共 50 条
Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Targeted 18F-DCFPyL Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for the Preoperative Staging of High Risk Prostate Cancer: Results of a Prospective, Phase II, Single Center Study
被引:85
作者:
Gorin, Michael A.
[1
,2
]
Rowe, Steven P.
[4
]
Patel, Hiten D.
[1
,2
]
Vidal, Igor
[3
]
Mana-ay, Margarita
[1
,2
]
Javadi, Mehrbod S.
[4
]
Solnes, Lilja B.
[4
]
Ross, Ashley E.
[1
,2
]
Schaeffer, Edward M.
[5
]
Bivalacqua, Trinity J.
[1
,2
]
Partin, Alan W.
[1
,2
]
Pienta, Kenneth J.
[1
,2
]
Szabo, Zsolt
[4
]
De Marzo, Angelo M.
[3
]
Pomper, Martin G.
[4
]
Allaf, Mohamad E.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Urol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词:
prostatic neoplasms;
2-(3-(1-carboxy-5-((6-fluoropyridine-3-carbonyl)amino)pentyl)ureido) pentanedioic acid;
positron-emission tomography;
tomography;
X-ray computed;
diagnosis;
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY;
PET;
PSMA;
MANAGEMENT;
INHIBITORS;
GUIDELINE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.070
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Purpose: We prospectively evaluated the diagnostic performance of prostate specific membrane antigen targeted F-18-DCFPyL positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in the preoperative staging of men at high risk for harboring metastatic prostate cancer despite a negative conventional staging evaluation. Materials and Methods: Men with clinically localized high or very high risk prostate cancer were imaged with F-18-DCFPyL positron emission tomography/computerized tomography before undergoing radical prostatectomy with standardized pelvic lymph node dissection. The scans were interpreted by 2 blinded nuclear medicine readers and assessed for interreader variability as well as diagnostic accuracy for pelvic lymph node staging. Surgical pathology served as the reference standard to which F-18-DCFPyL scan findings were compared. Results: A total of 25 men contributed analyzable data to this study. Seven of these patients (28%) were found to have 1 or more positive lymph nodes on surgical pathology. Sites of radiotracer uptake were identified in the prostate of all imaged patients. The 2 readers identified the same number of prostatic lesions in 22 patients (88%), of whom all had at least 1 intraprostatic lesion in common between the 2 reads. Additionally, the readers assigned the same N stage to 46 of 50 individual lymph node packets (92%). Following reconciliation of the relatively few discordant imaging reads, 7 patients (28%) were found to have 1 or more sites of radiotracer uptake in the pelvis consistent with N1 disease, resulting in 71.4% sensitivity (95% CI 29.0-96.3) and 88.9% specificity (95% CI 65.3-98.6). Analysis at the level of individual nodal packets resulted in 66.7% sensitivity ( 95% CI 29.9-92.5) and 92.7% specificity (95% CI 80.1-98.5). Three men (12%) had evidence of M1a disease. Conclusions: F-18-DCFPyL positron emission tomography/computerized tomography allowed for accurate detection of prostate cancer sites in men believed to have clinically localized disease based on conventional imaging. Our results support the need for a larger study to more precisely define the diagnostic accuracy of this novel molecular imaging test.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 132
页数:7
相关论文