Competition and Facilitation Effects of Semi-Natural Habitats Drive Total Insect and Pollinator Abundance in Flower Strips

被引:15
|
作者
Schoch, Kevin [1 ]
Tschumi, Matthias [2 ]
Lutter, Stefan [1 ]
Ramseier, Hans [1 ]
Zingg, Silvia [1 ]
机构
[1] Bern Univ Appl Sci, Sch Agr Forest & Food Sci, Zollikofen, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Ornithol Inst, Sempach, Switzerland
来源
关键词
agri-environment scheme (AES); biodiversity promotion area; agroecology; ecosystem service; natural enemies; functional biodiversity; habitat quality; landscape composition; AGRI-ENVIRONMENT SCHEMES; SOWN WILDFLOWER STRIPS; SPECIES RESPONSES; WILD BEES; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; DIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; INCREASE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2022.854058
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Flower strips are an effective agri-environmental measure to promote functional biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. In particular, tailored annual flower strips are increasingly implemented to foster insect pollination and biological pest control. While positive effects of flower strips on service providers and associated ecosystem services were recently demonstrated, little is known about how their effectiveness is affected by the surrounding landscape. We investigated how landscape composition and configuration, as well as flower strip traits influence the abundance of all insects, pollinators and natural enemies in 74 annual flower strips across 7 years (2014-2020). Landscape characteristics such as crop diversity, mean field size, area, and quality of semi-natural farmland habitats were assessed in a 1-km radius surrounding flower strips and combined with flower strip traits such as size, flower coverage, and flowering plant species richness to model insect abundance and diversity. Total insect and pollinator abundance, as well as wild bee abundance, richness, and diversity in flower strips were negatively affected by the share of semi-natural farmland habitats in the surrounding landscape, suggesting a dilution effect. On the other hand, semi-natural habitats with elevated ecological quality (i.e., biodiversity promotion areas with high botanical and structural diversity) enhanced total insect and pollinator abundance in flower strips. Furthermore, pollinator abundance and wild bee abundance in specific were positively affected by the flower coverage of the strips. Our results therefore suggest simultaneous competition and facilitation effects of semi-natural habitats on the landscape scale depending on their ecological quality. Annual flower strips will therefore be most effective in fostering services in landscapes of moderate to low complexity but with a high share of semi-natural habitats with increased ecological quality. For additional benefits for pollinator and wild bee abundance, flower strips should be designed to yield high flower cover. Our study thus highlights the importance of quality of ecological infrastructure and provides recommendations to maximize ecosystem services and biodiversity by means of flower strips at the landscape scale.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [21] Long-term effects of fertilisation regime on earthworm abundance in a semi-natural grassland area
    Timmerman, Arend
    Bos, Daan
    Ouwehand, Janne
    de Goede, Ron G. M.
    PEDOBIOLOGIA, 2006, 50 (05) : 427 - 432
  • [22] Both semi-natural and ruderal habitats matter for supporting insect functional diversity in an abandoned quarry in the city of Krakow (S Poland)
    Kalarus, Konrad
    Halecki, Wiktor
    Skalski, Tomasz
    URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2019, 22 (05) : 943 - 953
  • [23] Woody semi-natural habitats modulate the effects of field size and functional crop diversity on farmland birds
    Frank, Claudia
    Hertzog, Lionel
    Klimek, Sebastian
    Schwieder, Marcel
    Tetteh, Gideon Okpoti
    Boehner, Hannah G. S.
    Roeder, Norbert
    Levers, Christian
    Katzenberger, Jakob
    Kreft, Holger
    Kamp, Johannes
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2024, 61 (05) : 987 - 999
  • [24] Disentangling the relative effects of semi-natural habitats within different landscape agricultural intensities on bird communities
    Wenyu Xu
    Yongshan Xu
    Zheng Han
    Jiyuan Yao
    Piotr Tryjanowski
    Haitao Wang
    Avian Research, 2025, 16 (01) : 63 - 73
  • [25] Frequent insecticide applications in cotton fields offset the positive impact of surrounding semi-natural habitats on in-field ladybeetle abundance
    Pan, Yunfei
    Yang, Long
    Liu, Haining
    Wang, Kaitao
    Wang, Hainuo
    Li, Haiqiang
    Lu, Yanhui
    ENTOMOLOGIA GENERALIS, 2023, 43 (06) : 1077 - 1087
  • [26] Semi-natural habitat cover but not late season mass-flowering crops affect pollinator-plant networks in non-crop habitats
    Teixeira, T. S. M.
    Berggren, A.
    Riggi, L. G. A.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 381
  • [27] Both semi-natural and ruderal habitats matter for supporting insect functional diversity in an abandoned quarry in the city of Kraków (S Poland)
    Konrad Kalarus
    Wiktor Halecki
    Tomasz Skalski
    Urban Ecosystems, 2019, 22 : 943 - 953
  • [28] Effects of horse grazing on plant species richness and abundance of Iris setosa in a boreal semi-natural grassland, Japan
    Shoji, Atsushi
    Hayashi, Haruo
    Kohyama, Kazunori
    Sasaki, Hiroyuki
    GRASSLAND SCIENCE, 2011, 57 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [29] Butterflies in semi-natural pastures and power-line corridors - effects of flower richness, management, and structural vegetation characteristics
    Berg, Ake
    Ahrne, Karin
    Ockinger, Erik
    Svensson, Roger
    Wissman, Jorgen
    INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY, 2013, 6 (06) : 639 - 657
  • [30] The effects of Chilomonas on the life history traits of Daphnia longispina under semi-natural conditions and the implications for competition in the plankton
    Lair, N
    Picard, V
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2000, 429 (1-3) : 79 - 87