Possibility schema for interdisciplinary forest management evaluation and decision-making

被引：2
|
作者：
Kijazi, MH [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Toronto, Fac Forestry, Toronto, ON M5S 3B3, Canada
来源：
FORESTRY CHRONICLE | 2005年 / 81卷 / 03期
关键词：
decision-making; fuzzy sets; inexactness; interdisciplinary evaluation; multiple values; possibility theory; sustainable forest management; uncertainty;
D O I：
10.5558/tfc81375-3
中图分类号：
S7 [林业];
学科分类号：
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要：
Interdisciplinary planning and evaluation of forest management is necessary for sustainable forest management (SFM) schemes involving multiple values of multi-stakeholders. Often, multi-objective forest-planning and evaluation encounter complexity and uncertainty due to "inexactness" - i.e., fuzziness, ambiguity, imprecision and variability - of spatial behaviours of ecological and human systems. This paper develops the possibility schema - from fuzzy sets and theory of possibility - for representation and evaluation of inexact spatial concepts, configurations, and processes, associated with forest ecosystem and stakeholder values. A hypothetical case of interdisciplinary research utilizing criteria and indicators of SFM is used to illustrate the utility of the proposed possibility schema in interdisciplinary forest decision-making. The schema can be used for ex-antc appraisal and ex-post evaluation of forest programs. It can also be used for intearation of interdisciplinary forest knowledge, including ecological and socio-economic models of SFM.
引用
收藏
页码：375 / 380
页数：6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Models for library management, decision-making, and planning
    Line, MB
    ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2002, 20 (06) : 519 - 519
  • [32] Support of Decision-Making in Organizations' Quality Management
    Leonova, T. I.
    Mager, V. E.
    Mikeladze, B. D.
    Chernenkaya, L. V.
    Chernenkii, A. V.
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2017 XX IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING AND MEASUREMENTS (SCM), 2017, : 843 - 845
  • [33] Navigating Sustainability Embeddedness in Management Decision-Making
    Le Roux, Catherine
    Pretorius, Marius
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (05)
  • [34] Collaborative Decision-Making in Emergency and Disaster Management
    Kapucu, Naim
    Garayev, Vener
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2011, 34 (06) : 366 - 375
  • [35] MANAGEMENT MISTAKES IN CONTEMPORARY CORPORATE DECISION-MAKING
    Dubrovski, Drago
    INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTIONS, FROM THE GLOBALIZATION AND POST-GLOBALIZATION PERSPECTIVE, VOL II: CHANGE MANAGEMENT: NEW COORDINATES, 2009, : 74 - 84
  • [36] THE CONTROLLING MODEL AS MANAGEMENT SUPPORT IN DECISION-MAKING
    Bolfek, Berislav
    EKONOMSKI VJESNIK, 2010, 23 (01): : 94 - 113
  • [37] Contingency management and deliberative decision-making processes
    Regier, Paul S.
    Redish, David
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 6
  • [38] DEBIASING STRATEGIES IN SUPPLY MANAGEMENT DECISION-MAKING
    Kaufmann, Lutz
    Michel, Alex
    Carter, Craig R.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS, 2009, 30 (01) : 85 - +
  • [39] COOPERATIVE WORK AND DECISION-MAKING IN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
    SAMURCAY, R
    ROGALSKI, J
    TRAVAIL HUMAIN, 1993, 56 (01): : 53 - 77
  • [40] A comparison between I-Ching's early management decision-making model and western management decision-making models
    Hsu, Mu-Lan
    Chiu, Kuan-Yao
    CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2008, 2 (01) : 52 - 75
12345