Air traffic flow management under emission policies: Analyzing the impact of sustainable aviation fuel and different carbon prices

被引:15
作者
Hamdan, Sadeque [1 ,2 ]
Jouini, Oualid [2 ]
Cheaitou, Ali [3 ]
Jemai, Zied [2 ,4 ]
Granberg, Tobias Andersson [5 ]
Josefsson, Billy [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kent, Kent Business Sch, Canterbury, England
[2] Univ Paris Saclay, CentraleSupelec, Lab Genie Ind, 3 Rue Joliot Curie, F-91190 Gif Sur Yvette, France
[3] Univ Sharjah, Ind Engn & Engn Management Dept, Sharjah 27272, U Arab Emirates
[4] Univ Tunis Elmanar, OASIS ENIT, Tunis, Tunisia
[5] Linkoping Univ, Div Commun & Transport Syst, ITN, S-60174 Norrkoping, Sweden
[6] LFV, Norrkoping, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Green aviation; Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF); Carbon price; Emission policy; Air traffic flow management (ATFM); CLIMATE-CHANGE; SOCIAL COST; CONSUMPTION; BIOFUELS; TAX;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2022.09.013
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As part of the global efforts to make aviation activities more environmentally friendly, the worldwide goal is to achieve a 50% reduction in the 2005 emissions by 2050. In this context, aviation emissions represent a critical challenge to aviation activities, especially with the increasing travel demand up to the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis, starting in 2020. One of the potential drivers that would help the aviation industry reduce its emissions is the use of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). In this study, we analyzed the impact of SAF from an air traffic flow management (ATFM) perspective, considering delay and re-routing costs. We developed an optimization model that considers, in addition to the traditional ATFM costs, fuel costs and carbon dioxide emissions. We investigated the impact of accounting for these two new aspects, that is, fuel costs and emissions, on ATFM performance, and we compared SAF with conventional fuel. The analysis of a real case study revealed that, in addition to delay and re-routing costs, fuel cost should be included in the ATFM model so that the resulting solution becomes economically and environmentally realistic for airlines. The increase in the fuel cost and network delays when using SAF requires setting an appropriate carbon price under an emission policy, such as the carbon offsetting and reduction scheme for international flights policy, to make SAF more attractive. Furthermore, flexible re-routing programs for flights operated using SAF make it advantageous from an ATFM perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 40
页数:27
相关论文
共 94 条
  • [51] ICAO Secretariat, 2019, INTRO ICAO BASKET ME
  • [52] International Air Transport Association, 2019, SWISS PROP AV CARB T
  • [53] International Air Transport Association, 2018, IATA ANN REV 2018
  • [54] International Civil Aviation Organization, 2019, QUESTIONS COST IMPAC
  • [55] International Civil Aviation Organization, 2019, CORSIA ELIGIBLE FUEL
  • [56] International Civil Aviation Organization, 2019, CARBON OFFSETTING RE
  • [57] Air Traffic Flow Management slot allocation to minimize propagated delay and improve airport slot adherence
    Ivanov, Nikola
    Netjasov, Fedja
    Jovanovic, Radosav
    Starita, Stefano
    Strauss, Arne
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2017, 95 : 183 - 197
  • [58] Jardine C.N., 2005, CALCULATING ENV IMPA
  • [59] Carbon tax or sustainable aviation fuel quota
    Jiang, Changmin
    Yang, Hangjun
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 103
  • [60] Synthetic control methods for policy analysis: Evaluating the effect of the European Emission Trading System on aviation supply
    Kang, Yicheng
    Liao, Sha
    Jiang, Changmin
    D'Alfonso, Tiziana
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 162 : 236 - 252