Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Targeted 18F-DCFPyL Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for the Preoperative Staging of High Risk Prostate Cancer: Results of a Prospective, Phase II, Single Center Study

被引:85
作者
Gorin, Michael A. [1 ,2 ]
Rowe, Steven P. [4 ]
Patel, Hiten D. [1 ,2 ]
Vidal, Igor [3 ]
Mana-ay, Margarita [1 ,2 ]
Javadi, Mehrbod S. [4 ]
Solnes, Lilja B. [4 ]
Ross, Ashley E. [1 ,2 ]
Schaeffer, Edward M. [5 ]
Bivalacqua, Trinity J. [1 ,2 ]
Partin, Alan W. [1 ,2 ]
Pienta, Kenneth J. [1 ,2 ]
Szabo, Zsolt [4 ]
De Marzo, Angelo M. [3 ]
Pomper, Martin G. [4 ]
Allaf, Mohamad E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Urol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; 2-(3-(1-carboxy-5-((6-fluoropyridine-3-carbonyl)amino)pentyl)ureido) pentanedioic acid; positron-emission tomography; tomography; X-ray computed; diagnosis; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PET; PSMA; MANAGEMENT; INHIBITORS; GUIDELINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.070
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We prospectively evaluated the diagnostic performance of prostate specific membrane antigen targeted F-18-DCFPyL positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in the preoperative staging of men at high risk for harboring metastatic prostate cancer despite a negative conventional staging evaluation. Materials and Methods: Men with clinically localized high or very high risk prostate cancer were imaged with F-18-DCFPyL positron emission tomography/computerized tomography before undergoing radical prostatectomy with standardized pelvic lymph node dissection. The scans were interpreted by 2 blinded nuclear medicine readers and assessed for interreader variability as well as diagnostic accuracy for pelvic lymph node staging. Surgical pathology served as the reference standard to which F-18-DCFPyL scan findings were compared. Results: A total of 25 men contributed analyzable data to this study. Seven of these patients (28%) were found to have 1 or more positive lymph nodes on surgical pathology. Sites of radiotracer uptake were identified in the prostate of all imaged patients. The 2 readers identified the same number of prostatic lesions in 22 patients (88%), of whom all had at least 1 intraprostatic lesion in common between the 2 reads. Additionally, the readers assigned the same N stage to 46 of 50 individual lymph node packets (92%). Following reconciliation of the relatively few discordant imaging reads, 7 patients (28%) were found to have 1 or more sites of radiotracer uptake in the pelvis consistent with N1 disease, resulting in 71.4% sensitivity (95% CI 29.0-96.3) and 88.9% specificity (95% CI 65.3-98.6). Analysis at the level of individual nodal packets resulted in 66.7% sensitivity ( 95% CI 29.9-92.5) and 92.7% specificity (95% CI 80.1-98.5). Three men (12%) had evidence of M1a disease. Conclusions: F-18-DCFPyL positron emission tomography/computerized tomography allowed for accurate detection of prostate cancer sites in men believed to have clinically localized disease based on conventional imaging. Our results support the need for a larger study to more precisely define the diagnostic accuracy of this novel molecular imaging test.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 132
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Detection Rate of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Tracers for Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography in Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Crocerossa, Fabio
    Marchioni, Michele
    Novara, Giacomo
    Carbonara, Umberto
    Ferro, Matteo
    Russo, Giorgio I.
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Di Nicola, Marta
    Damiano, Rocco
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Cantiello, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (02) : 356 - 369
  • [22] 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) for primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review
    Julia Corfield
    Marlon Perera
    Damien Bolton
    Nathan Lawrentschuk
    World Journal of Urology, 2018, 36 : 519 - 527
  • [23] Patterns of uptake of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted 18F-DCFPyL in peripheral ganglia
    Rudolf A. Werner
    Sara Sheikhbahaei
    Krystyna M. Jones
    Mehrbod S. Javadi
    Lilja B. Solnes
    Ashley E. Ross
    Mohamad E. Allaf
    Kenneth J. Pienta
    Constantin Lapa
    Andreas K. Buck
    Takahiro Higuchi
    Martin G. Pomper
    Michael A. Gorin
    Steven P. Rowe
    Annals of Nuclear Medicine, 2017, 31 : 696 - 702
  • [24] Anti-3-[18F]FACBC Positron Emission Tomography-Computerized Tomography and 111In-Capromab Pendetide Single Photon Emission Computerized Tomography-Computerized Tomography for Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma: Results of a Prospective Clinical Trial
    Schuster, David M.
    Nieh, Peter T.
    Jani, Ashesh B.
    Amzat, Rianot
    Bowman, F. DuBois
    Halkar, Raghuveer K.
    Master, Viraj A.
    Nye, Jonathon A.
    Odewole, Oluwaseun A.
    Osunkoya, Adeboye O.
    Savir-Baruch, Bital
    Alaei-Taleghani, Pooneh
    Goodman, Mark M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (05) : 1446 - 1453
  • [25] 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) for primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review
    Corfield, Julia
    Perera, Marlon
    Bolton, Damien
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (04) : 519 - 527
  • [26] The Predictive Value of Preoperative Negative Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Imaging for Lymph Node Metastatic Prostate Cancer
    Meijer, Dennie
    de Barros, Hilda A.
    van Leeuwen, Pim J.
    Bodar, Yves J. L.
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    Donswijk, Maarten L.
    Hendrikse, N. Harry
    van Moorselaar, R. Jeroen A.
    Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A.
    Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
    Vis, Andre N.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (06) : 1655 - 1661
  • [27] Comparative study between 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and conventional imaging in the initial staging of prostate cancer
    Wong, Hui Sze
    Leung, John
    Bartholomeusz, Dylan
    Sutherland, Peter
    Le, Hien
    Nottage, Michelle
    Iankov, Ivan
    Chang, Joe H.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 62 (06) : 816 - 822
  • [28] Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in the management of recurrent prostate cancer
    Afaq, Asim
    Bomanji, Jamshed
    BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2018, 128 (01) : 37 - 48
  • [29] Optimal Timing of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy
    Luiting, Henk B.
    van Leeuwen, Pim J.
    Remmers, Sebastiaan
    Donswijk, Maarten
    Busstra, Martijn B.
    Bakker, Ingrid L.
    Brabander, T.
    Stokkel, Marcel
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (03) : 503 - 509
  • [30] Using prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography to guide prostate biopsies and stage men at high-risk of prostate cancer
    Bodar, Yves J. L.
    Boeve, Liselotte M. S.
    van Leeuwen, Pim J.
    Baars, Phillippe C.
    Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A.
    van Haarst, Ernst P.
    Oddens, Jorg R.
    Donswijk, Maarten L.
    van Riel, Luigi A. M. J. G.
    Scheltema, Matthijs J.
    Meijer, Dennie
    Hendrikse, N. Harry
    Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
    Vis, Andre N.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 132 (06) : 705 - 712