Glass pane markings to prevent bird-window collisions: less can be more

被引:25
|
作者
Roessler, Martin [1 ]
Nemeth, Erwin [2 ]
Bruckner, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Inst Zool, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[2] BirdLife Austria, A-1070 Vienna, Austria
关键词
choice experiment; deterring effect; flight tunnel; pattern detection; visual perception; window collision; MORTALITY; INJURIES; VISION;
D O I
10.1515/biolog-2015-0057
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
To prevent birds from collisions with glass, markings on glass panes can be a valuable measure. However, to ensure public acceptance and widespread use of glass markings, maximum deterrent effect at minimum area covered has to be achieved. In this study we show that the efficacy of a deterring pattern does not necessarily depend on the size of the surface area of the marking but on orientation, spacing and dimension of the marking elements. We examined achromatic marking patterns in 1,428 choice experiments with wild birds (mostly songbirds) in a flight tunnel of seven meters length. A mist net ensured that the birds suffered no injury. Twelve markings were tested; of these, eleven effectively reduced collisions. However, considerable differences existed among the tested patterns. Covering less than 7%, 2 mm wide stripes were as effective as 13 mm wide stripes covering 50% of the glass surface. Vertical stripes 10 cm apart were significantly more effective than the same pattern in horizontal orientation. To create bird protection markings on glass, designers should consider both perceptional limits and pattern related behavioural responses of birds.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 541
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [21] Winter bird-window collisions: mitigation success, risk factors, and implementation challenges
    Brown, Barbara B.
    Kusakabe, Erika
    Antonopoulos, Angelo
    Siddoway, Sarah
    Thompson, Lisa
    PEERJ, 2019, 7
  • [22] Bird-window collisions: Mitigation efficacy and risk factors across two years
    Brown, Barbara B.
    Santos, Sabrina
    Ocampo-Penuela, Natalia
    PEERJ, 2021, 9
  • [23] Seasonal variation in drivers of bird-window collisions on the west coast of British Columbia, Canada
    Zulian, Viviane
    Norris, Andrea R.
    Cockle, Kristina L.
    Porter, Alison N.
    Do, Lauryn G.
    De Groot, Krista L.
    AVIAN CONSERVATION AND ECOLOGY, 2023, 18 (02)
  • [24] Building facade-level correlates of bird-window collisions in a small urban area
    Riding, Corey S.
    O'Connell, Timothy J.
    Loss, Scott R.
    CONDOR, 2020, 122 (01):
  • [25] Comparing the results of recall surveys and standardized searches in understanding bird-window collisions at houses
    Kummer, Justine A.
    Bayne, Erin M.
    Machtans, Craig S.
    AVIAN CONSERVATION AND ECOLOGY, 2016, 11 (01)
  • [26] Cat and dog predation on birds: The importance of indirect predation after bird-window collisions
    Rebolo-Ifran, Natalia
    Zamora-Nasca, Lucia
    Lambertucci, Sergio A.
    PERSPECTIVES IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2021, 19 (03) : 293 - 299
  • [27] Factors influencing the annual risk of bird-window collisions at residential structures in Alberta, Canada
    Bayne, Erin M.
    Scobie, Corey A.
    Rawson-Clark, Michael
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2012, 39 (07) : 583 - 592
  • [28] Opening the black box of bird-window collisions: passive video recordings in a residential backyard
    Samuels, Brendon
    Fenton, Brock
    Fernandez-Juricic, Esteban
    MacDougall-Shackleton, Scott A.
    PEERJ, 2022, 10
  • [29] Drivers of bird-window collisions in southern South America: a two- scale assessment applying citizen science
    Rebolo-Ifran, Natalia
    di Virgilio, Agustina
    Lambertucci, Sergio A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [30] Year-round monitoring reveals prevalence of fatal bird-window collisions at the Virginia Tech Corporate Research Center
    Schneider, Rebecca M.
    Barton, Christine M.
    Zirkle, Keith W.
    Greene, Caitlin F.
    Newman, Kara B.
    PEERJ, 2018, 6