Effects of a Punitive Environment on Children's Executive Functioning: A Natural Experiment

被引:32
作者
Talwar, Victoria [1 ]
Carlson, Stephanie M. [2 ]
Lee, Kang [3 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Educ & Counselling Psychol, Montreal, PQ H3A 1Y2, Canada
[2] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
关键词
corporal punishment; executive functioning; discipline style; self-regulation; CORPORAL PUNISHMENT; SELF-REGULATION; EFFORTFUL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; BEHAVIORAL-INHIBITION; ANTISOCIAL-BEHAVIOR; DECISION-MAKING; PARENTING GOALS; EARLY-CHILDHOOD; YOUNG-CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00617.x
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Few studies have examined the influence of environmental factors on children's executive functioning (EF) performance. The present study examined the effects of a punitive vs. non-punitive school environment on West African children's EF skills. Tasks included a 'cool' (relatively non-affective) and 'hot' (relatively affective/motivational) version of three EF tasks: delay of gratification; gift delay; and dimensional change card sort. Children had more difficulties with the hot versions of the tasks than the cool versions, and older children outperformed younger children. After controlling for verbal ability (Peabody picture vocabulary test-third edition), a consistent pattern of interaction between school and grade level emerged. Overall, kindergarten children in the punitive school performed no differently than their counterparts in the non-punitive school. However, in grade 1, children in the punitive school performed significantly worse than their counterparts in the non-punitive school. These results point to the need to consider interactions among discipline style, age, and internalization processes of self-regulation to better understand environmental influences on EF development.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 824
页数:20
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, ANTISOCIAL BOYS SOCI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development
[3]   TRANSMISSION OF AGGRESSION THROUGH IMITATION O AGGRESSIVE MODELS [J].
BANDURA, A ;
ROSS, SA ;
ROSS, D .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1961, 63 (03) :575-&
[4]   Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD [J].
Barkley, RA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1997, 121 (01) :65-94
[5]   Necessary distinctions [J].
Baumrind, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 1997, 8 (03) :176-182
[6]  
Baumrind D, 1996, PEDIATRICS, V98, P828
[7]  
Baumrind D., 1991, J EARLY ADOLESC, V11, P56
[8]  
Bechara A, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19, P5473
[9]   PREDICTION OF IQ AND LANGUAGE SKILL FROM PERINATAL STATUS, CHILD PERFORMANCE, FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS, AND MOTHER-INFANT INTERACTION [J].
BEE, HL ;
BARNARD, KE ;
EYRES, SJ ;
GRAY, CA ;
HAMMOND, MA ;
SPIETZ, AL ;
SNYDER, C ;
CLARK, B .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1982, 53 (05) :1134-1156
[10]   Exploring reciprocal parent and child effects in the case of child inhibition in US and Korean samples [J].
Belsky, J ;
Rha, JH ;
Park, SY .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 24 (03) :338-347