Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Targeted 18F-DCFPyL Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for the Preoperative Staging of High Risk Prostate Cancer: Results of a Prospective, Phase II, Single Center Study

被引:85
作者
Gorin, Michael A. [1 ,2 ]
Rowe, Steven P. [4 ]
Patel, Hiten D. [1 ,2 ]
Vidal, Igor [3 ]
Mana-ay, Margarita [1 ,2 ]
Javadi, Mehrbod S. [4 ]
Solnes, Lilja B. [4 ]
Ross, Ashley E. [1 ,2 ]
Schaeffer, Edward M. [5 ]
Bivalacqua, Trinity J. [1 ,2 ]
Partin, Alan W. [1 ,2 ]
Pienta, Kenneth J. [1 ,2 ]
Szabo, Zsolt [4 ]
De Marzo, Angelo M. [3 ]
Pomper, Martin G. [4 ]
Allaf, Mohamad E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Urol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; 2-(3-(1-carboxy-5-((6-fluoropyridine-3-carbonyl)amino)pentyl)ureido) pentanedioic acid; positron-emission tomography; tomography; X-ray computed; diagnosis; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PET; PSMA; MANAGEMENT; INHIBITORS; GUIDELINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.070
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We prospectively evaluated the diagnostic performance of prostate specific membrane antigen targeted F-18-DCFPyL positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in the preoperative staging of men at high risk for harboring metastatic prostate cancer despite a negative conventional staging evaluation. Materials and Methods: Men with clinically localized high or very high risk prostate cancer were imaged with F-18-DCFPyL positron emission tomography/computerized tomography before undergoing radical prostatectomy with standardized pelvic lymph node dissection. The scans were interpreted by 2 blinded nuclear medicine readers and assessed for interreader variability as well as diagnostic accuracy for pelvic lymph node staging. Surgical pathology served as the reference standard to which F-18-DCFPyL scan findings were compared. Results: A total of 25 men contributed analyzable data to this study. Seven of these patients (28%) were found to have 1 or more positive lymph nodes on surgical pathology. Sites of radiotracer uptake were identified in the prostate of all imaged patients. The 2 readers identified the same number of prostatic lesions in 22 patients (88%), of whom all had at least 1 intraprostatic lesion in common between the 2 reads. Additionally, the readers assigned the same N stage to 46 of 50 individual lymph node packets (92%). Following reconciliation of the relatively few discordant imaging reads, 7 patients (28%) were found to have 1 or more sites of radiotracer uptake in the pelvis consistent with N1 disease, resulting in 71.4% sensitivity (95% CI 29.0-96.3) and 88.9% specificity (95% CI 65.3-98.6). Analysis at the level of individual nodal packets resulted in 66.7% sensitivity ( 95% CI 29.9-92.5) and 92.7% specificity (95% CI 80.1-98.5). Three men (12%) had evidence of M1a disease. Conclusions: F-18-DCFPyL positron emission tomography/computerized tomography allowed for accurate detection of prostate cancer sites in men believed to have clinically localized disease based on conventional imaging. Our results support the need for a larger study to more precisely define the diagnostic accuracy of this novel molecular imaging test.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 132
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risk of metastatic disease on 68gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan for primary staging of 1253 men at the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Yaxley, John W.
    Raveenthiran, Sheliyan
    Nouhaud, Francois-Xavier
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    Yaxley, William J.
    Coughlin, Geoff
    Yaxley, Anna J.
    Gianduzzo, Troy
    Kua, Boon
    McEwan, Louise
    Wong, David
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (03) : 401 - 407
  • [32] Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in prostate cancer: a step toward personalized medicine
    Bouchelouche, Kirsten
    Choyke, Peter L.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2016, 28 (03) : 216 - 221
  • [33] 18F-DCFPyL positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging-guided ultrasound fusion biopsy is an identical pathway in prostate cancer diagnosis
    Niu, Shaoxi
    Liu, Yachao
    Ding, Xiaohui
    Xu, Yong
    Yu, Hongkai
    Feng, Xiaodong
    Chang, Xiao
    Wang, Haiyi
    Li, Jinhang
    Gong, Huijie
    Ao, Liyan
    Liu, Jiajin
    Lin, Mu
    Wang, Baojun
    Ma, Xin
    Xu, Baixuan
    Zhang, Xu
    PROSTATE, 2023, 83 (02) : 142 - 150
  • [34] Uptake of the prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted PET radiotracer 18F-DCFPyL in elastofibroma dorsi
    Gorin, Michael A.
    Marashdeh, Wael
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Allaf, Mohammad E.
    Pienta, Kenneth J.
    Pomper, Martin G.
    Rowe, Steven P.
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 38 (09) : 795 - 798
  • [35] Comparison of Multiple Segmentation Methods for Volumetric Delineation of Primary Prostate Cancer with Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT
    Wang, Felicia
    Liu, Chen
    Vidal, Igor
    Mana-Ay, Margarita
    Voter, Andrew F.
    Solnes, Lilja B.
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Gafita, Andrei
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    Bivalacqua, Trinity J.
    Pienta, Kenneth J.
    Pomper, Martin G.
    Lodge, Martin A.
    Song, Daniel Y.
    Oldan, Jorge D.
    Allaf, Mohamad E.
    Marzo, Angelo M. De
    Sheikhbahaei, Sara
    Groin, Michael A.
    Rowe, Steven P.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 65 (01) : 87 - 93
  • [36] Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Oncological Applications beyond Prostate Cancer in Comparison to Other Radiopharmaceuticals
    Miceli, Alberto
    Liberini, Virginia
    Pepe, Giovanna
    Dondi, Francesco
    Vento, Antonio
    Lavarini, Lorenzo Jonghi
    Celesti, Greta
    Gazzilli, Maria
    Serani, Francesca
    Guglielmo, Priscilla
    Buschiazzo, Ambra
    Filice, Rossella
    Alongi, Pierpaolo
    Laudicella, Riccardo
    Santo, Giulia
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (10)
  • [37] Synthesis and positron emission tomography evaluation of 18F-Glu-Urea-Lys, a prostate-specific membrane antigen-based imaging agent for prostate cancer
    Fan, Weiwei
    Zhang, Zhiwei
    Zhu, Zheng
    Yang, Deyong
    Chen, Xiaochi
    Wang, Jianbo
    Chen, Feng
    Song, Xishuang
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2015, 10 (04) : 2299 - 2302
  • [38] A comparison study of 68gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for locoregional staging of prostate cancer
    Patel, Kartik Shashikant
    Singh, Tarun
    Raghuvanshi, Kshitij
    Sonar, Sameer
    Chaudhari, Rajeev
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 35 (01) : 36 - 41
  • [39] Can68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography provide an accurate lymph node staging for patients with medium/high risk prostate cancer? A diagnostic meta-analysis
    Peng, Lei
    Li, Jinze
    Meng, Chunyang
    Li, Jinming
    You, Chengyu
    Tang, Dandan
    Wei, Tangqiang
    Xiong, Wei
    Li, Yunxiang
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [40] The Role of 68Ga-PSMA Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for Preoperative Lymph Node Staging in Intermediate/High Risk Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-Analysi
    Tu, Xiang
    Zhang, Chichen
    Liu, Zhenhua
    Shen, Guohua
    Wu, Xiaoai
    Nie, Ling
    Chang, Tiancong
    Xu, He
    Bao, Yige
    Yang, Lu
    Wei, Qiang
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10