Optimizing land use systems of an agricultural watershed in China to meet ecological and economic requirements for future sustainability

被引:9
|
作者
Lai, Zhengqing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chang, Di [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Shuo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Dan [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Normal Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
[2] State Key Lab Cultivat Base Geog Environm Evolut, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Ctr Collaborat Innovat Geog Informat Reso, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
[4] Jiangsu Prov Hydrol & Water Resources Invest Bur, Changzhou 213000, Peoples R China
来源
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION | 2022年 / 33卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Watershed; Landscape pattern; Nutrient loads; Economic development; Land management strategy; SWAT; NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION; RIVER-BASIN; SOIL ACIDIFICATION; ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR; TEA PLANTATIONS; SURFACE RUNOFF; SWAT MODEL; MANAGEMENT; PHOSPHORUS; EROSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01975
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The contradiction between economic development and water pollution is ever so obvious in most agricultural watersheds in China. The continuous popularization of commercial crops in hills, especially tea, has intensified water eutrophication, which has attracted close attention of the Chinese government. Under this circumstance, local authorities have proposed the returning of tea plantations to forests, which would distinctly inhibit the development of rural economics. Hence, we employed a calibrated SWAT model to determine the total nitrogen/total phosphorus (TN/TP) loads in the reservoir, nutrient contribution of each land use type, and landscape pattern in a representative agricultural watershed. Aimed at the synchronous development of the economy and environment, this research study investigated the correlation between landscape pattern and nutrient output to accordingly propose alternative management strategies based on the correlation and actual watershed situation. Correlation analysis suggested that the landscape pattern prominently affects nutrient output in farmlands, tea plantations, orchards, and grasslands, and that the impact varies with the land use types and landscape parameters. Furthermore, a stepwise multiple regression model revealed that the landscape pattern could effectively predict nutrient output in farmlands, tea plantations, orchards, and grasslands. The aggregation index (AI) (R2 = 0.996, p < 0.05) and contiguity index (CONTIG) (R2 = 0.963, p < 0.01) are the primary landscape drivers for the export of TN and TP in farmlands, respectively, and the percentage of landscape (PLAND) is the key driver for TN loss in tea plantations (R2 = 0.841, p < 0.05). The fractal dimension index (FRAC) is the pivotal driver both for TN (R2 = 0.969, p < 0.01) and TP (R2 = 0.845, p < 0.05) export from orchards. According to the actual watershed situation and the relationship between nutrient output and landscape pattern, six alternative management strategies were performed: planting tea along contour lines (S1), constructing filter strips downstream tea plantations and orchards (S2), changing the shape of orchards (S3), controlling the nutrient emissions of residential areas (S4), returning farmlands to forests (S5), and a combination of S1S5 (S6). All these measures are superior to the current government strategy (returning tea plantations around reservoirs to forests) in terms of both cutting down reservoir nutrient loads and reducing economic loss. Among them, S6 is the optimal strategy; using this, TN and TP loads are expected to be reduced by 51.64% and 58.96%, respectively, compared with those in 2019, and the economic loss will be far lower than that upon implementation of the current government strategy. This study has provided detailed suggestions for watersheds plagued by the contradiction between agricultural economic development and water pollution.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agricultural land use and the sustainability of social-ecological systems
    Paz, Diego Bengochea
    Henderson, Kirsten
    Loreau, Michel
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2020, 437 (437)
  • [2] Improving future agricultural sustainability by optimizing crop distributions in China
    Guan, Qi
    Tang, Jing
    Davis, Kyle Frankel
    Kong, Mengxiang
    Feng, Lian
    Shi, Kun
    Schurgers, Guy
    PNAS NEXUS, 2025, 4 (01):
  • [3] Rewards for ecological goods - requirements and perspectives for agricultural land use
    Gerowitt, B
    Isselstein, J
    Marggraf, R
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 98 (1-3) : 541 - 547
  • [4] Transformative optimisation of agricultural land use to meet future food demands
    Koh, Lian Pin
    Koellner, Thomas
    Ghazoul, Jaboury
    PEERJ, 2013, 1
  • [5] ASSESSMENT OF THE ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY OF AGRICULTURAL LAND USE IN THE TERRITORIAL STRUCTURE OF REGION
    Dudych, Halyna
    Dudych, Lesia
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES MANAGEMENT ECONOMIC ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 18 (04) : 87 - 92
  • [6] The use and evaluation of ecological and economic efficiency of agricultural land in Ukraine
    Perovich, Ihor
    Perovich, Lesya
    Hulko, Oleksandra
    Malanchuk, Mariia
    GEODESY AND CARTOGRAPHY, 2020, 69 (02): : 189 - 204
  • [7] Combined ecological and economic modelling in agricultural land use scenarios
    Münier, B
    Birr-Pedersen, K
    Schou, JS
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2004, 174 (1-2) : 5 - 18
  • [8] Ecological and economic aspects of agricultural land use in European integration processes
    Stepanenko, T. O.
    Khloponina-Gnatenko, O., I
    Stankevych, S., V
    Sokolov, A. S.
    UKRAINIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2021, 11 (01): : 181 - 185
  • [9] SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT AS AN INSTRUMENT TO IMPROVE ECOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF AGRICULTURAL LAND USE
    Gamajunova, Valentina
    Iskakova, Oksana
    Yanchuk, Volodymyr
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES MANAGEMENT ECONOMIC ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 20 (04) : 219 - 225
  • [10] Governing spillovers of agricultural land use through voluntary sustainability standards: A coverage analysis of sustainability requirements
    Sonderegger, Gabi
    Heinimann, Andreas
    Diogo, Vasco
    Oberlack, Christoph
    EARTH SYSTEM GOVERNANCE, 2022, 14