Neutralization activity and persistence of antibodies induced in response to vaccination with a novel mumps strain, RIT 4385

被引:15
作者
Usonis, V
Bakasenas, V
Denis, M
机构
[1] Vilnius State Univ, Ctr Pediat, LT-2009 Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Ctr Infect Dis Control & Prophylaxis, Vilnius, Lithuania
[3] SmithKline Beecham Biol, Rixensart, Belgium
关键词
measles; mumps; rubella (MMR) vaccine; Priorix (TM); M-M-R (TM) II; neutralization; antibodies;
D O I
10.1007/s15010-001-1098-7
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: We have previously shown that a new measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine, Priorix (TM), with a novel mumps component elicits anti-mumps antibody titers comparable to the licensed M-M-R (TM) II vaccine. Materials and Methods: To ensure that these antibodies had neutralizing activity against wild-type mumps virus, sera were prepared 2 and 18 months after vaccination of 12-24month-old infants with either Priorix (TM) or M-M-R (TM) II and ELISA antibody titers and neutralizing activity were determined. Results: After 2 months, Priorix (TM) and M-M-R (TM) II vaccines elicited comparable ELISA antibody titers and neutralizing activity, At 18 months ELISA seropositivity rates were 80-81% and 94-96% of vaccinees had neutralizing activity. ALL ELISA seropositives had neutralizing activity. Conclusion: These data suggest that both vaccines provided equivalent protection against mumps over this 18-month period.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 162
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] THE LYNN,JERYL VACCINE STRAIN OF MUMPS-VIRUS IS A MIXTURE OF 2 DISTINCT ISOLATES
    AFZAL, MA
    PICKFORD, AR
    FORSEY, T
    HEATH, AB
    MINOR, PD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY, 1993, 74 : 917 - 920
  • [2] Field evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of vaccines against pertussis, measles, rubella and mumps
    D'Argenio, P
    Citarella, A
    Selvaggi, MTM
    [J]. VACCINE, 1998, 16 (08) : 818 - 822
  • [3] Dias J.A., 1996, Euro Surveill, V1, P25
  • [4] A NEW METHOD FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS FROM DIPHTHERIA-TETANUS-PERTUSSIS AND MEASLES MUMPS RUBELLA VACCINES
    FARRINGTON, P
    PUGH, S
    COLVILLE, A
    FLOWER, A
    NASH, J
    MORGANCAPNER, P
    RUSH, M
    MILLER, E
    [J]. LANCET, 1995, 345 (8949): : 567 - 569
  • [5] COMPARISON OF A NEUTRALIZATION ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY AND AN ENZYME-LINKED-IMMUNOSORBENT-ASSAY FOR EVALUATION OF IMMUNE STATUS OF CHILDREN VACCINATED FOR MUMPS
    HARMSEN, T
    JONGERIUS, MC
    VANDERZWAN, CW
    PLANTINGA, AD
    KRAAIJEVELD, CA
    BERBERS, GAM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (08) : 2139 - 2144
  • [6] MILLER E, 1993, LANCET, V13, P799
  • [7] Laboratory tests of mumps vaccines
    Minor, PD
    [J]. BIOLOGICALS, 1997, 25 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [8] Re: . Usonis et al.: Comparatie Study of Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity of New and Established Measles, Mumps and Rubella accines in Healthy Children (Infection 26 [1998] 222-226)
    Nalin D.
    [J]. Infection, 1999, 27 (2) : 134 - 134
  • [9] SENSITIVE NEUTRALIZATION TEST FOR VIRUS-ANTIBODY .1. MUMPS ANTIBODY
    SATO, H
    ALBRECHT, P
    HICKS, JT
    MEYER, BC
    ENNIS, FA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 1978, 58 (04) : 301 - 311
  • [10] Safety and characterization of the immune response engendered by two combined measles, mumps and rubella vaccines
    Schwarzer, S
    Reibel, S
    Lang, AB
    Struck, MM
    Finkel, B
    Gerike, E
    Tischer, A
    Gassner, M
    Glück, R
    Stück, B
    Cryz, SJ
    [J]. VACCINE, 1998, 16 (2-3) : 298 - 304