All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy

被引:139
作者
Clayton, Amanda [1 ]
O'Brien, Diana Z. [2 ]
Piscopo, Jennifer M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Polit Sci, 230 Appleton Pl, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Polit Sci, 2010 Allen Bldg,4348 TAMU, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Occident Coll, Dept Polit, 1600 Campus Rd, Los Angeles, CA 90041 USA
关键词
DESCRIPTIVE REPRESENTATION; GENDER QUOTAS; WOMEN; STEREOTYPES; CANDIDATE; CITIZENS; GENERATE; RACE;
D O I
10.1111/ajps.12391
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
What does women's presence in political decision-making bodies signal to citizens? Do these signals differ based on the body's policy decisions? And do women and men respond to women's presence similarly? Though scholars have demonstrated the substantive and symbolic benefits of women's representation, little work has examined how women's presence affects citizens' perceptions of democratic legitimacy. We test the relationship between representation and legitimacy beliefs through survey experiments on a nationally representative sample of U.S. citizens. First, we find that women's equal presence legitimizes decisions that go against women's interests. We show suggestive evidence that this effect is particularly pronounced among men, who tend to hold less certain views on women's rights. Second, across decision outcomes and issue areas, women's equal presence legitimizes decision-making processes and confers institutional trust and acquiescence. These findings add new theoretical insights into how, when, and for whom inclusive representation increases perceptions of democratic legitimacy.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 129
页数:17
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Change in Women's Descriptive Representation and the Belief in Women's Ability to Govern: A Virtuous Cycle [J].
Alexander, Amy C. .
POLITICS & GENDER, 2012, 8 (04) :437-464
[2]   The Legitimacy of Representation: How Descriptive, Formal, and Responsiveness Representation Affect the Acceptability of Political Decisions [J].
Arnesen, Sveinung ;
Peters, Yvette .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2018, 51 (07) :868-899
[3]   Minority representation, empowerment, and participation [J].
Banducci, SA ;
Donovan, T ;
Karp, JA .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2004, 66 (02) :534-556
[4]   The Effects of Counterstereotypic Gender Strategies on Candidate Evaluations [J].
Bauer, Nichole M. .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 38 (02) :279-295
[5]   Who stereotypes female candidates? Identifying individual differences in feminine stereotype reliance [J].
Bauer, Nichole M. .
POLITICS GROUPS AND IDENTITIES, 2015, 3 (01) :94-110
[6]   POWERFUL WOMEN: DOES EXPOSURE REDUCE BIAS? [J].
Beaman, Lori ;
Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra ;
Duflo, Esther ;
Pande, Rohini ;
Topalova, Petia .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2009, 124 (04) :1497-1540
[7]   Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk [J].
Berinsky, Adam J. ;
Huber, Gregory A. ;
Lenz, Gabriel S. .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 20 (03) :351-368
[8]   Gender Quotas and the Crisis of the Mediocre Man: Theory and Evidence from Sweden [J].
Besley, Timothy ;
Folke, Olle ;
Persson, Torsten ;
Rickne, Johanna .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 107 (08) :2204-2242
[9]   Hanna Pitkin's "Concept of Representation" Revisited Introduction [J].
Celis, Karen ;
Mazur, Amy G. .
POLITICS & GENDER, 2012, 8 (04) :508-512
[10]   The Substantive Representation of Women: What to Do with Conservative Claims? [J].
Celis, Karen ;
Childs, Sarah .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 2012, 60 (01) :213-225