Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy - A randomized clinical trial

被引:79
作者
Kazemier, G
DeZeeuw, GR
Lange, JF
Hop, WCJ
Bonjer, HJ
机构
[1] Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Dijkzigt, 3015 GD Rotterdam
[2] Department of General Surgery, St. Clara Hospital, 3078 HT Rotterdam
[3] Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus University, 3015 GE Rotterdam
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 1997年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
appendicitis; appendectomy; laparoscopy; randomized;
D O I
10.1007/s004649900358
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A randomized clinical trial was performed to compare open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). Methods: 201 patients with similar characteristics of appendicitis were randomized to either OA or LA. Operative time and technique, reintroduction of diet, postoperative pain, use of analgesia, hospital stay, and complications were documented. Results: 104 patients were allocated to the OA group and 97 to the LA group. Postoperative pain was significantly less in the LA group on the 1st (p < 0.001) and 2nd (p < 0.001) postoperative day, resulting in less use of analgesics on both days (p < 0.001). Restoration of diet was similar in both groups. Mean operative time was longer in the LA group: 61 vs 41 min (p < 0.001). Postoperative complications did not differ in either group, except for wound infections (six OA group vs zero LA group, p < 0.05). Mean hospital stay was similar in both groups. Conclusions: LA results in less postoperative pain and fewer wound infections. The laparoscopic procedure is technically more demanding to perform, resulting in longer operative time.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 340
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] ATTWOOD SEA, 1992, SURGERY, V112, P497
  • [2] APPENDICITIS NEAR ITS CENTENARY
    BERRY, J
    MALT, RA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1984, 200 (05) : 567 - 575
  • [3] BONANNI F, 1994, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V179, P273
  • [4] GOODBYE TO LATE BOWEL OBSTRUCTION AFTER APPENDECTOMY
    DEWILDE, RL
    [J]. LANCET, 1991, 338 (8773) : 1012 - 1012
  • [5] CELIOSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - PRELIMINARY-REPORT OF 36 CASES
    DUBOIS, F
    ICARD, P
    BERTHELOT, G
    LEVARD, H
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1990, 211 (01) : 60 - 62
  • [6] A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
    FRAZEE, RC
    ROBERTS, JW
    SYMMONDS, RE
    SNYDER, SK
    HENDRICKS, JC
    SMITH, RW
    CUSTER, MD
    HARRISON, JB
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 219 (06) : 725 - 731
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Prospective randomized trial
    Hansen, JB
    Smithers, BM
    Schache, D
    Wall, DR
    Miller, BJ
    Menzies, BL
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 20 (01) : 17 - 21
  • [8] HESSELINK EJ, 1995, TRENDS SURG, P14
  • [9] KOK D, 1983, ACT ENDOSC, V13, P5
  • [10] RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN APPENDECTOMY
    KUM, CK
    NGOI, SS
    GOH, PMY
    TEKANT, Y
    ISAAC, JR
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 80 (12) : 1599 - 1600