Hygroscopic dilators vs balloon catheter ripening of the cervix for induction of labor in nulliparous women at term: Retrospective study

被引:14
|
作者
Shindo, Ryosuke [1 ,5 ]
Aoki, Shigeru [1 ]
Yonemoto, Naohiro [2 ,3 ,6 ,7 ]
Yamamoto, Yuriko [1 ]
Kasai, Junko [1 ]
Kasai, Michi [1 ]
Miyagi, Etsuko [4 ]
机构
[1] Yokohama City Univ, Med Ctr, Perinatal Ctr Matern & Neonate, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[2] Yokohama City Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[3] Univ Med Ctr, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[4] Yokohama City Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[5] Yokosuka Kyosai Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
[6] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Biostat, Kyoto, Japan
[7] Kyoto Univ, Fac Med, Kyoto, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 12期
关键词
RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL; UMBILICAL-CORD PROLAPSE; TRANSCERVICAL FOLEY CATHETER; JAPAN; DINOPROSTONE; METAANALYSIS; RISK; GEL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0189665
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of hygroscopic dilators and balloon catheters for ripening of the cervix in induction of labor. Study design This retrospective, observational study used data from the Successive Pregnancy Birth Registry System of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology from 2012 to 2014. Nulliparous women in whom labor was induced by mechanical methods of cervical ripening at term were enrolled. The eligible women were divided into dilator, balloon <40 mL, balloon. 40 mL, and overlapping groups. Results The groups included 4645, 4100, 6615, and 1992 women, respectively. In the overlapping group, which included the women in whom delivery was most difficult, the vaginal delivery rate was lower and the intrauterine infection and neonatal mortality rates were higher than those in the dilator group. No difference in the vaginal delivery rate was observed among the dilator, balloon <40 mL, and balloon. 40 mL groups (74.6%, 72.3%, and 73.8%, respectively; p>0.05). The vaginal instrumental delivery rate was higher in the two-balloon groups than in the dilator group. The volume of intrapartum hemorrhage was lowest in the dilator group. No significant difference in the frequencies of uterine rupture and intrauterine infection were observed among the dilator and two-balloon groups. With regard to neonatal outcomes, the frequency of a low Apgar score was statistically significantly lower in the dilator group than in the two-balloon groups. Moreover, the frequency of neonatal death tended to be lower in the dilator group than in the two-balloon groups. Conclusion With regard to cervical ripening for labor induction in nulliparous women at term, the vaginal delivery rate on using a dilator and on using a balloon seems to be equivalent. Concerning maternal complications and neonatal outcomes, cervical ripening with hygroscopic dilators in labor induction might be safer.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intracervical double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone for cervical ripening in labor induction in pregnancies with a high risk of uterine hyperstimulation
    Canadas, Javier Vega
    Gonzalez, Maria Teulon
    Limon, Natalia Pagola
    Alguacil, Maria Sanz
    Prieto, Maria Garcia-Lujan
    Riaza, Rocio Canete
    Montero-Macias, Rosa
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2021, 304 (06) : 1475 - 1484
  • [32] Mode of delivery in nulliparous women with gestational hypertension undergoing early term induction of labor
    Durst, Jennifer K.
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Tang, Ying
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Campbell, Sukhkamal B.
    Biggio, Joseph R.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2017, 30 (19) : 2291 - 2296
  • [33] Labor induction in term nulliparous women with premature rupture of membranes: oxytocin versus dinoprostone
    Kulhan, Nur Gozde
    Kulhan, Mehmet
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 15 (04) : 896 - 901
  • [34] Six compared with 12 hours of Foley balloon placement for labor induction in nulliparous women with unripe cervices: a randomized controlled trial
    Appadurai, Umadevi
    Gan, Farah
    Hong, Jesrine
    Hamdan, Mukhri
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (11)
  • [35] Dinoprostone versus misoprostol: a randomized study of nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor
    Lokugamage, AU
    Forsyth, SF
    Sullivan, KR
    El Refaey, H
    Rodeck, CH
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 82 (02) : 133 - 137
  • [36] Induction of labor and pain: a randomized trial between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix
    Zanconato, Giovanni
    Bergamini, Valentino
    Mantovani, Elena
    Carlin, Roberta
    Bortolami, Oscar
    Franchi, Massimo
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2011, 24 (05) : 728 - 731
  • [37] Cervical ripening with balloon catheter for scared uterus: A three-year retrospective study
    Rossard, L.
    Arlicot, C.
    Blasco, H.
    Potin, J.
    Denis, C.
    Mercier, D.
    Perrotin, F.
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2013, 42 (05): : 480 - 487
  • [38] Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term
    Grange, J.
    Dimet, J.
    Vital, M.
    Le Thuaut, A.
    Ducarme, G.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2017, 45 (10): : 521 - 527
  • [39] Risk of Cesarean Delivery after Vaginal Inserts with Prostaglandin Analogs and Single-Balloon Catheter Used for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
    Socha, Maciej W.
    Flis, Wojciech
    Pietrus, Milosz
    Wartega, Mateusz
    BIOMEDICINES, 2023, 11 (08)
  • [40] Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel
    Pennell, C. E.
    Henderson, J. J.
    O'Neill, M. J.
    McCleery, S.
    Doherty, D. A.
    Dickinson, J. E.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 116 (11) : 1443 - 1452