Coping with somatic illnesses in online support groups: Do the feared disadvantages actually occur?

被引:70
作者
van Uden-Kraan, C. F. [1 ]
Drossaert, C. H. C. [1 ]
Taal, E. [1 ]
Lebrun, C. E. I. [2 ]
Drossaers-Bakker, K. W. [1 ,2 ]
Smit, W. M. [3 ]
Seydel, E. R. [1 ]
de laar, M. A. F. J. van [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Fac Behav Sci, Inst Behav Res, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Med Spectrum Twente, Dept Rheumatol, NL-7500 KA Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Med Spectrum Twente, Dept Internal Med, NL-7500 KA Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
support groups; internet; breast cancer; fibromyalgia; arthritis; content analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.014
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
People in stressful circumstances, such as serious health conditions, often turn to support groups. With the increase in the availability and popularity of the Internet, the possibility has arisen to join support groups online. Various authors have raised potential disadvantages of these groups, such as the lack of control of the quality of the information that is exchanged and the concern that the exchange within the group might include socially inappropriate. remarks. In this study we explored to what extent these potential disadvantages actually occur. In addition, we explored who uses Dutch online support groups and what is exchanged by the participants. By means of "content analysis" we analyzed a random sample of 1500 messages from publicly available online support groups for patients with breast cancer, arthritis and fibromyalgia. It appeared that the online support groups under study were mainly used by female patients. A major part of the postings contained "off topic" remarks. Popular health related topics were "restrictions in daily life" and "regular medication". Only in a minor proportion of the postings, potential disadvantages were present. Therefore this study suggests that online support groups are a viable option for support. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 324
页数:16
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]   Cognitive, emotional, and language processes in disclosure [J].
Pennebaker, JW ;
Francis, ME .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 1996, 10 (06) :601-626
[22]   Online support for caregivers of people with a mental illness [J].
Perron, B .
PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION JOURNAL, 2002, 26 (01) :70-77
[23]   Is E-health progressing faster than E-health researchers? [J].
Potts, Henry W. W. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2006, 8 (03) :3P
[24]   Empathic communities: balancing emotional and factual communication [J].
Preece, J .
INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS, 1999, 12 (01) :63-77
[25]   The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone [J].
Preece, J ;
Nonnecke, B ;
Andrews, D .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2004, 20 (02) :201-223
[26]   To me, it's my life: Medical communication, trust, and activism in cyberspace [J].
Radin, P .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 62 (03) :591-601
[27]  
Riessman F., 1997, SOC POLICY, V27, P6
[28]  
Salem DA, 1997, J COMMUNITY PSYCHOL, V25, P189, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199703)25:2<189::AID-JCOP7>3.3.CO
[29]  
2-I
[30]   Online help: Cancer patients participate in a computer-mediated support group [J].
Weinberg, N ;
Schmale, J ;
Uken, J ;
Wessel, K .
HEALTH & SOCIAL WORK, 1996, 21 (01) :24-29