical application of bilateral high temporal and spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast at 7 T
    Pinker, K.
    Bogner, W.
    Baltzer, P.
    Trattnig, S.
    Gruber, S.
    Abeyakoon, O.
    Bernathova, M.
    Zaric, O.
    Dubsky, P.
    Bago-Horvath, Z.
    Weber, M.
    Leithner, D.
    Helbich, T. H.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (04) : 913 - 920
  • [3] Clinical application of bilateral high temporal and spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast at 7 T
    K. Pinker
    W. Bogner
    P. Baltzer
    S. Trattnig
    S. Gruber
    O. Abeyakoon
    M. Bernathova
    O. Zaric
    P. Dubsky
    Z. Bago-Horvath
    M. Weber
    D. Leithner
    T. H. Helbich
    European Radiology, 2014, 24 : 913 - 920
  • [4] The kinetic analysis of breast cancer: An investigation of the optimal temporal resolution for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging
    Matsukuma, Miwa
    Furukawa, Matakazu
    Yamamoto, Shigeru
    Nakamura, Keiko
    Tanabe, Masahiro
    Okada, Munemasa
    Iida, Etsushi
    Ito, Katsuyoshi
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2020, 61 : 4 - 10
  • [5] Compressed Sensing for Breast MRI: Resolving the Trade-Off Between Spatial and Temporal Resolution
    Vreemann, Suzan
    Rodriguez-Ruiz, Alejandro
    Nickel, Dominik
    Heacock, Laura
    Appelman, Linda
    van Zelst, Jan
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    Weiland, Elisabeth
    Maas, Marnix
    Moy, Linda
    Kiefer, Berthold
    Mann, Ritse M.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2017, 52 (10) : 574 - 582
  • [6] High-Spatial- and High-Temporal-Resolution Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Breast Imaging with Sweep Imaging with Fourier Transformation: A Pilot Study
    Corum, Curtis A.
    Benson, John C.
    Idiyatullin, Djaudat
    Snyder, Angela L.
    Snyder, Carl J.
    Hutter, Diane
    Everson, Lenore I.
    Eberly, Lynn E.
    Nelson, Michael T.
    Garwood, Michael
    RADIOLOGY, 2015, 274 (02) : 540 - 547
  • [7] Clinical testing of high-spatial-resolution parametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast
    Kelcz, F
    Furman-Haran, E
    Grobgeld, D
    Degani, H
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (06) : 1485 - 1492
  • [8] Comparing Concordance Between Contrast-Enhanced Cone Beam Breast CT and Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging of the Breast
    Seifert, P.
    Destounis, S.
    Somerville, P.
    Murphy, P.
    Logan-Young, W.
    Arieno, A.
    Morgan, R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (05)
  • [9] Breast cancer in dense breast: Detection with contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging
    Kawashima, H
    Matsui, O
    Suzuki, M
    Kadoya, M
    Tawara, M
    Nonomura, A
    Noguchi, M
    Takashima, T
    JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2000, 11 (03): : 233 - 243
  • [10] Anatomical landmark localization in breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging
    Yin, X. X.
    Ng, B. W. -H.
    Yang, Q.
    Pitman, A.
    Ramamohanarao, K.
    Abbott, D.
    MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2012, 50 (01) : 91 - 101