Beach macro-litter monitoring on southern Baltic beaches: results, experiences and recommendations

被引:60
作者
Schernewski, Gerald [1 ,2 ]
Balciunas, Arunas [1 ,2 ]
Graewe, Dennis [3 ]
Graewe, Ulf [1 ]
Klesse, Kristina [4 ]
Schulz, Marcus [5 ]
Wesnigk, Sylvie [1 ]
Fleet, David [6 ]
Haseler, Mirco [1 ]
Moellman, Nils [7 ]
Werner, Stefanie [8 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Balt Sea Res, Seestr 15, D-18119 Rostock, Germany
[2] Klaipeda Univ, Marine Sci & Technol Ctr, H Manto 84, LT-92294 Klaipeda, Lithuania
[3] State Agcy Environm Nat Conservat & Geol Mecklenb, Goldberger Str 12, D-18273 Gustrow, Germany
[4] EUCC Coastal Union Germany eV, Seestr 15, D-18119 Rostock, Germany
[5] AquaEcol GmbH & Co KG, Marie Curie Str 1, D-26129 Oldenburg, Germany
[6] Natl Pk Author, Natl Pk & Marine Conservat, Schleswig Holstein Agcy Coastal Def, Schlossgarten 1, D-25832 Tonning, Germany
[7] NABU, Charitestr 3, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[8] German Environm Agcy UBA, Worlitzer Pl 1, D-06844 Dessau Rosslau, Germany
关键词
Marine strategy framework directive; Marine policy; Cormorant; Model simulation; Cluster analysis; NORTH-SEA; MARINE DEBRIS; STATISTICAL-ANALYSES; BRISTOL CHANNEL; PLASTIC DEBRIS; TIME-SERIES; POLLUTION; ORIGIN;
D O I
10.1007/s11852-016-0489-x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Major objectives were to provide a comprehensive dataset on beach macro-litter for parts of the southern Baltic Sea and to analyse if the methodology is fully applicable and a suitable monitoring method in the Baltic. We carried out a regular macro litter beach monitoring (OSPAR methodology, 4 time a year) on 35 beaches along the German and Lithuanian Baltic coast over 2-5 years. Additional experiments addressed the subjectivity of the field surveys and spatio-temporal variability on different scales. We observed no seasonality of the data and a monthly compared to a 3-monthly sampling resulted in 3 times higher annual item numbers. Along the Lithuanian coast, the average number of items per survey varied between 138 and 340 and along the German Baltic coast between 7 and 404, with a median value of 47. All data showed a very high spatio-temporal variability. Using the Matrix Scoring Technique we assessed beach litter sources. With 50% tourism and recreation was the most important source. 3D-transport simulations helped to explain the minor role of shipping as a source and, compared to the North Sea, the low numbers of items on German Baltic beaches. Floating litter had a short duration time in the western Baltic Sea and offshore drift dominated. Further, the common regular beach cleanings reduced the potential for local litter accumulation and translocation. We suggest a monitoring system on 14 Baltic beaches in Germany and 2 in Lithuania and provide cost calculations. The analysis of macro-litter in cormorant nesting material and the search for beached dead animals did not show any result. We can conclude that the macro-litter beach monitoring method is less suitable for Baltic beaches and should only serve as a complementary method in combination with others.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 25
页数:21
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]  
HELCOM, 2008, MARINE LITTER WITHIN
[12]   Quantitative analysis of plastic debris on recreational beaches in Mumbai, India [J].
Jayasiri, H. B. ;
Purushothaman, C. S. ;
Vennila, A. .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2013, 77 (1-2) :107-112
[13]  
JRC, 2013, GUIDANCE ON MONITORI
[14]  
JRC, 2010, TASK GROUP 10 REPORT
[15]   Quantification of spurious dissipation and mixing - Discrete variance decay in a Finite-Volume framework [J].
Klingbeil, Knut ;
Mohammadi-Aragh, Mahdi ;
Graewe, Ulf ;
Burchard, Hans .
OCEAN MODELLING, 2014, 81 :49-64
[16]  
Lippiatt S., 2013, MARINE DEBRIS MONITO
[17]  
MARLIN, 2013, FINAL REPORT OF BALT
[18]   INCIDENCE AND TYPES OF PLASTIC IN GANNETS NESTS IN THE NORTHWEST ATLANTIC [J].
MONTEVECCHI, WA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1991, 69 (02) :295-297
[19]   Marine litter ensemble transport simulations in the southern North Sea [J].
Neumann, Daniel ;
Callies, Ulrich ;
Matthies, Michael .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2014, 86 (1-2) :219-228
[20]  
OSPAR, 2010, GUIDELINE FOR MONITO