Modeling term proximity for probabilistic information retrieval models

被引:63
作者
He, Ben [1 ]
Huang, Jimmy Xiangji [1 ]
Zhou, Xiaofeng [1 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Sch Informat Technol, Informat Retrieval & Knowledge Management Res Lab, Toronto, ON M3J 2R7, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Proximity; Probabilistic models; BM25; WEB;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2011.03.007
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Proximity among query terms has been found to be useful for improving retrieval performance. However, its application to classical probabilistic information retrieval models, such as Okapi's BM25, remains a challenging research problem. In this paper, we propose to improve the classical BM25 model by utilizing the term proximity evidence. Four novel methods, namely a window-based N-gram Counting method, Survival Analysis over different statistics, including the Poisson process, an exponential distribution and an empirical function, are proposed to model the proximity between query terms. Through extensive experiments on standard TREC collections, our proposed proximity-based BM25 model, called BM25P, is compared to strong state-of-the-art evaluation baselines, including the original unigram BM25 model, the Markov Random Field model, and the positional language model. According to the experimental results, the window-based N-gram Counting method, and Survival Analysis over an exponential distribution are the most effective among all four proposed methods, which lead to marked improvement over the baselines. This shows that the use of term proximity considerably enhances the retrieval effectiveness of the classical probabilistic models. It is therefore recommended to deploy a term proximity component in retrieval systems that employ probabilistic models. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3017 / 3031
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Amati G., 2003, Probabilistic Models for Information Retrieval based on Divergence from Randomness
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1971, The SMART Retrieval System-Experiments in Automatic Document Processing
[3]  
[Anonymous], LANGUAGE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, SIGIR 98 P 21 ANN IN, DOI DOI 10.1145/290941.291008
[5]  
Bazan J, 2003, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V2871, P160
[6]  
Beaulieu M., SPECIAL PUBLICATION, P143
[7]  
Buttcher S., 2006, Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, P621, DOI 10.1145/1148170.1148285
[8]  
Buttcher S., 2005, SPECIAL PUBLICATION, P1
[9]   Learning semantic relatedness from term discrimination information [J].
Cai, D. ;
van Rijsbergen, C. J. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (02) :1860-1875
[10]  
Crestani F., 2009, ENCY DATABASE SYSTEM, P1652