Sex-related Differences in Emergency Department Renal Colic Management: Females Have Fewer Computed Tomography Scans but Similar Outcomes

被引:13
作者
Innes, Grant D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Scheuermeyer, Frank X. [4 ]
Law, Michael R. [5 ,6 ]
Mcrae, Andrew D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Weber, Bryce A. [3 ,7 ]
Boyda, Heidi N. [1 ]
Lonergan, Kevin [8 ]
Andruchow, James E. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Rockyview Gen Hosp, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] St Pauls Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Univ British Columbia, Ctr Hlth Serv & Policy Res, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[7] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Div Urol Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[8] Alberta Hlth Serv, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
URETERAL CALCULI; GENDER; PREVALENCE; VISITS; STONES; TRENDS; IMPACT; PAIN;
D O I
10.1111/acem.13041
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Sex-related differences occur in many areas of medicine. Emergency department (ED) studies have suggested differences in access to care, diagnostic imaging use, pain management, and intervention. We investigated sex-based differences in the care and outcomes for ED patients with acute renal colic. Methods: This was a multicenter population-based retrospective observational cohort study using administrative data and supplemented by structured chart review. All patients seen in Calgary Health Region EDs between January 1 and December 31, 2014, with an ED diagnosis of renal colic based on the following ICD-10 codes were eligible for inclusion: calculus of kidney (N200), calculus of ureter (N201), calculus of kidney with calculus of ureter (N202), hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction (N132), unspecified renal colic (N23), and unspecified urinary calculus (N209). ED visit data and test results were accessed in the regional ED clinical database. Stone characteristics were captured from diagnostic imaging reports. Regional hospital databases were used to identify subsequent ED encounters, hospital admissions, and surgical procedures within 60 days. Outcomes were stratified by sex. The primary outcome, intended as a marker of overall effectiveness of ED care, was the unscheduled 7-day ED revisit rate among patients who were discharged home after their index ED visit. Secondary outcomes included ED pain management as reflected by administration of narcotics or intravenous nonsteroidals, the performance of advanced imaging-either ultrasound (US) or computed tomography (CT), and the proportion of patients who required hospitalization or surgical intervention within 60 days. Results: From January 1 to December 31, 2014, a total of 3,104 eligible patients were studied: 1,111 women (35.8%) and 1,993 men (64.2%). Baseline characteristics, access times, analgesic use, and admission rates were similar in both groups. Men were more likely to have CT (68.9% vs. 58.5%, difference = 10.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.8 to 14.0) while women were more likely to have US (20.8% vs. 9.6%, difference = 11.2%, 95% CI = 8.4 to 13.9). At 7 days, 17.9% of women and 19.0% of men who were discharged after their index ED visit required an ED revisit (difference = 1.1%, 95% CI = -2.8 to 4.9). Men were more likely to be hospitalized at 7 days (9.8% vs. 6.5%, difference = 3.3%, 95% CI = 0.6 to 6.0). Conclusion: This study shows greater reliance on US in females but no other sex-specific differences in the management of ED patients with acute renal colic. Higher CT use in men was not associated with improved outcomes, and we found no important differences in access to care, diagnostic or treatment intensity, or revisit rates as a marker of care effectiveness. (C) 2016 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:1153 / 1160
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, COMP TOM IM DIAGN RE
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, 5 THINGS PHYS PAT SH
  • [3] Research Priorities for the Influence of Gender on Diagnostic Imaging Choices in the Emergency Department Setting
    Ashurst, John V.
    Cherney, Alan R.
    Evans, Elizabeth M.
    Hall, Michael Kennedy
    Hess, Erik P.
    Kline, Jeffrey A.
    Mitchell, Alice M.
    Mills, Angela M.
    Weigner, Michael B.
    Moore, Christopher L.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 21 (12) : 1431 - 1437
  • [4] Diagnostic and treatment patterns for renal colic in US emergency departments
    Brown, Jeremy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 38 (01) : 87 - 92
  • [5] Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT
    Coll, DM
    Varanelli, MJ
    Smith, RC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (01) : 101 - 103
  • [6] Projected Cancer Risks From Computed Tomographic Scans Performed in the United States in 2007
    de Gonzalez, Amy Berrington
    Mahesh, Mahadevappa
    Kim, Kwang-Pyo
    Bhargavan, Mythreyi
    Lewis, Rebecca
    Mettler, Fred
    Land, Charles
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 169 (22) : 2071 - 2077
  • [7] Emergency department visits, use of imaging, and drugs for urolithiasis have increased in the United States
    Fwu, Chyng-Wen
    Eggers, Paul W.
    Kimmel, Paul L.
    Kusek, John W.
    Kirkali, Ziya
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 83 (03) : 479 - 486
  • [8] Management of ureteric stones: issues and controversies
    Gettman, MT
    Segura, JW
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 95 : 85 - 93
  • [9] Does diagnosis change as a result of repeat renal colic computed tomography scan in patients with a history of kidney stones?
    Goldstone, Adam
    Bushnell, Andrew
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 28 (03) : 291 - 295
  • [10] CT in detecting urinary tract calculi: Influence on patient imaging and clinical outcomes
    Gottlieb, RH
    La, TC
    Erturk, EN
    Sotack, JL
    Voci, SL
    Holloway, RG
    Syed, L
    Mikityansky, I
    Tirkes, AT
    Elmarzouky, R
    Zwemer, FL
    Joseph, JV
    Davis, D
    DiGrazio, WJ
    Messing, EM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (02) : 441 - 449