The Pharyngeal Airways of Patients with Class II Malocclusion: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Analysis

被引:0
作者
Unuvar, Yazgi Ay [1 ]
Zortuk, Fundagul Bilgic [2 ]
Ozer, Torun [3 ]
Beycan, Kadir [4 ]
机构
[1] Adnan Menderes Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, TR-09010 Aydin, Turkey
[2] Hatay Mustafa Kemal Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, TR-31070 Antakya, Turkey
[3] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, TR-35340 Izmir, Turkey
[4] Marmara Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, TR-34722 Istanbul, Turkey
来源
MAKARA JOURNAL OF HEALTH RESEARCH | 2021年 / 25卷 / 02期
关键词
cone-beam computed tomography; mandibular retrusion; obstructive sleep apnea; SLEEP-APNEA; SKELETAL; DIMENSIONS; PATTERNS; VOLUME; SPACE; GROWTH; SHAPE; SIZE;
D O I
10.7454/msk.v25i2.1272
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to compare the minimum axial (min Ax) area and the volumes of the nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) airways of patients with Class II malocclusion with different sagittal positions of the mandible and maxilla and patients with Class I malocclusion with normal jaw positions. Methods: Airway areas and volumes of 51 patients with Class I malocclusion with normal maxillary and mandibular positions (0 < ANB < 4, 84 > SNA > 80, and 82 > SNB > 78) were compared with 21 patients with Class II malocclusion with normal maxillary and retrognathic mandibular positions (ANB>4, 84>SNA>80, and SNB<78) and 21 patients with Class II malocclusion with prognathic maxillary and normal mandibular positions (ANB>4, SNA>84, and 82>SNB>78). Results: In the comparison of airway measurements between Class I and Class II groups, significant differences were found in the OP airway volume, total airway volume, and minimum OP axial area. Patients with Class II mandibular retrusion had smaller OP airway volume. The total airway volume and min Ax area were significantly lower in the Class II mandibular retrusion group than in other groups. Conclusions: The sagittal position of the jaws affects the OP airway volume and the minimum axial airway area, but not the NP airway volume.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 121
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Comparison of airway space with conventional lateral headfilms and 3-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam computed tomography
    Aboudara, Cameron
    Nielsen, Ib
    Huang, John C.
    Maki, Koutaro
    Miller, Arthur J.
    Hatcher, David
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 135 (04) : 468 - 479
  • [2] CHARACTERISTICS OF MALOCCLUSION - A MODERN APPROACH TO CLASSIFICATION AND DIAGNOSIS
    ACKERMAN, JL
    PROFFIT, WR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1969, 56 (05): : 443 - &
  • [3] Evaluation of pharyngeal airway space amongst different skeletal patterns
    Alves, M., Jr.
    Franzotti, E. S.
    Baratieri, C.
    Nunes, L. K. F.
    Nojima, L. I.
    Ruellas, A. C. O.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 41 (07) : 814 - 819
  • [4] Sleep apnea: Clinical investigations in humans
    Banno, Katsuhisa
    Kryger, Meir H.
    [J]. SLEEP MEDICINE, 2007, 8 (04) : 400 - 426
  • [5] A STUDY ON THE PHARYNGEAL SIZE IN DIFFERENT SKELETAL PATTERNS
    CEYLAN, I
    OKTAY, H
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1995, 108 (01) : 69 - 75
  • [6] Chen YS., BIOMED RES INT, V2021
  • [7] Upper and lower pharyngeal airways in subjects with Class I and Class II malocclusions and different growth patterns
    de Freitas, Marcos Roberto
    Penteado Virmond Alcazar, Nadyr Maria
    Janson, Guilherme
    Salvatore de Freitas, Karina Maria
    Castanha Henriques, Jose Fernando
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2006, 130 (06) : 742 - 745
  • [8] El H, 2013, EUR J ORTHODONT, V35, P262, DOI 10.1093/ejo/cjr114
  • [9] El H, 2010, AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC, V137, DOI [10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.11.010, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.01.014]
  • [10] Airway volume for different dentofacial skeletal patterns
    El, Hakan
    Palomo, Juan Martin
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 139 (06) : E511 - E521