Hygroscopic dilators vs balloon catheter ripening of the cervix for induction of labor in nulliparous women at term: Retrospective study

被引:14
|
作者
Shindo, Ryosuke [1 ,5 ]
Aoki, Shigeru [1 ]
Yonemoto, Naohiro [2 ,3 ,6 ,7 ]
Yamamoto, Yuriko [1 ]
Kasai, Junko [1 ]
Kasai, Michi [1 ]
Miyagi, Etsuko [4 ]
机构
[1] Yokohama City Univ, Med Ctr, Perinatal Ctr Matern & Neonate, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[2] Yokohama City Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[3] Univ Med Ctr, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[4] Yokohama City Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[5] Yokosuka Kyosai Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
[6] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Biostat, Kyoto, Japan
[7] Kyoto Univ, Fac Med, Kyoto, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 12期
关键词
RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL; UMBILICAL-CORD PROLAPSE; TRANSCERVICAL FOLEY CATHETER; JAPAN; DINOPROSTONE; METAANALYSIS; RISK; GEL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0189665
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of hygroscopic dilators and balloon catheters for ripening of the cervix in induction of labor. Study design This retrospective, observational study used data from the Successive Pregnancy Birth Registry System of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology from 2012 to 2014. Nulliparous women in whom labor was induced by mechanical methods of cervical ripening at term were enrolled. The eligible women were divided into dilator, balloon <40 mL, balloon. 40 mL, and overlapping groups. Results The groups included 4645, 4100, 6615, and 1992 women, respectively. In the overlapping group, which included the women in whom delivery was most difficult, the vaginal delivery rate was lower and the intrauterine infection and neonatal mortality rates were higher than those in the dilator group. No difference in the vaginal delivery rate was observed among the dilator, balloon <40 mL, and balloon. 40 mL groups (74.6%, 72.3%, and 73.8%, respectively; p>0.05). The vaginal instrumental delivery rate was higher in the two-balloon groups than in the dilator group. The volume of intrapartum hemorrhage was lowest in the dilator group. No significant difference in the frequencies of uterine rupture and intrauterine infection were observed among the dilator and two-balloon groups. With regard to neonatal outcomes, the frequency of a low Apgar score was statistically significantly lower in the dilator group than in the two-balloon groups. Moreover, the frequency of neonatal death tended to be lower in the dilator group than in the two-balloon groups. Conclusion With regard to cervical ripening for labor induction in nulliparous women at term, the vaginal delivery rate on using a dilator and on using a balloon seems to be equivalent. Concerning maternal complications and neonatal outcomes, cervical ripening with hygroscopic dilators in labor induction might be safer.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The association between induction of labour in nulliparous women at term and subsequent spontaneous preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study
    Ho, Nicole
    Liu, Cathy Z.
    Tanaka, Keisuke
    Lehner, Christoph
    Sekar, Renuka
    Amoako, Akwasi A.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (07) : 926 - 932
  • [42] Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Associated with Amniotomy among Nulliparous Women Undergoing Labor Induction at Term
    Battarbee, Ashley N.
    Sandoval, Grecio
    Grobman, William A.
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Tita, Alan T. N.
    Silver, Robert M.
    El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Saade, George R.
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Iams, Jay D.
    Chien, Edward K.
    Casey, Brian M.
    Gibbs, Ronald S.
    Srinivas, Sindhu K.
    Swamy, Geeta K.
    Simhan, Hyagriv N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2021, 38 : E239 - E248
  • [43] Effectiveness of Dinoprostone and Cook’s Balloon for Labor Induction in Primipara Women at Term
    Hui Du
    Na Zhang
    Chan-yun Xiao
    Guo-qiang Sun
    Yun Zhao
    Current Medical Science, 2020, 40 : 951 - 959
  • [44] Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study
    Jozwiak, Marta
    van de Lest, Hilde A.
    Burger, Nicole B.
    Dijksterhuis, Marja G. K.
    De Leeuw, Jan Willem
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2014, 93 (03) : 296 - 301
  • [45] Double-balloon catheter for induction of labor in 362 women with and without prior cesarean section
    Boisen, Anne B.
    Lokkegaard, Ellen C.
    Fuglsang, Jens
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X, 2019, 4
  • [46] Intracervical double‐balloon catheter versus dinoprostone for cervical ripening in labor induction in pregnancies with a high risk of uterine hyperstimulation
    Javier Vega Cañadas
    María Teulón González
    Natalia Pagola Limón
    María Sanz Alguacil
    María García-Luján Prieto
    Rocío Canete Riaza
    Rosa Montero-Macías
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2021, 304 : 1475 - 1484
  • [47] Induction of labor in breech presentations at term: a retrospective observational study
    Macharey, Georg
    Ulander, Veli-Matti
    Heinonen, Seppo
    Kostev, Karel
    Nuutila, Mika
    Vaisanen-Tommiska, Mervi
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 293 (03) : 549 - 555
  • [48] Nulliparas at Term with Premature Rupture of Membranes and an Unfavorable Cervix: Labor Induction with Prostaglandin or Oxytocin? A Retrospective Matched Case Study
    Lando, Maayan Bas
    Majida, Ewida
    Solnica, Amy
    Helman, Sarit
    Kalifa, Tal Margaliot
    Grisaru-Granovsky, Sorina
    Reichman, Orna
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (12)
  • [49] Conventional versus modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial
    Wen, Chaoyue
    Liu, Xuemin
    Wang, Ying
    Wang, Jun
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [50] Women's Experiences with and Preference for Induction of Labor with Oral Misoprostol or Foley Catheter at Term
    ten Eikelder, Mieke L. G.
    van de Meent, Marieke M.
    Mast, Kelly
    Rengerink, Katrien Oude
    Jozwiak, Marta
    de Graaf, Irene M.
    Scholtenhuis, Marloes A. G. Holswilder-Olde
    Roumen, Frans J. M. E.
    Porath, Martina M.
    van Loon, Aren J.
    van den Akker, Eline S.
    Rijnders, Robbert J. R.
    Feitsma, A. Hanneke
    Adriaanse, Albert H.
    Muller, Moira A.
    de Leeuw, Jan W.
    Visser, Harry
    Woiski, Mallory D.
    Rombout-de Weerd, Sabina
    van Unnik, Gijs A.
    Pernet, Paula J. M.
    Versendaal, Hans
    Mol, Ben W.
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2017, 34 (02) : 138 - 146