Comparative study on life cycle assessment of components produced by additive and conventional manufacturing process

被引:8
作者
Swetha, R. [1 ]
Krishna, L. Siva Rama [1 ]
Kiran, B. Hari Sai [1 ]
Reddy, P. Ravinder [2 ]
Venkatesh, Sriram [1 ]
机构
[1] Osmania Univ, Univ Coll Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Hyderabad 500007, Telangana, India
[2] Chaitanya Bharati Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Hyderabad 500075, Telangana, India
关键词
Additive Manufacturing; Conventional Manufacturing; Selective Laser Melting; Life Cycle Assessment; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.840
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Sustainable manufacturing aims to create products by minimizing negative impacts on the environment. It focuses on meeting the demands of present without depleting resources of succeeding generations. As a result, it is necessary to investigate the environmental impact of the production process. The goal of this research is to evaluate the environmental impact of Additive Manufacturing (AM) and Conventional Manufacturing (CM) methods for sustainable manufacturing. Two case studies are considered for comparison i.e., Sprocket Adapter used in eBike and Tie rod used in Ackermann Steering Assembly. In both the cases, components are manufactured with Conventional process and compared with simulated results of Selective Laser Melting (SLM) AM process. Emphasis has been made to compare the Cycle time, Material consumption, Energy consumption of CM without Topology Optimization (TO), AM without Topology Optimization and AM with Topology Optimization. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is conducted for the components using SimaPro LCA Software. Results show that AM without Topology optimization has less environmental impacts compared to the other two processes. Copyright (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4332 / 4340
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], WIKIPEDIA
  • [2] The rise of 3-D printing: The advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing
    Attaran, Mohsen
    [J]. BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2017, 60 (05) : 677 - 688
  • [3] azom, GRAD 304 STAINL STEE
  • [4] Environmental Impacts of Selective Laser Melting: Do Printer, Powder, Or Power Dominate?
    Faludi, Jeremy
    Baumers, Martin
    Maskery, Ian
    Hague, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2017, 21 : S144 - S156
  • [5] Metal additive manufacturing in the commercial aviation industry: A review
    Gisario, Annamaria
    Kazarian, Michele
    Martina, Filomeno
    Mehrpouya, Mehrshad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2019, 53 : 124 - 149
  • [6] Environmental assessment of Selective Laser Melting compared with Laser Cutting of 316L stainless steel: A case study for flat washers' production
    Guarino, Stefano
    Ponticelli, Gennaro Salvatore
    Venettacci, Simone
    [J]. CIRP JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 31 : 525 - 538
  • [7] A comparative assessment of energy demand and life cycle costs for additive- and subtractive-based manufacturing approaches
    Ingarao, Giuseppe
    Priarone, Paolo C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2020, 56 : 1219 - 1229
  • [8] Evaluation of environmental impact of additive and subtractive manufacturing processes for sustainable manufacturing
    Krishna, L. Siva Rama
    Srikanth, P. J.
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 45 : 3054 - 3060
  • [9] A systems-based sustainability assessment framework to capture active impacts in product life cycle/manufacturing
    Kumar, Manish
    Mani, Monto
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING FOR GLOBAL CIRCULAR ECONOMY, 2019, 33 : 647 - 654
  • [10] Big Area Additive Manufacturing of High Performance Bonded NdFeB Magnets
    Li, Ling
    Tirado, Angelica
    Nlebedim, I. C.
    Rios, Orlando
    Post, Brian
    Kunc, Vlastimil
    Lowden, R. R.
    Lara-Curzio, Edgar
    Fredette, Robert
    Ormerod, John
    Lograsso, Thomas A.
    Paranthaman, M. Parans
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6