Impact of a higher fecal immunochemistry test cut-off on pathology detected in subsequent rounds of a colorectal screening program

被引:8
作者
Gibson, David J. [1 ]
Mooney, Therese [1 ]
Mooney, Jennifer [1 ]
Mulcahy, Hugh E. [2 ]
O'Donoghue, Diarmuid [1 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Univ Hosp, BowelScreen, Natl Bowel Screening Programme, Dublin, Ireland
[2] St Vincents Univ Hosp, Ctr Colorectal Dis, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.015
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: Fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is superior to the traditional binary fecal occult blood test. Its quantitative nature allows the investigator to choose a positivity threshold to match cost and endoscope capacity. The optimal threshold is still debated. BowelScreen, the Irish national colorectal cancer screening program, has a cut-off of 45 mu gHb/g feces, and in this studywe investigated the impact of this threshold on pathology detected in round 2 in individuals who had a negative result for round 1 FIT (FIT1). Methods: All individuals with a negative FIT1 result who completed a round 2 FIT (FIT2) 2 years later were included. Pathology outcomes for individuals who had positive FIT2 results were correlated with FIT1 levels. Results: A total of 37,877 individuals had negative FIT1 results and completed FIT2. One thousand two hundred thirty (3.2%) had positive FIT2 results (702 men [57%], median age 69, age range 60-70 years). Quantitative analysis showed that at an FIT1 level <5 mu g Hb/g feces, 2.3% had positive FIT2 results. At a higher cut-off of 40.1 to 45 mu g Hb/g feces, 15.6% of individuals had positive FIT2 results. One thousand two (81.5%) underwent colonoscopy, with clinical outcomes in all cases. Three hundred fifty-one (35%) had normal colonoscopy results. The proportion of individuals with normal colonoscopy results decreased as FIT1 levels rose. Conversely, advanced pathology (CRC thorn high-risk adenomas) rates rose from 7% to 50% when FIT1 was < 5 compared with 40.1 to 45 mu g Hb/g feces, respectively. There were 51 screen-detected cancers in round 2 among individuals with negative FIT1 results (22 stage I, 12 stage II, 14 stage III, 3 stage IV). All 3 stage IV individuals had FIT1 results < 20 mg Hb/g feces. Conclusions: Varying rates of pathology are observed in round 2 of a screening program based on the quantitative level of a negative round 1 FIT result when the positivity threshold is relatively high. A CRC rate of 5.1% within this group appears acceptable. Although patients with incurable cancer were observed, the positivity threshold to capture these cases within round 1 would have been so sensitive that it would create an unsustainable endoscopy referral burden.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 522
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Fecal Immunochemical Test Detects Sessile Serrated Adenomas and Polyps With a Low Level of Sensitivity [J].
Chang, Li-Chun ;
Shun, Chia-Tung ;
Hsu, Weng-Feng ;
Tu, Chia-Hong ;
Tsai, Pei-Yu ;
Lin, Been-Ren ;
Liang, Jin-Tung ;
Wu, Ming-Shiang ;
Chiu, Han-Mo .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 15 (06) :872-+
[2]   Association Between Early Stage Colon Neoplasms and False-negative Results From the Fecal Immunochemical Test [J].
Chiu, Han-Mo ;
Lee, Yi-Chia ;
Tu, Chia-Hung ;
Chen, Chien-Chuan ;
Tseng, Ping-Huei ;
Liang, Jin-Tung ;
Shun, Chia-Tung ;
Lin, Jaw-Town ;
Wu, Ming-Shiang .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 11 (07) :832-+
[3]   Lower Risk of Advanced Neoplasia Among Patients With a Previous Negative Result From a Fecal Test for Colorectal Cancer [J].
Denters, Maaike J. ;
Deutekom, Marije ;
Bossuyt, Patrick M. ;
Stroobants, An K. ;
Fockens, Paul ;
Dekker, Evelien .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 142 (03) :497-504
[4]   The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM [J].
Edge, Stephen B. ;
Compton, Carolyn C. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (06) :1471-1474
[5]   Screen-detected colorectal cancers are associated with an improved outcome compared with stage-matched interval cancers [J].
Gill, M. D. ;
Bramble, M. G. ;
Hull, M. A. ;
Mills, S. J. ;
Morris, E. ;
Bradburn, D. M. ;
Bury, Y. ;
Parker, C. E. ;
Lee, T. J. W. ;
Rees, C. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 111 (11) :2076-2081
[6]  
Grobbee EJ, 2017, GASTROENTEROLOGY
[7]   Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer [J].
Hardcastle, JD ;
Chamberlain, JO ;
Robinson, MHE ;
Moss, SM ;
Amar, SS ;
Balfour, TW ;
James, PD ;
Mangham, CM .
LANCET, 1996, 348 (9040) :1472-1477
[8]   Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline [J].
Hassan, Cesare ;
Quintero, Enrique ;
Dumonceau, Jean-Marc ;
Regula, Jaroslaw ;
Brandao, Catarina ;
Chaussade, Stanislas ;
Dekker, Evelien ;
Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario ;
Ferlitsch, Monika ;
Gimeno-Garcia, Antonio ;
Hazewinkel, Yark ;
Jover, Rodrigo ;
Kalager, Mette ;
Loberg, Magnus ;
Pox, Christian ;
Rembacken, Bjorn ;
Lieberman, David .
ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 45 (10) :842-851
[9]   Fecal immunochemical test accuracy in average-risk colorectal cancer screening [J].
Hernandez, Vicent ;
Cubiella, Joaquin ;
Carmen Gonzalez-Mao, M. ;
Iglesias, Felipe ;
Rivera, Concepcion ;
Iglesias, M. Begona ;
Cid, Lucia ;
Castro, Ines ;
de Castro, Luisa ;
Vega, Pablo ;
Antonio Hermo, Jose ;
Macenlle, Ramiro ;
Martinez-Turnes, Alfonso ;
Martinez-Ares, David ;
Estevez, Pamela ;
Cid, Estela ;
Carmen Vidal, M. ;
Lopez-Martinez, Angeles ;
Hijona, Elisabeth ;
Herreros-Villanueva, Marta ;
Bujanda, Luis ;
Ignacio Rodriguez-Prada, Jose .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (04) :1038-1047
[10]   Serrated Lesions of the Colorectum: Review and Recommendations From an Expert Panel [J].
Rex, Douglas K. ;
Ahnen, Dennis J. ;
Baron, John A. ;
Batts, Kenneth P. ;
Burke, Carol A. ;
Burt, Randall W. ;
Goldblum, John R. ;
Guillem, Jose G. ;
Kahi, Charles J. ;
Kalady, Matthew F. ;
O'Brien, Michael J. ;
Odze, Robert D. ;
Ogino, Shuji ;
Parry, Susan ;
Snover, Dale C. ;
Torlakovic, Emina Emilia ;
Wise, Paul E. ;
Young, Joanne ;
Church, James .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 107 (09) :1315-1330