Clinical Trials on Diabetic Nephropathy: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Modafferi, Sergio [1 ,2 ]
Ries, Markus [1 ]
Calabrese, Vittorio [2 ]
Schmitt, Claus. P. [1 ]
Nawroth, Peter [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Kopf, Stefan [3 ,4 ]
Peters, Verena [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Ctr Pediat & Adolescent Med, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Catania, Dept Biomed & Biotechnol Sci, Sch Med, Catania, Italy
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Endocrinol Diabetol & Clin Chem, Univ Heidelberg Hosp, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Deutsch Zentrum Diabetesforsch eV DZD, Neuherberg, Germany
[5] Helmholtz Zentrum, Joint Heidelberg IDC Translat Diabet Program, Inst Diabet & Canc, Neuherberg, Germany
关键词
ACE inhibitors; Angiotensin-II receptors; ClinicalTrials; gov; Diabetes mellitus; Diabetic nephropathy; Dipeptidyl-peptidase-4-inhibitors; Phase III clinical trials; SEVERE RENAL IMPAIRMENT; CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; LONG-TERM EFFICACY; DOUBLE-BLIND; MICROVASCULAR OUTCOMES; OXIDATIVE STRESS; TYPE-2; MICROALBUMINURIA; PROGRESSION; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1007/s13300-018-0551-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionTreatment options and decisions are often based on the results of clinical trials. We have evaluated the public availability of results from completed, registered phase III clinical trials on diabetic nephropathy and current treatment options.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional analysis in which STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology criteria were applied for design and analysis. In June 2017, 34 completed phase III clinical trials on diabetic nephropathy in the ClinicalTrials. gov registry were identified and matched to publications in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry and to those in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. If no publication was identified, the principal investigator was contacted. The ratio of published and non-published studies was calculated. Various parameters, including study design, drugs, and comparators provided, were analyzed.ResultsDrugs/supplements belonged to 26 different categories of medications, with the main ones being angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-II receptors blockers, and dipeptidyl-peptidase-4-inhibitors. Among the trials completed before 2016 (n=32), 22 (69%) were published, and ten (31%) remained unpublished. Thus, data on 11 different interventions and more than 1000 patients remained undisclosed. Mean time to publication was 26.5months, which is longer than the time constrictions imposed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act. Most trials only showed weak effects on micro- and macroalbuminuria, with an absolute risk reduction of 1.0 and 0.3%, respectively, and the number needed to treat varied between 91 and 333, without any relevant effect on end-stage-renal disease by intensive glucose-lowering treatment. Comparison of the results, however, was difficult since study design, interventions, and the renal outcome parameters vary greatly between the studies.ConclusionDespite the financial and human resources involved and the relevance for therapeutic guidelines and clinical decisions, about one-third of phase III clinical trials on diabetic nephropathy remain unpublished. Interventions used in published trials showed a low efficacy on renal outcome.FundingDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG): SFB 1118.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 243
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development and Validation of a Model That Predicts the Risk of Diabetic Nephropathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Yang, Jing
    Jiang, Sheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2022, 15 : 5089 - 5101
  • [42] Diabetic nephropathy as a model for the use of renal structural endpoints in clinical trials
    Mauer, M
    Fioretto, P
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1997, : S155 - S158
  • [43] Clinical and Molecular Characteristics of Diabetic Retinopathy and Its Severity Complications among Diabetic Patients: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
    Al Zabadi, Hamzeh
    Taha, Ibrahim
    Zagha, Rami
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (14)
  • [44] Early Detection of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Diabetic Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Amelia, Rina
    Sari Wahyuni, Arlinda
    Yunanda, Yuki
    Fujiati, Isti Ilmiati
    Harahap, Juliandi
    Wijaya, Hendri
    Zulham, Zulham
    Saktioto, Saktioto
    CURRENT DIABETES REVIEWS, 2025, 21 (02)
  • [45] Characteristics of COVID-19 clinical trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: cross-sectional analysis
    Jones, Christopher W.
    Woodford, Ashley L.
    Platts-Mills, Timothy F.
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (09):
  • [46] The impact of COVID-19 on autism research: A cross-sectional analysis of discontinued or suspended clinical trials
    Neale, Monika
    Landers, Elizabeth
    Sajjadi, Nicholas B.
    Mazur-Mosiewicz, Anya
    Hartwell, Micah
    AUTISM RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (08) : 1560 - 1564
  • [47] Citation bias favoring positive clinical trials of thrombolytics for acute ischemic stroke: a cross-sectional analysis
    Misemer, Benjamin S.
    Platts-Mills, Timothy F.
    Jones, Christopher W.
    TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [48] Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as intervention: A cross-sectional analysis of characteristics of 173 registered clinical trials
    Zhao, Shanshan
    Zaytseva, Olga
    Chang, Xiaohong
    Zhang, Boquan
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 30
  • [49] Efficacy of statins in patients with diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Shen, Xue
    Zhang, Zhongwen
    Zhang, Xiaoqian
    Zhao, Junyu
    Zhou, Xiaojun
    Xu, Qinglei
    Shang, Hongxia
    Dong, Jianjun
    Liao, Lin
    LIPIDS IN HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2016, 15 : 1 - 11
  • [50] Noncompletion and nonpublication of trials studying rare diseases: A cross-sectional analysis
    Rees, Chris A.
    Pica, Natalie
    Monuteaux, Michael C.
    Bourgeois, Florence T.
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2019, 16 (11)