Comparing cytochrome P450 pharmacogenetic information available on United States drug labels and European Union Summaries of Product Characteristics

被引:8
作者
Reis-Pardal, J. [1 ]
Rodrigues, A. [2 ]
Rodrigues, E. [3 ]
Fernandez-Llimos, F. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Fac Pharm, Res Inst Med IMed ULisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Fac Pharm, Postgrad Program Regulatory Affairs, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Res Univ Lisbon, Fac Pharm, Dept Biochem & Human Biol, Inst Med IMed ULisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Univ Lisbon, Fac Pharm, Dept Social Pharm, Res Inst Med IMed ULisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY INFORMATION; PRESCRIBING INFORMATION; BIOMARKER INFORMATION; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; RENAL IMPAIRMENT; PACKAGE INSERTS; RECOMMENDATIONS; QUALITY; SPC; US;
D O I
10.1038/tpj.2016.40
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Regulatory agencies are increasing the pharmacogenomic information in their official drug labeling. However, despite the importance of regulatory harmonization, this implementation may not be running in parallel among major agencies. Comparing labeling of medicines approved by different agencies may identify gaps to solve. Our study compared the cytochrome P450 pharmacogenetic information included in the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labels and European Union (EU) Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPCs). US labels presented significantly more specific pharmacogenetic subheadings (51 vs 26%), more prevalence and pharmacokinetic data for each metabolic phenotype (59 vs 25% and 82 vs 48%, respectively) and more applicable information about dose modifications required (25 vs 5%). Approximately 75% of the US labels evaluated scored higher on the overall quality than the analogous EU SmPCs, and this difference was not associated with the time since the EU SmPCs' last review. To enhance harmonization, regulatory agencies should simultaneously introduce the pharmacogenetic information in their drug labeling.
引用
收藏
页码:488 / 493
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Abramson Joseph H, 2011, Epidemiol Perspect Innov, V8, P1, DOI 10.1186/1742-5573-8-1
  • [2] Clinical pharmacology information in summaries of product characteristics and package inserts
    Arguello, B.
    Fernandez-Llimos, F.
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 82 (05) : 566 - 571
  • [3] Assessing the information in the Summaries of Product Characteristics for the use of medicines in pregnancy and lactation
    Arguello, Blanca
    Salgado, Teresa M.
    Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 79 (03) : 537 - 544
  • [4] Arnet I, 2010, SWISS MED WKLY, V140, P105, DOI smw-12953
  • [5] Information for Adequate Prescribing to Older Patients An Evaluation of the Product Information of 53 Recently Approved Medicines
    Beers, Erna
    Egberts, Toine C. G.
    Leufkens, Hubert G. M.
    Jansen, Paul A. F.
    [J]. DRUGS & AGING, 2013, 30 (04) : 255 - 262
  • [6] Information deficits in the summary of product characteristics preclude an optimal management of drug interactions: a comparison with evidence from the literature
    Bergk, V
    Haefeli, WE
    Gasse, C
    Brenner, H
    Martin-Facklam, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 61 (5-6) : 327 - 335
  • [7] GEOGRAPHICAL INTERRACIAL DIFFERENCES IN POLYMORPHIC DRUG OXIDATION - CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE OF CYTOCHROMES P450 (CYP) 2D6 AND 2C19
    BERTILSSON, L
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1995, 29 (03) : 192 - 209
  • [8] Conrado DJ, 2013, PHARMACOGENOMICS, V14, P215, DOI [10.2217/PGS.12.203, 10.2217/pgs.12.203]
  • [9] The AmpliChip™ CYP450 Genotyping Test -: Integrating a new clinical tool
    de Leon, Jose
    Susce, Margaret T.
    Murray-Carmichael, Elaina
    [J]. MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS & THERAPY, 2006, 10 (03) : 135 - 151
  • [10] Pharmacogenomic information in drug labels: European Medicines Agency perspective
    Ehmann, F.
    Caneva, L.
    Prasad, K.
    Paulmichl, M.
    Maliepaard, M.
    Llerena, A.
    Ingelman-Sundberg, M.
    Papaluca-Amati, M.
    [J]. PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (03) : 201 - 210