Position of interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Effect on 3-dimensional stability and sagittal lumbar contour

被引:36
作者
Faundez, Antonio A. [1 ]
Mehbod, Amir A. [2 ]
Wu, Chunhui [3 ]
Wu, Wentien [4 ]
Ploumis, Avraam [5 ]
Transfeldt, Ensor E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hop Univ Geneve, Serv Chirurg Orthoped & Traumatol Appareil Moteur, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Twin Cities Spine Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Fdn Advancement Spinal Knowledge, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Buddhist Tzu Chi Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Hualien, Taiwan
[5] Gen Army Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Thessaloniki, Greece
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES | 2008年 / 21卷 / 03期
关键词
interbody fusion; mechanical stability; segmental lordosis;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e318074bb7d
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Biomechanical study. Objective: To test 2 different intervertebral positions of a semilunar cage and their effects on 3-dimensional stability and segmental lordosis in a model of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Summary of Background Data: In his original TLTF description, Harms recommended decortication of endplates, followed by placement of mesh cages in the middle-posterior intervertebral third. Subsequent studies presented conflicting recommendations: anterior placement of the spacer-cage for better load-sharing versus placement on the stronger posterolateral endplate regions. Methods: Six human lumbar spinal functional units were first tested intact. TLIF was performed using a semilunar poly-ether-ether-ketone cage randomly inserted in the anterior (TLIF-A) or posterior (TLIF-P) disc space. Pedicle screws and rods were added. Unconstrained pure moments in axial-torsion, lateral-bending (LB), and flexion-extension (FE) were applied under 0.05 Hz and +/- 5 Nm sinusoidal waveform. Segmental motions were recorded. Range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) were calculated. Pairwise comparisons were made using nonparametric Wilcoxon-matched pairs signed rank sum test with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. Results: TLIF-A and TLIF-P significantly decreased ROM (P < 0.05) of the intact spinal functional unit, in FE and LB. In axial-torsion, decrease of ROM after TLIF procedures was not significant (P > 0.05). Delta-ROM between TLIF-A and TLIF-P was not significant (P > 0.05). TLIF-A and TLIF-P significantly decreased NZ in LB (P < 0.05). In FE, TLIF-P significantly decreased NZ (P < 0.05); TLIF-A showed a trend toward significance (P = 0.09). Delta-NZ between TLIF-A and TLIF-P was not significant (P > 0.05). Segmental lordosis of TLIF-A and TLIF-P on C-arm views showed angle differences within the range of measurement error of Cobb angles. Conclusions: Difference in ROM and NZ between anterior (TLIF-A) or posterior (TLIF-P) positions was not statistically significant. Similarly, both positions did not influence segmental lordosis.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 180
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion performed at 1 and 2 levels [J].
Ames, CP ;
Acosta, FL ;
Chi, J ;
Iyengar, J ;
Muiru, W ;
Acaroglu, E ;
Puttlitz, CM .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (19) :E562-E566
[2]   VASCULAR INJURY IN ANTERIOR LUMBAR SURGERY [J].
BAKER, JK ;
REARDON, PR ;
REARDON, MJ ;
HEGGENESS, MH .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (15) :2227-2230
[3]   Overview of the biology of lumbar spine fusion and principles for selecting a bone graft substitute [J].
Boden, SD .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (16) :S26-S31
[4]  
Brau Salvador A, 2004, Spine J, V4, P409, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.12.003
[5]   INCREASING NEUROFORAMINAL VOLUME BY ANTERIOR INTERBODY DISTRACTION IN DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINE [J].
CHEN, DY ;
FAY, LA ;
LOK, J ;
YUAN, P ;
EDWARDS, WT ;
YUAN, HA .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (01) :74-79
[6]  
Cheng CK, 2002, BIO-MED MATER ENG, V12, P367
[7]   Retrograde ejaculation after retroperitoneal lower lumbar interbody fusion [J].
Christensen, FB ;
Bunger, CE .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 1997, 21 (03) :176-180
[8]   Instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bioresorbable polymer implants and iliac crest autograft [J].
Coe, JD ;
Vaccaro, AR .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (17) :S76-S83
[9]  
EVANS JH, 1985, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P38
[10]   Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion [J].
Gödde, S ;
Fritsch, E ;
Dienst, M ;
Kohn, D .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (15) :1693-1699